| Literature DB >> 31347690 |
Ying He1, Lijun Bu2, Huadong Xie2, Guizhao Liang1.
Abstract
Previous work showed that peptides from duck eggs incubated for 15 D presented high total antioxidant activities. Here, this work explore the antioxidant activities of different segments, ZT1 (≤3 KD), ZT2 (≤10 KD), and ZT3 (≤30 KD), derived from duck embryo peptides and their protective effects against H2O2-induced oxidative damage in HepG2 cells. Peptides present no cytotoxicity to HepG2 cells. Moreover, ZT1 exhibits a higher ability to scavenge several radicals as well as stronger inhibition of H2O2-induced oxidative stress than ZT2 and ZT3. The activities of catalase and glutathione peroxidase as well as total superoxide dismutase increase in a concentration-dependent manner. Peptides are isolated from ZT1 and then subjected to LC-MS/MS to identify their sequences, followed by functional annotation, bioinformatics prediction, and hot-spot motif recognition. As a result, 413 potential functional peptides are identified, with some compounds exhibiting more than 1 function. This work will help for exploring bioactive substances in duck embryo eggs and enhance the utilization value of duck or other poultry eggs.Entities:
Keywords: HepG2 cell; antioxidant peptide; duck embryo
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31347690 PMCID: PMC8914000 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Figure 1Antioxidant capacity of duck embryo peptides in vitro.
Figure 2Toxic effects of duck embryo peptides on normal HepG2 cells (a) and protective effects of duck embryo peptides on H2 O2-induced oxidative damage in HepG2 cells (b).
Figure 3Fluorescence images of DCF in HepG2 cells. (a) Control; (b) H2 O2-treated; (c) 1 mg/mL 30 KD+H2 O2; (d) 1 mg/mL 10 KD +H2 O2; (e) 1 mg/mL 3 KD +H2 O2; (f) 5 mg/mL 30 KD +H2 O2; (g) 5 mg/mL 10 KD +H2 O2; (h) 5 mg/mL 3 KD+H2 O2; (i) 10 mg/mL 30 KD+H2 O2; (j) 10 mg/mL 10 KD+H2 O2; (k) 10 mg/mL 3 KD+H2 O2; and (l) relative expression of DCFH-DA fluorescence in different groups.
Changes in the activities of T-SOD, CAT, and GSH-px in HepG2 cells.a
| Groups | Concentration (mg/mL) | T-SOD (U/mg) | CAT (U/mg) | GSH-px (U/mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 50.29 ± 0.0028 | 38.12 ± 0.0030 | 518.21 ± 0.0021 | |
| H2 O2 | 21.93 ± 0.0120 | 14.61 ± 0.0020 | 89.02 ± 0.0033 | |
| ≤30 KD | 1 | 24.81 ± 0.0002 | 17.61 ± 0.0021 | 100.03 ± 0.0014 |
| 5 | 28.32 ± 0.0011 | 21.34 ± 0.0013 | 178.21 ± 0.0018 | |
| 10 | 30.64 ± 0.0001 | 24.29 ± 0.0016 | 225.97 ± 0.0013 | |
| ≤10 KD | 1 | 26.19 ± 0.0021 | 18.61 ± 0.0018 | 177.22 ± 0.0057 |
| 5 | 29.12 ± 0.0120 | 24.21 ± 0.0032 | 267.32 ± 0.0015 | |
| 10 | 31.86 ± 0.0032 | 26.32 ± 0.0027 | 343.89 ± 0.0022 | |
| ≤3 KD | 1 | 29.79 ± 0.0041 | 19.78 ± 0.0044 | 228.51 ± 0.0031 |
| 5 | 33.54 ± 0.0022 | 27.13 ± 0.0013 | 372.98 ± 0.0020 | |
| 10 | 36.62 ± 0.0001 | 32.39 ± 0.0032 | 432.57 ± 0.0053 |
The table shows mean values ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4GO annotation results of proteins (the results of only the top 20 in each large class are shown).
Figure 5Statistical results of functional proteins annotated by the 4 databases/methods.