Literature DB >> 3135017

Family doctors and innovation in general practice.

N Bosanquet1, B Leese.   

Abstract

Family doctors have been presented with changes in government policies and incentives in a recent white paper on primary care. Little work has been done, however, to find out how general practitioners respond to such measures. The response of general practitioners to professional and economic incentives was examined in relation to the location of the practice and the characteristics of the practitioners in seven different areas of England. The areas represented urban, rural, affluent, and deprived communities. The overall response rate was 74%, but the response varied among the areas, being poorest (64%) in an inner city area. Practices were subdivided as innovative, traditional, or intermediate, according to whether they employed a nurse and participated in the cost rent scheme and the vocational training scheme. Innovative practices were defined as fulfilling two of these criteria and traditional practices as fulfilling none; the remainder were classed as intermediate. The results showed that these three types of practice had distinct strategies that were related to financial constraints and the local population. Innovative practices had more partners and were often located in rural or affluent suburban areas; traditional practices had fewer partners and were more common in urban and working class areas. Innovative practices seemed to be in the best position to increase their services, and hence their incomes, in response to the recent proposals in the white paper. Practices in areas of developmental difficulty (predominantly urban but not necessarily inner city areas) had been less able to respond to existing incentives and had a smaller margin available for developing their services. In view of the effect of local constraints of economics and population on the strategy of practices, concentrating resources for primary care in local budgets for working class and urban areas may be preferable to extending the system of charging fees for services provided by family doctors.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3135017      PMCID: PMC2545960          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.296.6636.1576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  2 in total

1.  Family doctors: their choice of practice strategy.

Authors:  N Bosanquet; B Leese
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-13

2.  Are the problems of primary care in inner cities fact or fiction?

Authors:  J Wood
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-04-02
  2 in total
  20 in total

1.  Time to counter 'fever phobia'!

Authors:  Wouter Havinga
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  An oral history of general practice. 10: Diagnostics and therapeutics.

Authors:  Graham Smith; Malcolm Nicolson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  GP pay--naming the elephants.

Authors:  Paul Hodgkin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Primary health care in London--changes since the Acheson report.

Authors:  B Jarman; N Bosanquet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-07

5.  Provision of, and patient satisfaction with, primary care services in a relatively affluent area and a relatively deprived area of Glasgow.

Authors:  S Wyke; G Campbell; S Maciver
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Coronary heart disease: preventable but not prevented?

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Practice size and service provision in primary care: an observational study.

Authors:  Claire L Morgan; Hendrik J Beerstecher
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Women's experiences of general practitioner management of their vaginal symptoms.

Authors:  T C O'Dowd; S Parker; A Kelly
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Changes in general practice organization: survey of general practitioners' views on the 1990 contract and fundholding.

Authors:  B Leese; N Bosanquet
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Correlates of asthma morbidity in primary care.

Authors:  K P Jones; D J Bain; M Middleton; M A Mullee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.