| Literature DB >> 31347551 |
Sergio Garcia-Garcia1, Sofia Kakaizada2, Laura Oleaga3, Arnau Benet4, Jordina Rincon-Toroella5, José Juan González-Sánchez1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: White matter (WM) transgression is an unexplored concept in neuroendoscopy. Diffusion tensor image (DTI) tractography could be implemented as a planning and postoperative evaluation tool in functional disconnection procedures (FDPs), which are, currently, the subject of technological innovations. We intend to prove the usefulness of this planning method focused on the assessment of WM injury that is suitable for planning FDPs.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusion tensor imaging; endoscopy; epilepsy; simulation; transgression; white matter
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31347551 PMCID: PMC6746412 DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.263199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol India ISSN: 0028-3886 Impact factor: 2.117
Parameters used for tractography and three-dimensional model criterion used for building the fascicles
| Tractography parameters | |
|---|---|
| Item | Value |
| Maximum deviation angle | 45° |
| FA threshold | 0.1 |
| Seed density | 1.00 |
| Minimal fiber length | 10 |
| 3D object distance | 1.00 |
| MPR line depth | 3 |
FA=Fractional anisotropy; 3D=Three-dimensional; MPR=Multiplanar reconstruction
Figure 1:(a and b) An 8-mm circular shape model of the virtual endoscope section was created in any random anatomical location of the simulation system. (c) Projection of circular shape to generate a cylinder. (d) Coregisteration with baseline magnetic resonance image, diffusion tensor imaging study, and oriented virtual endoscope. (e) Axial view of the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle and virtual endoscope. (f) Segmentation of the intersection object that will be used as intermediate region of interest to define the fibers injured by the virtual endoscope
Figure 2:(a-c) Left-side triplanar view of the whole inferior fronto-occipital fascicle fibers (green) and intersected fibers (red). (d-f) Right side triplanar view of the whole inferior fronto-occipital fascicle fibers (blue) and intersected fibers (red). Qualitative analysis
Figure 3:(a) Statistical information provided by the workstation. (b) Anterolateral view, multiplanar reconstruction of the uninjured inferior fronto-occipital fascicle generated with two regions of interests, frontal and occipital. (c) Same view depicting the injured fibers. Fascicle built after adding a third region of interest, the intersection, represented in both pictures in blue
Results, in terms of fibers and volume, of transgression of the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle
| Patient | Side | Fibers UT | V. UT | V. IT | Fibers DT | VDt | Percentage fibers DT | Percentage V. DT | Injured area |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 y F | R | 256 | 19.8 | 1.2 | 40 | 5.4 | 15.6 | 27.2 | IM |
| L | 232 | 17.9 | 1.1 | 36 | 5.1 | 15.5 | 28.5 | IM | |
| 66 y F | R | 100 | 16.4 | 2.3 | 70 | 13.8 | 70 | 84 | Medial |
| L | 104 | 17.1 | 1.9 | 58 | 12.5 | 55.8 | 73.1 | IM | |
| 63 y F | R | 104 | 14.6 | 1.2 | 50 | 9.6 | 48.1 | 65.7 | IM |
| L | 115 | 15.4 | 1.1 | 48 | 9.1 | 41.7 | 59.1 | IM | |
| 62 y M | R | 112 | 14.9 | 0.3 | 14 | 4.8 | 12.5 | 32.2 | IM |
| L | 105 | 12.3 | 0.4 | 13 | 4.7 | 12.4 | 38.2 | Medial | |
| 52 y M | R | 73 | 11.9 | 1.7 | 30 | 4.9 | 41.1 | 54.5 | IM |
| L | 78 | 11.2 | 1.5 | 26 | 5.1 | 33.3 | 45.5 | IM | |
| 32 y M | R | 75 | 11.4 | 0.9 | 34 | 5.1 | 45.3 | 44.7 | Inferior |
| L | 82 | 11.8 | 0.7 | 30 | 5.4 | 36.6 | 45.7 | IM | |
| 37 y M | R | 84 | 10.5 | 1.1 | 21 | 4.6 | 25 | 43.8 | IM |
| L | 75 | 10.1 | 1.2 | 20 | 4.8 | 26.6 | 47.5 | IM | |
| 54 y F | R | 107 | 16.5 | 0.9 | 32 | 7.5 | 29.9 | 45.5 | IM |
| L | 100 | 14.9 | 1.1 | 29 | 7.2 | 29 | 48.3 | Medial | |
| 50 y M | R | 56 | 10.9 | 0.3 | 14 | 4.3 | 25 | 39.4 | IM |
| L | 58 | 10.7 | 0.5 | 16 | 4.6 | 27.6 | 43 | Inferior | |
| 33 y F | R | 111 | 19.2 | 0.5 | 29 | 8.4 | 26.1 | 43.8 | IM |
| L | 115 | 19.6 | 0.7 | 31 | 8.6 | 27 | 43.9 | IM | |
| 51 y | 107.1 | 14.3 | 1.1 | 32.0 | 6.8 | 32.2 | 47.7 | ||
DT=Damaged tract; F=Female; M=Male; IM=Inferior medial; It=Intersection; L=Left; R=Right; UT=Uninjured tract; V=Volume; y=Years
Figure 4:(a) Multiplanar reconstruction representing the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle and the volume corresponding to the intersection (yellow).
(b) Three-dimensional reconstruction depicting the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle and its intersection with the endoscope in pink. (c) Coronal view showing how the endoscope injures the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle in its inferior medial aspect