Mechthild Westhoff-Bleck1, Lotta Winter2, Lukas Aguirre Davila3, Christoph Herrmann-Lingen4, Jens Treptau1, Johann Bauersachs1, Stefan Bleich2, Kai G Kahl2. 1. Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover, Medical School, Germany. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Germany. 3. Department of Biometrics, Hannover Medical School, Germany. 4. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Goettingen Medical Centre and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was the diagnostic evaluation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale total score, its depression subscale and the Beck depression inventory II in adults with congenital heart disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated 206 patients with congenital heart disease (mean age 35.3 ± 11.7 years; 58.3% men). Major depressive disorder was diagnosed by a structured clinical interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV and disease severity with the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale. Receiver operating characteristics provided assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Youden's J statistic identified optimal cut-off points. RESULTS: Fifty-three participants (25.7%) presented with major depressive disorder. Of these, 28 (52.8%) had mild and 25 (47.2%) had moderate to severe symptoms. In the total cohort, the optimal cut-off of values was >11 in the Beck depression inventory II, >11 in the hospital anxiety and depression scale and >5 in the depression subscale. Optimal cut-off points for moderate to severe major depressive disorder were similar. The cut-offs for mild major depressive disorder were lower (Beck depression inventory II >4; hospital anxiety and depression scale >8; >2 in its depression subscale). In the total cohort the calculated area under the curve varied between 0.906 (hospital anxiety and depression scale) and 0.93 (Beck depression inventory II). Detection of moderate to severe major depressive disorder (area under the curve 0.965-0.98) was excellent; detection of mild major depressive disorder (area under the curve 0.851-0.885) was limited. Patients with major depressive disorder had a significantly lower quality of life, even when they had mild symptoms. CONCLUSION: All scales were excellent for detecting moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Classification of mild major depressive disorder, representing 50% of cases, was limited. Therapy necessitating loss of quality of life is already present in major depressive disorder with mild symptoms. Established cut-off points may still be too high to identify patients with major depressive disorder requiring therapy. External validation is needed to confirm our data.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was the diagnostic evaluation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale total score, its depression subscale and the Beck depression inventory II in adults with congenital heart disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study evaluated 206 patients with congenital heart disease (mean age 35.3 ± 11.7 years; 58.3% men). Major depressive disorder was diagnosed by a structured clinical interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV and disease severity with the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale. Receiver operating characteristics provided assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Youden's J statistic identified optimal cut-off points. RESULTS: Fifty-three participants (25.7%) presented with major depressive disorder. Of these, 28 (52.8%) had mild and 25 (47.2%) had moderate to severe symptoms. In the total cohort, the optimal cut-off of values was >11 in the Beck depression inventory II, >11 in the hospital anxiety and depression scale and >5 in the depression subscale. Optimal cut-off points for moderate to severe major depressive disorder were similar. The cut-offs for mild major depressive disorder were lower (Beck depression inventory II >4; hospital anxiety and depression scale >8; >2 in its depression subscale). In the total cohort the calculated area under the curve varied between 0.906 (hospital anxiety and depression scale) and 0.93 (Beck depression inventory II). Detection of moderate to severe major depressive disorder (area under the curve 0.965-0.98) was excellent; detection of mild major depressive disorder (area under the curve 0.851-0.885) was limited. Patients with major depressive disorder had a significantly lower quality of life, even when they had mild symptoms. CONCLUSION: All scales were excellent for detecting moderate to severe major depressive disorder. Classification of mild major depressive disorder, representing 50% of cases, was limited. Therapy necessitating loss of quality of life is already present in major depressive disorder with mild symptoms. Established cut-off points may still be too high to identify patients with major depressive disorder requiring therapy. External validation is needed to confirm our data.
Authors: Sohail M Noman; Jehangir Arshad; Muhammad Zeeshan; Ateeq Ur Rehman; Amir Haider; Shahzada Khurram; Omar Cheikhrouhou; Habib Hamam; Muhammad Shafiq Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Tim Halling; Steffen Akkermann; Friederike Löffler; Adrian Groh; Ivo Heitland; Walter Emil Haefeli; Johann Bauersachs; Kai G Kahl; Mechthild Westhoff-Bleck Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-11-24 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Madelaine-Rachel Dering; Nicole Lepsy; Jan Fuge; Tanja Meltendorf; Marius M Hoeper; Ivo Heitland; Jan C Kamp; Da-Hee Park; Manuel J Richter; Henning Gall; Hossein A Ghofrani; Dietmar Ellermeier; Hans-Dieter Kulla; Kai G Kahl; Karen M Olsson Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Steffen Akkermann; Tim Halling; Friederike Löffler; Ann S Silber-Peest; Tillmann Krüger; Stefan Bleich; Johann Bauersachs; Kai G Kahl; Mechthild Westhoff-Bleck Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Christos Zormpas; Kai G Kahl; Stephan Hohmann; Hanno Oswald; Christopher Stiel; Christian Veltmann; Johann Bauersachs; David Duncker Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Da Hee Park; Jan Fuge; Tanja Meltendorf; Kai G Kahl; Manuel J Richter; Henning Gall; Hossein A Ghofrani; Jan C Kamp; Marius M Hoeper; Karen M Olsson Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: C Macchi; C Favero; A Ceresa; L Vigna; D M Conti; A C Pesatori; G Racagni; A Corsini; N Ferri; C R Sirtori; M Buoli; V Bollati; M Ruscica Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 8.949