| Literature DB >> 31350906 |
Cheng Ju1, David Benkeser2, Mark J van der Laan1.
Abstract
Many estimators of the average effect of a treatment on an outcome require estimation of the propensity score, the outcome regression, or both. It is often beneficial to utilize flexible techniques, such as semiparametric regression or machine learning, to estimate these quantities. However, optimal estimation of these regressions does not necessarily lead to optimal estimation of the average treatment effect, particularly in settings with strong instrumental variables. A recent proposal addressed these issues via the outcome-adaptive lasso, a penalized regression technique for estimating the propensity score that seeks to minimize the impact of instrumental variables on treatment effect estimators. However, a notable limitation of this approach is that its application is restricted to parametric models. We propose a more flexible alternative that we call the outcome highly adaptive lasso. We discuss the large sample theory for this estimator and propose closed-form confidence intervals based on the proposed estimator. We show via simulation that our method offers benefits over several popular approaches.Entities:
Keywords: adaptive estimation; causal inference; instrumental variables; targeted minimum loss-based estimation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31350906 DOI: 10.1111/biom.13121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometrics ISSN: 0006-341X Impact factor: 2.571