| Literature DB >> 31347094 |
Shuai Jiang1, Jiaqi Wang2, Chen Yang2, Renke Tan2, Jun Hou3, Yuan Shi3, Huihui Zhang4, Shiyu Ma2, Jianan Wang5, Mengmeng Zhang6, George Philips7, Zengxia Li2, Jian Ma6, Wanjun Yu4, Guohua Wang5, Yuanming Wu8, Richard Schlegel9, Huina Wang6, Shanbo Cao6, Jianming Guo10, Xuefeng Liu11, Yongjun Dang12.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31347094 PMCID: PMC6881267 DOI: 10.1007/s13238-019-0649-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Protein Cell ISSN: 1674-800X Impact factor: 14.870
Figure 1Establishment and characterization of cell cultures from urine and tumor samples of bladder cancer. (A) Workflow of the CR method for collection of urine and tissue samples and establishment of primary bladder cancer cell cultures. Bladder cancer tissue samples were obtained from surgery or cystoscopy biopsy and the clean-catch, midstream urine samples were collected before tumor resection or before surgery into 50-mL sterile tubes after clean the urethral area of the patient. The CRCs were generated from the urine and tissue samples using cocultured with irradiated NIH/3T3 feeder cells and ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632) and the drug sensitivity were measured on clinical oncology drugs. (B) Pie charts show the classification of all urine-provided patients based on gender (left), pathology group (middle), and disease status (right). The patients enrolled include 80% (48/60) of male and 20% (12/60) of female. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounted for 72% (43/60), 27% (16/60), and 1% (1/60), respectively, among which 78% (47/60) were primary and 22% (13/60) were recurrence. (C) Cells from high grade (85.4%, 41/48) showed relatively high success rate than low grade (75.0%, 9/12) bladder cancer. Tumor grades are arranged in columns, success rates are arranged in rows. (D) Immunohistochemistry staining of urine CRCs from patient 1 and 2 and the parental tissues with the indicated markers (GATA3, P40. P63) (representative image of n = 3 independent experiments). The scale bars indicate 50 μm (CRCs) and 200 μm (tissues). UC = urine CRC; TT = tumor tissue; P = patient; (E) Correlation heat map between the variants identified in urine CRCs and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue specimens by whole-exome sequencing analysis and concordance of SNVs and indels detected in the parental tumor tissues and corresponding urine CRCs. Number of mutations are arranged in columns, patients are arranged in rows. Tumor only or concordant mutations are displayed by different colors in the bottom panel
Figure 2Correlation of drug responses of CRCs and clinical outcomes of corresponding drug-treated patients. (A) The heatmap of drug sensitivity scores (DSS) in urine CRCs derived from patient 1–13 and in urine and corresponding tumor CRCs of patient 1, 3, 4 and 6. DSS means log10 transformed fold-change of IC50 in comparison to 5637 cell line. Red represents higher DSS and blue represents lower DSS. The DSS was clustered by heatmap in R package (n = 3 independent experiments, the data indicates the mean). TC = tumor CRC. (B) The top left panel shows parts of heatmap of drug sensitivities of urine CRCs. The solid borders highlight patient 3, 5, and 7. Within the dotted borders, the patients’ dose-response curves for the indicated drugs are exhibited in the upper row, and the CT and PET-CT of the patients before and after treatment are shown in the lower row. The type of surgical treatment is shown on the black arrow and the drugs used are under the black arrow. Red circles and arrows indicate primary or recurrence tumors. Yellow circles and arrows represent response