Literature DB >> 31349365

Background selection and FST : Consequences for detecting local adaptation.

Remi Matthey-Doret1, Michael C Whitlock1.   

Abstract

Background selection is a process whereby recurrent deleterious mutations cause a decrease in the effective population size and genetic diversity at linked loci. Several authors have suggested that variation in the intensity of background selection could cause variation in FST across the genome, which could confound signals of local adaptation in genome scans. We performed realistic simulations of DNA sequences, using recombination maps from humans and sticklebacks, to investigate how variation in the intensity of background selection affects FST and other statistics of population differentiation in sexual, outcrossing species. We show that, in populations connected by gene flow, Weir and Cockerham's (1984; Evolution, 38, 1358) estimator of FST is largely insensitive to locus-to-locus variation in the intensity of background selection. Unlike FST , however, dXY is negatively correlated with background selection. Moreover, background selection does not greatly affect the false-positive rate in FST outlier studies in populations connected by gene flow. Overall, our study indicates that background selection will not greatly interfere with finding the variants responsible for local adaptation.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; evolutionary theory; local adaptation; population genetics-theoretical; population structure

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31349365     DOI: 10.1111/mec.15197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  18 in total

1.  Genomic islands of differentiation in a rapid avian radiation have been driven by recent selective sweeps.

Authors:  Hussein A Hejase; Ayelet Salman-Minkov; Leonardo Campagna; Melissa J Hubisz; Irby J Lovette; Ilan Gronau; Adam Siepel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Background Selection Does Not Mimic the Patterns of Genetic Diversity Produced by Selective Sweeps.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Temporal Dynamics of Background Selection in Nonequilibrium Populations.

Authors:  Raul Torres; Markus G Stetter; Ryan D Hernandez; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  The genomic origins of the world's first farmers.

Authors:  Nina Marchi; Laura Winkelbach; Ilektra Schulz; Maxime Brami; Zuzana Hofmanová; Jens Blöcher; Carlos S Reyna-Blanco; Yoan Diekmann; Alexandre Thiéry; Adamandia Kapopoulou; Vivian Link; Valérie Piuz; Susanne Kreutzer; Sylwia M Figarska; Elissavet Ganiatsou; Albert Pukaj; Travis J Struck; Ryan N Gutenkunst; Necmi Karul; Fokke Gerritsen; Joachim Pechtl; Joris Peters; Andrea Zeeb-Lanz; Eva Lenneis; Maria Teschler-Nicola; Sevasti Triantaphyllou; Sofija Stefanović; Christina Papageorgopoulou; Daniel Wegmann; Joachim Burger; Laurent Excoffier
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 66.850

5.  On the causes of geographically heterogeneous parallel evolution in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Bohao Fang; Petri Kemppainen; Paolo Momigliano; Xueyun Feng; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 15.460

6.  Genetic diversity and selection signatures in maize landraces compared across 50 years of in situ and ex situ conservation.

Authors:  Francis Denisse McLean-Rodríguez; Denise Elston Costich; Tania Carolina Camacho-Villa; Mario Enrico Pè; Matteo Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Contingent Convergence: The Ability To Detect Convergent Genomic Evolution Is Dependent on Population Size and Migration.

Authors:  James R Whiting; Bonnie A Fraser
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation.

Authors:  Tom R Booker; Sam Yeaman; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-12-15

9.  Maintenance of Adaptive Dynamics and No Detectable Load in a Range-Edge Outcrossing Plant Population.

Authors:  Margarita Takou; Tuomas Hämälä; Evan M Koch; Kim A Steige; Hannes Dittberner; Levi Yant; Mathieu Genete; Shamil Sunyaev; Vincent Castric; Xavier Vekemans; Outi Savolainen; Juliette de Meaux
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Genetic load has potential in large populations but is realized in small inbred populations.

Authors:  Samarth Mathur; J Andrew DeWoody
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.