| Literature DB >> 31350991 |
J Wang1, B Wang1, H Du1, H Zhang1, H Li1, F Wang1, X Zhao1,2.
Abstract
Probiotics are considered the preferred alternatives to antibiotics for growth promotion and disease prevention. Previous studies have confirmed that Diutina rugosa SD-17 has the potential as a probiotic. We evaluated the probiotic effect of D. rugosa SD-17 on 360 one-day-old Hy-line brown chickens that were divided into 2 groups, and each group contained 6 replicate pens with 30 birds per pen. The chickens were fed with basal diet supplemented with or without D. rugosa SD-17, and the effects of D. rugosa SD-17 on growth performance, intestine morphology, and immune status were assessed. Body weight was significantly improved from week 3 to 6 (P < 0.05), and the feed conversion ratio was significantly improved in weeks 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). The length of the duodenum was lengthened significantly in week 3 (P < 0.05), and supplementation of D. rugosa SD-17 significantly increased villus height and villus height to crypt depth ratio in the ileum in week 3 (P < 0.05). Expressions of tight-junction-related genes of zonula occludens-2 and occludin in the ileum were significantly increased (P < 0.05). The proliferation capacity of blood lymphocytes stimulated by concanavalin A was significantly enhanced (P < 0.05), and the proportion of helper T (Th) cells increased significantly (P < 0.05). Expressions of Th1 cell markers IL-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ and immune-related genes of IL-1β, transforming growth factor-β, and IFN-γ in ileum were significantly increased (P < 0.05). These results indicated that D. rugosa SD-17 improved the growth and regulated immunity of chickens, and could be optimized for use as a feed additive for livestock and poultry.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Diutina rugosa SD-17; growth performance; immunity; intestine morphology
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31350991 PMCID: PMC8913761 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez428
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Ingredients and nutrient composition of diets.
| Ingredient (%) | Energy and nutrient content | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 61.7 | Metabolizable energy (Kcal/kg) | 3,236 |
| Wheat bran | 4.5 | Crude protein (%) | 16.96 |
| Bean pulp | 24 | Crude fiber (%) | 3.12 |
| Fish meal | 2 | Methionine (%) | 0.49 |
| Rapeseed meal | 5 | Lysine (%) | 0.88 |
| Calcium phosphate | 1.3 | ||
| Limestone | 1.2 | ||
| Salt | 0.3 | ||
Figure 1Effects of Diutina rugosa SD-17 on growth performance in chickens. Effects of D. rugosa SD-17 on (A) BW; (B) ADFI; (C) ADG; and (D) feed conversion ratio (FCR). Control = birds fed a basal diet; D. rugosa SD-17 = birds fed a basal diet supplemented with 1 × 107 cfu/kg D. rugosa SD-17. Each mean represents 10 replicates.*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Change in intestinal length with or without D. rugosa SD-17 supplementation.1
| Intestine | Age | Control | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duodenum | 2 | 14.5 ± 0.58 | 16 ± 1.10 | 0.313 |
| 3 | 14.0 ± 0.63 | 16.78 ± 0.97 | 0.023 | |
| 4 | 16.67 ± 0.82 | 19.44 ± 1.13 | 0.023 | |
| Jejunum | 2 | 31.75 ± 1.71 | 29.17 ± 2.79 | 0.084 |
| 3 | 38.33 ± 3.62 | 39.44 ± 3.36 | 0.359 | |
| 4 | 38.67 ± 1.97 | 40.89 ± 3.41 | 0.069 | |
| Ileum | 2 | 21.5 ± 3.00 | 23.00 ± 2.53 | 0.313 |
| 3 | 27.00 ± 1.58 | 28.78 ± 1.99 | 0.167 | |
| 4 | 32.83 ± 3.06 | 32.89 ± 2.15 | 0.963 |
Results are reported as the means ± SD.
Each mean represents the data of 6 birds.
Effects of level of supplementation of D. rugosa SD-17 on small intestinal morphology in chickens.
| Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Duodenum | |||
| VH | 1262.2 ± 77.74 | 1294.1 ± 15.86 | 0.245 |
| CD | 318.2 ± 11.85 | 306.3 ± 21.02 | 0.661 |
| VH/CD ratio | 3.97 ± 0.15 | 4.23 ± 0.24 | 0.129 |
| Jejunum | |||
| VH (μm) | 828.3 ± 28.52 | 845.7 ± 32.11 | 0.520 |
| CD (μm) | 119.2 ± 8.49 | 123.83 ± 6.17 | 0.865 |
| VH/CD ratio | 6.95 ± 0.25 | 6.83 ± 0.09 | 0.472 |
| Ileum | |||
| VH (μm) | 409.6 ± 29.34 | 477.0 ± 50.72 | 0.019 |
| CD (μm) | 103.2 ± 7.76 | 103.0 ± 17.39 | 0.993 |
| VH/CD ratio | 3.97 ± 0.04a | 4.66 ± 0.30b | 0.001 |
Results are reported as the means ± SD.
Villus height.
Crypt depth.
Figure 2Expression of tight-junction-related genes in the colon, ileum, and cecum of chickens. (A) Zonula occludens (ZO)-1, (B) ZO-2, (C) β-catenin, (D) E-cadherin, (E) claudin-1, (F) claudin-3, (G) claudin-5, and (H) occludin. The fold change represents gene expression in diet with D. rugosa SD-17 compared to that of the controls. Bars represent the mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments, *P < 0.05.
Figure 3(A) T-lymphocyte sorting through fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). Each dot in the plot indicates a single cell. (B) The percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in the blood. (C) Blood lymphocyte proliferation responses to ConA. (D) Expression of immune-related genes in blood lymphocytes of chickens. (E) Expression of immune-related genes in ileum of chickens. Con A, concanavalin A; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase. Each bar represents the mean ± SD (n = 3) and each bird sample was analyzed in triplicate. *P < 0.05.