Literature DB >> 31349277

PhD Students and the Most Frequent Mistakes During Data Interpretation by Statistical Analysis Software.

Izet Masic1, Slobodan M Jankovic2, Edin Begic3.   

Abstract

Correct choice and administration of a statistical test are absolutely essential for meaningful interpretation of research data, yet mistakes are still frequent and could be easily found in published scientific papers or PhD theses. The aim of this study was to analyze mistakes made by PhD students in statistical analysis of data collected during research within the framework of their thesis. PhD students frequently use Excel and SPSS for data processing, while SAS, Stata and R are also available. The study was designed as cross-sectional analysis of random sample (n=15) of PhD theses in pre-approval stage at Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Serbia. In total 14 (93%) theses had at least one mistake. The most frequent mistakes were as the following: insufficient statistical power due to small sample size, inappropriate presentation of results at tables and graphs, andinappropriate choice of statistical tests. In order to improve the situation, training courses in statistics during PhD studies should be re-evaluated and improved in regard to relevance, delivery methods and motivating potential, and mentors should invest more effort to review the data and guide students through statistical analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data Accuracy; Data Interpretation; Scientific Experimental Error.; Statistical

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31349277     DOI: 10.3233/SHTI190028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  4 in total

1.  Unethical Behaviors of Authors Who Published Papers in the Biomedical Journals Became a Global Problem.

Authors:  Izet Masic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2020-02

Review 2.  Evaluation of Published Preclinical Experimental Studies in Medicine: Methodology Issues.

Authors:  Slobodan M Jankovic; Belma Kapo; Aziz Sukalo; Izet Masic
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2019-10

3.  Effects of problem-based learning modules within blended learning courses in medical statistics - A randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Zoran Bukumiric; Aleksandra Ilic; Mirjana Pajcin; Dragana Srebro; Sasa Milicevic; Dragan Spaic; Nenad Markovic; Aleksandar Corac
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Evaluation of Preclinical and Clinical Studies Published in Medical Journals of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Methodology Issues.

Authors:  Slobodan M Jankovic; Izet Masic
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2020-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.