Literature DB >> 31348332

Sensory Recovery of the Breast following Innervated and Noninnervated DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Jop Beugels1, Anouk J M Cornelissen1, Sander M J van Kuijk1, Arno Lataster1, Esther M Heuts1, Andrzej Piatkowski1, Aldona J Spiegel1, René R W J van der Hulst1, Stefania M H Tuinder1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sensory recovery of the breast remains an undervalued aspect of autologous breast reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nerve coaptation on the sensory recovery of the breast following DIEP flap breast reconstruction and to assess the associations of length of follow-up and timing of the reconstruction.
METHODS: A prospective comparative study was conducted of all patients who underwent either innervated or noninnervated DIEP flap breast reconstruction and returned for follow-up between September of 2015 and July of 2017. Nerve coaptation was performed to the anterior cutaneous branch of the third intercostal nerve. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments were used for sensory testing of the native skin and flap skin.
RESULTS: A total of 48 innervated DIEP flaps in 36 patients and 61 noninnervated DIEP flaps in 45 patients were tested at different follow-up time points. Nerve coaptation was significantly associated with lower monofilament values in all areas of the reconstructed breast (adjusted difference, -1.2; p < 0.001), which indicated that sensory recovery of the breast was significantly better in innervated compared with noninnervated DIEP flaps. For every month of follow-up, the mean monofilament value decreased by 0.083 in innervated flaps (p < 0.001) and 0.012 in noninnervated flaps (p < 0.001). Nerve coaptation significantly improved sensation in both immediate and delayed reconstructions.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction is associated with a significantly better sensory recovery in all areas of the reconstructed breast compared with noninnervated flaps. The length of follow-up was significantly associated with the sensory recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31348332     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

Review 1.  Alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Paige L Myers; Jonas A Nelson; Robert J Allen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

Review 2.  Post-mastectomy sensory recovery and restoration.

Authors:  Kristy L Hamilton; Katarzyna E Kania; Aldona J Spiegel
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

Review 3.  The altering in sensory sensitivity: a current issue of female breast surgery.

Authors:  Tong Zhu; Yi Jiang; Ting Liu; Jinqi Xue; Nan Niu; Jiawen Bu; Mingxin Liu; Caigang Liu; Xudong Zhu; Xi Gu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.642

4.  Breast sensibility in bilateral autologous breast reconstruction with unilateral sensory nerve coaptation.

Authors:  Ennie Bijkerk; Sander M J van Kuijk; Arno Lataster; René R W J van der Hulst; Stefania M H Tuinder
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Flap Neurotization in Breast Reconstruction with Nerve Allografts: 1-year Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Arash Momeni; Shannon Meyer; Kerry Shefren; Michael Januszyk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-01-12

6.  Defining the Ideal Breast Reconstruction Procedure After Mastectomy From the Patient Perspective: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Ilias G Petrou; Céline Thomet; Omid Jamei; Ali Modarressi; Daniel F Kalbermatten; Brigitte Pittet-Cuénod
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2022-04-19

7.  Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes following Innervated Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Fuad Abbas; Kara Klomparens; Richard Simman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-09-28

8.  Intercostal nerve block of the anterior cutaneous branches and the sensibility of the female breast.

Authors:  Ennie Bijkerk; Anouk J M Cornelissen; Micha Sommer; René R W J Van Der Hulst; Arno Lataster; Stefania M H Tuinder
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.414

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.