Literature DB >> 31347663

Predicting outcomes in cardiogenic shock: are we at risk of having too many scores but too little information?

Teresa Lopez-Sobrino1, Hakeem Yusef2, Tony Gershlick3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31347663     DOI： 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN： 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Predictors of Prognosis in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Tamilla Muzafarova; Zuzana Motovska
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-05

2.  The Value of Prolonged QRS in Patients with Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Se Yong Jang; Dong Heon Yang
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-04-06

3.  Are Unselected Risk Scores in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Needed?

Authors:  P Elliott Miller; Jacob Jentzer; Jason N Katz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  The CSP (Cardiogenic Shock Prognosis) Score: A Tool for Risk Stratification of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Yu-Tzu Tien; Wen-Jone Chen; Chien-Hua Huang; Chen-Hsu Wang; Wei-Ting Chen; Chi-Sheng Hung; Jr-Jiun Lin; Ching-Chang Huang; Wei-Tien Chang; Min-Shan Tsai
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.