Literature DB >> 31346645

Kidney volume loss following percutaneous nephrolithotomy utilizing 3D planimetry.

Michael Wang1, Laura Bukavina2, Kirtishri Mishra3, Amr Mahran3, Lee Ponsky3,4, Ehud Gnessin3.   

Abstract

Parenchymal damage and renal function impairment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) are of great concern. This study aims to evaluate post-operative changes in renal volume after PCNL. We retrospectively analyzed baseline and post-PCNL CT images from 25 eligible patients from a single tertiary care center. All CT imaging was reviewed using 3D planimetry software (3D Splicer®, Version 4.0). Segmentation was utilized to obtain total kidney volume (TKV), total kidney surface area, total stone surface area, and total stone volume. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for pair analysis, and univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to examine the relationships between clinical and planimetry data and renal volume loss. The median age of the cohort was 62 years, with the majority of the patients having undergone a previous PCNL (52.0%). The median TKV (cm3) pre- and post-PCNL were 225.25 and 178.09, respectively (p = 0.001), with average volume decline of 21%. While there was a statistically significant kidney volume loss in our cohort, there was no difference between pre- and post-operative serum creatinine (mg/dL): 0.93 and 0.94 (p = 0.696), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed a higher TKV loss with a larger kidney stone surface area (OR 1.002, CI 1-1.003, p = 0.035), while younger age was found to be protective (OR 0.791, CI 0.587-0.925 p = 0.028). Patients with previous history of PCNL experiences a more pronounced TKV loss (53.77 cm3, p = 0.031), as compared to PCNL naïve patients (13.05 cm3, p = 0.224). Our study consistently revealed a decrease in TKV following PCNL. Furthermore, among patients with larger stone surface areas, and history of previous PCNL there was an increase in the loss of TKV after the procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney stones; Kidney volume; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31346645     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-019-01149-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  2 in total

1.  Mini versus ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a paediatric population.

Authors:  Dilip K Mishra; Sonia Bhatt; Sundaram Palaniappan; Talamanchi V K Reddy; Vinothkumar Rajenthiran; Y L Sreeranga; Madhu S Agrawal
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2021-06-09

2.  Impact of Cluster Nursing on Nursing on VAS Score and Urinary Function of Patients after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Pneumatic Lithotripsy (PCNL).

Authors:  Zhengyuan Li; Hong Chen; Shiduo Zhao; Gangtian Yang; Wenfan Yang; Jingping Guo
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 1.781

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.