| Literature DB >> 31350351 |
Julia Fischer1,2,3,4,5, Saray Gutièrrez1,6, Raja Ganesan7, Chiara Calabrese1, Rajeev Ranjan1, Gökhan Cildir7, Nina Judith Hos1,4,6, Jan Rybniker2,3,4,5,6, Martina Wolke6, Jochen W U Fries8, Vinay Tergaonkar7,9,10,11, Georg Plum6, Adam Antebi1,12, Nirmal Robinson13,6,7.
Abstract
The dynamic interplay between metabolism and immune responses in health and disease, by which different immune cells impact on metabolic processes, are being increasingly appreciated. However, the potential of master regulators of metabolism to control innate immunity are less understood. Here, we studied the cross-talk between leptin signaling and macrophage function in the context of bacterial infections. We found that upon infection with Gram-negative pathogens, such as Salmonella Typhimurium, leptin receptor (Lepr) expression increased in both mouse and human macrophages. Unexpectedly, both genetic Lepr ablation in macrophages and global pharmacologic leptin antagonization augmented lysosomal functions, reduced S Typhimurium burden, and diminished inflammation in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, we show that leptin induction activates the mTORC2/Akt pathway and subsequently down-regulates Phlpp1 phosphatase, allowing for phosphorylated Akt to impair lysosomal-mediated pathogen clearance. These data highlight a link between leptin signaling, the mTORC2/Phlpp1/Akt axis, and lysosomal activity in macrophages and have important therapeutic implications for modulating innate immunity to combat Gram-negative bacterial infections.Entities:
Keywords: AKT; Salmonella; leptin; lysosomes; macrophages
Year: 2019 PMID: 31350351 PMCID: PMC6697794 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904885116
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.S. Typhimurium infection induces leptin signaling in macrophages. (A) Western blot analysis of LepR expression in uninfected (UI) and 1, 2, 4, and 24 h after S. Typhimurium infection in RAW-264.7 macrophages (n = 4). (B) Uptake of fluorescent leptin in UI and 24-h infected S. Typhimurium RAW macrophages measured by FACS (n = 2). (C) MFIs of fluorescent leptin-positive macrophages. (D) Confocal microscopy of fluorescent leptin uptake in UI and 1 and 24 h in RAW macrophages. (E) Relative Lepr mRNA expression in UI and 4-h S. Typhimurium-infected WT BMDM (n = 4). (F) Protein expression of phospho-Stat3 and Gapdh in WT BMDMs in UI and 1 and 4 h after S. Typhimurium infection (n = 6). (G) Western blot analysis of LepR and Gapdh expression in human macrophages of UI and 4 h after S. Typhimurium infection (n = 2). (H) Relative Lepr expression in WT BMDMs 4 h after S. Typhimurium (ST), S. flexneri (SF), P. aeruginosa (PA), E. coli (EC), Y.enterocolitica (YE), L. monocytogenes (LM), and S. aureus (SA). (I) Immunoblot analysis of phospho-Stat3. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and statistical significance calculated using Student t test and represented as *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (Scale bars: 10 μm.)
Fig. 2.Leptin signaling negatively regulates bacterial clearance and inflammation. (A) IL-6, TNF-α (B), and IL-1β (C) in supernatants of WT and Lepr BMDMs 4 h after S. Typhimurium infection (n = 3). (D) In vitro bacterial burden expressed as CFU after 30 min of S. Typhimurium infection in WT BMDMs compared with Lepr (n = 3). (E) In vitro bacterial burden expressed as fold decrease (CFU) after 24 h of S. Typhimurium infection in WT BMDMs compared with Lepr (n = 3). (F) Cell viability of 4-h S. Typhimurium-infected WT vs. Lepr BMDMs (n = 2). (G) In vivo bacterial burden expressed as CFU in the spleen from Lepr mice 4 d after i.v. S. Typhimurium infection compared with WT. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and statistical significance calculated using Student t test and represented as *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 3.Leptin signaling intrinsically regulates the ability of macrophages to eliminate S. Typhimurium. (A) Relative Lepr mRNA expression in Leprfl/fl LysMCre+/+ (LEX) compared with WT (n = 3). (B) In vitro bacterial burden after 24 h of S. Typhimurium infection in WT compared with LEX BMDMs (n = 3). (C) IL-6 expression in supernatants of WT and LEX BMDMs 4 h infected with S. Typhimurium (n = 3). (D) In vivo bacterial burden expressed as CFU in spleens from LEX versus WT mice per gram of tissue (n = 3). (E) Weight of spleens taken from LEX and WT mice 4 d after S. Typhimurium infection. (F) HE-staining of spleen tissue sections from UI and 4 d after i.v. S. Typhimurium infected WT and LEX mice. In F, *, necrosis; →, lymphoid cells. (G) Percentage of CD11b-positive cells from WT and LEX spleens 4 d after infection. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and statistical significance calculated using Student t test and represented as *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (Scale bars: 200 μm.)
Fig. 4.Leptin antagonist reduces bacterial burden and inflammation in vivo. (A) Leptin antagonist and vehicle-treated WT mice were infected with S. Typhimurium and the weights of the mice were monitored on day 1 (d-1) and day 4 (d-4) after infection. (B) On day 4, spleens were isolated and weighed. (C) Bacterial burden in the spleen was estimated, and the inflammatory cytokines TNF-α (D), IL-6 (E), and IL-1β (F) were measured by ELISA. (G) HE staining of spleen tissue sections from 4 d after i.p. S. Typhimurium-infected vehicle and leptin antagonist-treated mice. →, abscesses. (H) Bar graph showing the number of abscesses per spleen from S. Typhimurium-infected vehicle and leptin antagonist-treated mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and statistical significance calculated using Student t test and represented as *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (Scale bars: 200 μm.)
Fig. 5.Reduced S. Typhimurium burden is mediated through enhanced phagolysosomal processing in Lepr-deficient macrophages. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of WT versus LEX BMDMs infected with C12FDG-coated S. Typhimurium 4 h after infection (n = 3). Flowcytometric analysis of WT and LEX BMDMs pulsed with C12FDG-coated beads (n = 3) (B) and DQ-BSA–coated beads (n = 3) (C). Bar graphs represent MFIs of C12FDG and DQ-BSA normalized to MFIs of red fluorescence. (D) Confocal microscopy analysis of UI and 4-h infected WT and LEX BMDMs pulsed with Lysotracker and stained for S. Typhimurium LPS. (E) Bar graph shows the fluorescent intensity of Lysotracker measured with ImageJ. (F) S. Typhimurium-LysoTracker colocalization in WT and LEX BMDMs 4 h after infection. (G) Lamp-1 expression on S. Typhimurium containing phagosomes 4 h after infection. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and statistical significance calculated using Student t test and represented as *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. (Scale bars: 20 μm.)
Fig. 6.Enhanced lysosomal activity is mediated through leptin-dependent mTORC2 signaling. (A) Immunoblot analysis of mTORC2 pathway in WT versus LEX BMDMs infected with S. Typhimurium for 1 h and 4 h compared with UI (n = 3). (B) Densitometric analysis of phosphorylated Akt to Gapdh (n = 3). (C) Immunoblot analysis of mTORC2 pathway in human macrophages (n = 1). (D) Densitometric analysis of phosphorylated Ndrg1 to Gapdh (n = 3). (E) Bacterial load in Rictor siRNA transfected WT BMDMs compared with control siRNA-transfected cells infected with S. Typhimurium for 24 h. (F) Flow cytometric analysis in Rictor siRNA transfected WT BMDMs compared with control siRNA transfected cells with C12FDG-coated S. Typhimurium 4 h after infection (n = 3). (G) IL-6 expression in supernatants from Rictor siRNA-transfected WT BMDMs compared with control siRNA transfected cells infected with for 24 h. (H) Bacterial load 24 h after infection in WT BMDMs treated with 10 μM Akt-Inhibitor compared with untreated. (I) IL-6 expression in supernatants in 24-h infected WT BMDMs treated with 10 μM Akt-Inhibitor compared with untreated. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and statistical significance calculated using Student t test and represented as *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 7.Loss of leptin signaling enhances Phlpp-1-dependent dephosphorylation of Akt to enhance lysosomal function. (A) Immunoblot analysis of Phlpp1 expression in WT versus LEX BMDMs at 1 and 4 h after infection compared with UI (n = 3). (B) Densitometric analysis of Phlpp1 to Gapdh (n = 3). (C) Expression of Phlpp1 and phospho-AKT Ser473 in Phlpp1-depleted LEX BMDMs compared with control cells (n = 3). (D) Bar graph represents flow cytometric measurement of FDG-positive cells in Phlpp1-depleted LEX BMDMs compared with control cells. (E) Bacterial burden in Phlpp1-deficient LEX BMDMs compared with control cells 24 h after infection. (F) IL-6 expression in supernatants of Phlpp1-depleted LEX BMDMs compared with control cells 24 h after infection. Data are shown as mean ± SEM and statistical significance calculated using Student t test and represented as *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 8.Schematic diagram represents that leptin signaling-dependent activation of mTORC2/Phllp1/Akt pathway abrogates lysosomal function and negatively regulates macrophage defense during S. Typhimurium infection.