| Literature DB >> 31349827 |
Jonathan Perez-Meseguer1, Liliana Torres-González1,2, Jorge Aurelio Gutiérrez-González2, Gabriela Alarcón-Galván3, Homero Zapata-Chavira4, Noemi Waksman-de Torres1, Diana Patricia Moreno-Peña2, Linda Elsa Muñoz-Espinosa2, Paula Cordero-Pérez5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress and the inflammatory process are involved in ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury. Juglans mollis has been reported as having antioxidant activity, which could attenuate the damage caused by I/R. We evaluated whether a methanolic extract of Juglans mollis (JM) exhibits nephroprotective activity in a Wistar rat model of I/R injury.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Ischemia–reperfusion; Juglans mollis; Oxidative stress
Year: 2019 PMID: 31349827 PMCID: PMC6660964 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-019-2604-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Phytochemical analysis of Juglans mollis
| Chemical type | |
|---|---|
| Alkaloids | + |
| Carbohidrates | + |
| Carboxyl group | – |
| Coumarines | + |
| Flavonoids | + |
| Phenolics | + |
| Saponins | – |
| Sterols and triterpens | + |
| Quinones | + |
+, positive; −, negative
Fig. 1Changes in (a) BUN (b) Creatinine, (c) ALT, (d) MDA, and (e) SOD levels after I/R injury. Values are mean ± SD. a. p < 0.05 comparison with the sham group; b. p < 0.05, comparison with IR group
Fig. 2Serum concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines in the various experimental groups. Data are presented as mean ± SD. a. p < 0.01, comparison with the sham group; b. p < 0.001, comparison with IR group
Fig. 3Histological sections of renal tissue × 40 (H&E). Sham (a), JM (b), I/R (c), and JM + I/R (d)
Histopathological changes in all studied groups
| Experimental group | Intracellular vacualization | Medullary congestion | Proteinaceous casts | Exfoliated cells in the lumen | Tubular necrosis | Lymphocytes in peritubular capillares | Bowman’s space enlargement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 1.17 ± 0.41 | 0.17 ± 0.41 | 0.67 ± 0.82 | 0.17 ± 0.41 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.67 ± 0.52 | 0.33 ± 0.52 |
| I/R | 2.20 ± 0.45a | 3.83 ± 0.41a | 3.60 ± 0.55a | 4.00 ± 0.00a | 4.00 ± 0.00a | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 2.80 ± 0.45a |
| JM | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.71 | 0.20 ± 0.45 | 0.40 ± 0.55 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 0.40 ± 0.55 |
| JM + I/R | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 0.50 ± .83b | 2.00 ± 0.71b | 2.80 ± 0.45b | 2.00 ± 0.00b | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 0.60 ± 0.89b |
Values represent the mean ± S.D. (n = 6) of histopathological grade. Grade: no change (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), very severe (4). a. p < 0.05, comparison with the sham group; b. p < 0.05, comparison with IR group