Literature DB >> 3135011

Protective efficacy of a whole cell pertussis vaccine.

M Blennow1, P Olin, M Granström, R H Bernier.   

Abstract

A trial of the efficacy of a plain whole cell pertussis vaccine was conducted in Sweden. In this non-blinded trial 525 infants aged 2 months who were born on days with an even number received three doses of vaccine one month apart and 615 infants of the same age who were born on days with an odd number were enrolled as controls. During the 18 months of follow up there were 55 cases of pertussis. The attack rate was 1.5% (8/525) among the vaccinated children and 7.6% (47/615) among the unvaccinated children (p less than 0.001). The estimated efficacy of the vaccine was 80% (95% confidence interval 58 to 90). The estimated efficacy of pertussis vaccine was similar to that observed in British trials over 30 years ago.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3135011      PMCID: PMC2545953          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.296.6636.1570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  8 in total

1.  [Systematic vaccination with combined vaccines (diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough) in infants; serological and clinical studies].

Authors:  G LAURELL; T MELLBIN; E RABO; B VAHLQUIST; P ZETTERQUIST
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1957-09-15

2.  Preliminary data from a clinical trial (phase 2) of an acellular pertussis vaccine, J-NIH-6.

Authors:  M Blennow; M Granström; P Olin; M Tiru; E Jäätmaa; P Askelöf; Y Sato
Journal:  Dev Biol Stand       Date:  1986

3.  Field evaluation of vaccine efficacy.

Authors:  W A Orenstein; R H Bernier; T J Dondero; A R Hinman; J S Marks; K J Bart; B Sirotkin
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  [Report on the adverse effects of an English whooping cough vaccine for infants based on a clinical trial].

Authors:  M Blennow; G Aurelius; P Olin
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  1984-08-22

Review 5.  The epidemiology of pertussis and pertussis immunization in the United Kingdom and the United States: a comparative study.

Authors:  J D Cherry
Journal:  Curr Probl Pediatr       Date:  1984-02

6.  [Whooping cough vaccination of children at risk].

Authors:  M Eriksson; M Granström; T Linné
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  1984-01-04

7.  Pertussis agglutinins in vaccinated children: better response with adjuvant.

Authors:  N W Preston; R I Mackay; F N Bamford; J E Crofts; W L Burland
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1974-08

8.  Neutralizing antibodies to pertussis toxin in whooping cough.

Authors:  M Granström; G Granström; P Gillenius; P Askelöf
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.226

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Toward safer and more efficient pertussis vaccines.

Authors:  A Wegmann; R Glück
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Statement on pertussis immunization. National Advisory Committee on Immunization.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Using age-stratified incidence data to examine the transmission consequences of pertussis vaccination.

Authors:  J C Blackwood; D A T Cummings; S Iamsirithaworn; P Rohani
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Can vaccine legacy explain the British pertussis resurgence?

Authors:  Maria A Riolo; Aaron A King; Pejman Rohani
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.641

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.