Literature DB >> 31346506

Characterization of microsatellite markers for the endangered Daphne rodriguezii (Thymelaeaceae) and related species.

Carlos García-Verdugo1,2, Juan Carlos Illera3, Anna Traveset4.   

Abstract

PREMISE: The endangered shrub Daphne rodriguezii (Thymelaeaceae) is endemic to the Balearic island of Menorca, where fragmentation and severe population decline are ongoing threats to this taxon. We developed a set of microsatellite markers to analyze the fine-scale genetics of its few extant populations. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Fifteen microsatellite markers were obtained through Illumina high-throughput sequencing and tested in two populations. Twelve of these loci showed no evidence of null alleles and were highly polymorphic, with a mean number of 8.3 alleles per locus. Levels of observed and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.100 to 0.952 and from 0.095 to 0.854, respectively. Seven to nine of these loci were successfully amplified in five other Daphne species.
CONCLUSIONS: This set of markers provides a useful tool for investigating the factors driving fine-scale population structure in this threatened species, and it represents a novel genetic resource for other European Daphne species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Daphne rodriguezii; Thymelaeaceae; fine‐scale genetic structure; island genetic diversity; paternity analysis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31346506      PMCID: PMC6636617          DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Plant Sci        ISSN: 2168-0450            Impact factor:   1.936


The genus Daphne L. (Thymelaeaceae) comprises ca. 95 species with Eurasian and North African distributions (Brickell and Mathew, 1998). Several studies have highlighted their ecological and medicinal importance (Xu et al., 2011), but the genetic information available for the genus is still scarce, particularly for the 17 European species recognized thus far (e.g., Alonso and Herrera, 2011). Daphne rodriguezii Texidor is a perennial shrub endemic to the Balearic island of Menorca. Because the species shows a highly fragmented distribution with severe population decline, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has recently reassessed its conservation status from “Vulnerable” to “Endangered” (Fraga i Arquimbau, 2017). The area of occupancy of D. rodriguezii is represented by as few as five main populations (<36 km2), all of them restricted to the eastern area of Menorca and the off‐shore islet of Colom (Calviño‐Cancela et al., 2012; Fraga i Arquimbau, 2017). Apart from its interest for biodiversity conservation, the species has been used as a model system to understand key ecological processes such as the impact of loss of dispersal agents (i.e., lizards) on the maintenance of island populations (Traveset and Riera, 2005; Rodríguez‐Pérez and Traveset, 2010). A previous phylogeographic study with plastid and amplified fragment length polymorphism data revealed a strong genetic structure among extant populations, but the unavailability of codominant markers for D. rodriguezii limited genetic inferences at the population level (Calviño‐Cancela et al., 2012). Generation of fine‐scale information with microsatellite markers for this species will provide insights on general patterns of heterozygosity across island systems (García‐Verdugo et al., 2015) and will help us understand how dispersal limitation impacts the genetic structure of small island populations (Saro et al., 2019).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Microsatellite development was conducted by Ecogenics GmbH (Balgach, Switzerland) from genomic DNA extracted from silica‐dried D. rodriguezii leaf tissue. An Illumina TruSeq nano DNA library (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) was prepared following the manufacturer's recommendations and analyzed on an Illumina MiSeq sequencing platform using the Nano 2 × 250 v2 format. A total of 1,507,789 raw reads were processed. The paired‐end reads that passed the Illumina's chastity filter were subject to de‐multiplexing and trimming of Illumina adapter residuals, and subsequently checked with the FastQC v0.11.7 software (Andrews, 2010). Following quality check, paired‐end reads were analyzed with the software USEARCH v10.0.240 (Edgar, 2010), which resulted in 99,945 merged reads that were further screened with the software Tandem Repeats Finder v4.09 (Benson, 1999). Microsatellite sequences with a tetra‐ or trinucleotide of a minimum of six repeat units (or a dinucleotide of at least 10 repeat units) were detected in 4584 merged reads. Primers were designed for 2950 microsatellite regions using Primer3 (Untergasser et al., 2012). From these candidate loci, and with the aim of optimizing marker characterization, we performed an initial step of simple sequence repeat (SSR) polymorphism testing by amplifying 36 loci in a subset of seven D. rodriguezii individuals. These loci were screened based on the motif (i.e., trinucleotide SSRs were preferred over dinucleotide SSRs), the size of the amplified fragment (for optimization of the subsequent design of multiplexed reactions), and their successful amplification in all of the samples. Considering the allele size ranges and the apparent lack of null alleles across the seven individuals tested, we finally used 15 out of the 36 loci to evaluate their usefulness in revealing polymorphism with larger (i.e., population level) sample sizes. In examining the levels of variability revealed by each SSR locus, we were constrained by the conservation status (EN) of the study species. However, we were able to obtain permissions to sample leaf material from two populations representing size extremes (Calviño‐Cancela et al., 2012): (1) the only population with more than 300 mature individuals (population A) and (2) a population with <50 individuals (population B) (Appendix 1). Genomic DNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin Plant II kit (Macherey‐Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)–lysis method. PCRs for SSR amplification were set up in 10‐μL reactions, including 1.5 μL of DNA (2–10 ng/μL), 5 μL of 2× Multiplex PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), and 0.3 μL (0.3 μM) of each primer, with the forward primer labeled with a fluorescent dye (Table 1). Reactions were performed on a G‐Storm GS2 thermal cycler (Somerton Biotechnology Centre, Somerset, United Kingdom) under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 56°C for 45 s, and extension at 72°C for 45 s; and a final extension at 60°C for 30 min.
Table 1

Characteristics of 15 microsatellite loci developed in Daphne rodriguezii.

Locusa Primer sequences (5′–3′)Repeat motifAllele size range (bp) A MultiplexFluorescent dyeGenBank accession no.
Dro012 F: CATAATGCTGACGTGGACGG (CTT)9 237–270111FAM MK507747
R: ATGGAGGCGGGAAACTTAGG
Dro019 F: CGGAGGGATTCAAACTTGGG (ATT)9 246–25854FAM MK507756
R: TGTTGACTTCAATTTTTGTGCGG
Dro025 F: TAACGGCATTGCAGGTTTTC (TA)26 157–15925FAM MK507759
R: GGGTGTATAGCCCCTACGTC
Dro028 F: TAAAAAGCGCCGGACTCAAG (TCT)12 175–19062FAM MK507752
R: AGCTGGTTCCGTACGATGAG
Dro034 F: TGGCAGTAGACAACATTAGTGG (TTA)17 199–238123HEX MK507754
R: AGACGTGCTGAAGACAGTTC
Dro035 F: AACATCGATTTCTGTCGCGG (TA)16 204–21024HEX MK507760
R: ACGGGGCTTTTTGTGCATTC
Dro041 F: GAATCCCAACTGCATCGTGG (GAT)14GG(TGA)9 240–26182FAM MK507750
R: TGGGCTTGTCATGGTAAACG
Dro042 F: AGGGTATTTCGTGGGCTGG (TTA)21 243–318173FAM MK507753
R: ACAATGTAAAAAGCAAGAAATCCAC
Dro046 F: CCCGCTTTACTTCAGTGTCG (CAT)12 180–20473FAM MK507755
R: ATCGCTAAGATTCGGGTTGC
Dro048 F: CTCCAAACCATTTCCTGAGTCG (TA)14 218–23692HEX MK507751
R: ACACCACGCCATTTAATTCTCC
Dro073 F: GACTGACGATGTCTACATGAGC (AT)21 205–21725HEX MK507761
R: GGTGGAGTACAACCATCCTTTG
Dro078 F: TTATGGGCTTAGAGCCACCG (AT)22 185–223154FAM MK507758
R: AAAGTCGCCACCGGAAAATG
Dro113 F: TTTGGCTTTGAACCATCCCG (TCT)11 114–13261FAM MK507749
R: GTCCAAACACCAACTATAATGAAAGC
Dro114 F: ACGCTTCCGCAATATGATCG (TCT)10 198–234111HEX MK507748
R: CAGACGATACTGAGGGGTGG
Dro124 F: AGAGCTTTCCAAGAATTGATGTAG (AAT)20 233–287125FAM MK507757
R: TACCCATGCACGGAGTGTG

A = number of alleles found across all D. rodriguezii samples.

Optimal annealing temperature = 56°C for all loci.

Characteristics of 15 microsatellite loci developed in Daphne rodriguezii. A = number of alleles found across all D. rodriguezii samples. Optimal annealing temperature = 56°C for all loci. To test cross‐species amplification of D. rodriguezii primers, all 15 SSR loci were amplified in closely related Daphne species (Alonso and Herrera, 2011), including leaf material freshly collected from one population of D. laureola L. and two to three replicates from herbarium samples for D. cneorum L., D. gnidium L., D. mezereum L., and D. oleoides Schreb. (Appendix 1). Rather than testing multiple samples in a closely related species, our aim was to test the cross‐amplification of loci using a broader taxonomic coverage. PCR followed the same conditions previously described for D. rodriguezii, but annealing temperatures were chosen based on a temperature gradient protocol ranging from 50–65°C for each primer and Daphne species (see Appendix 2). PCR products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with GelRed (Biotium Inc., Fremont, California, USA) and sequenced on an ABI PRISM 3130xl Genetic Analyzer sequencer using a GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). GeneMarker 2.4.0 software (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA) was used for visualizing the electropherograms and performing allele scoring. The software GENETIX (Belkhir et al., 2001) was used to obtain the number of alleles per locus and estimates of observed and expected heterozygosities. Tests for linkage disequilibrium and potential deviations from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium following a sequential Bonferroni correction for multiple tests were run on GENEPOP 4.7.0 (Rousset, 2008). MICRO‐CHECKER 2.2.3 (van Oosterhout et al., 2004) was used to assess the presence of null alleles at each locus and population. At the population level, the number of alleles per locus ranged from one to 11 (Table 2). The level of observed heterozygosity ranged from 0.000 to 0.952, and the level of expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.000 to 0.854 (Table 2). Three loci (Dro025, Dro035, Dro073) were fixed, or nearly so, for a single allele per population. The remaining 12 loci showed substantial levels of polymorphism, with a mean of 8.3 alleles per locus. Only one locus (Dro078) showed significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after sequential Bonferroni correction in population B, most probably because this was the only combination of locus and population for which null alleles were clearly identified by MICRO‐CHECKER. Significant (P < 0.001) linkage disequilibrium was found between loci Dro046 and Dro124, but only for population B.
Table 2

Genetic properties of the 15 microsatellite markers tested in two populations of Daphne rodriguezii.

LocusPopulation A (n = 22)Population B (n = 20)
N A H o b H e N A H o b H e
Dro0122190.8090.8512060.7500.772
Dro0192250.6360.6742030.4500.359
Dro0252020.1000.0952010.0000.000
Dro0282250.7720.7002060.8000.766
Dro0342180.630* 0.8101980.7000.791
Dro0352010.0000.0002010.0000.000
Dro0412260.7270.7362070.7500.741
Dro04220110.9000.77820100.7500.821
Dro0462270.5000.5932030.4500.563
Dro0482290.6000.7512070.8500.805
Dro0732110.0000.0001810.0000.000
Dro07822110.7720.8242010 c 0.550*** 0.826
Dro1132260.7720.7472050.6000.728
Dro11421110.8010.8541960.4000.441
Dro12421110.9520.8442080.6000.646

A = number of alleles detected across D. rodriguezii samples; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = number of samples tested; N = number of samples with successful amplifications.

Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.

Asterisks indicate significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction (*P < 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001).

Presence of null alleles.

Genetic properties of the 15 microsatellite markers tested in two populations of Daphne rodriguezii. A = number of alleles detected across D. rodriguezii samples; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = number of samples tested; N = number of samples with successful amplifications. Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1. Asterisks indicate significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction (*P < 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001). Presence of null alleles. In addition, this panel of microsatellites rendered positive amplifications in a minimum of seven loci per species (Table 3). The limited availability of herbarium samples per species precluded a clear assessment of the levels of polymorphism detected with these markers, but for some species (D. laureola, D. cneorum, D. oleoides), even relatively low sample sizes revealed that at least half of the amplified loci exhibited more than one allele (Table 3).
Table 3

Cross‐amplification of microsatellite markers developed for Daphne rodriguezii in five closely related species.

Locus D. laureola (N = 5) D. cneorum (N = 2) D. gnidium (N = 2) D. mezerum (N = 1) D. oleoides (N = 2)
Dro012279255251257, 271
Dro019247
Dro025156136, 151, 163152, 156, 168156154, 156, 162, 164
Dro028190235, 239, 253, 289198201, 207, 213
Dro034
Dro035204, 206205, 207192204, 206204, 206
Dro041181, 184184184184
Dro042314, 317, 320164290180
Dro046266173, 179
Dro048
Dro073205, 217205205, 217205, 217205
Dro078148, 157, 173
Dro113122107
Dro114212
Dro124155233, 253

— = unsuccessful amplification; N = number of samples tested for each species.

Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

Cross‐amplification of microsatellite markers developed for Daphne rodriguezii in five closely related species. — = unsuccessful amplification; N = number of samples tested for each species. Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.

CONCLUSIONS

The set of microsatellites characterized for D. rodriguezii is a powerful, cost‐effective tool for detecting substantial levels of genetic variation using a relatively low number of multiplexed reactions, even in small populations. Such a genetic resolution will allow us to assess parentage relationships in forthcoming studies on fine‐scale genetic structure. Additionally, the successful rates of cross‐amplification of these loci suggest that population genetic studies with these markers could be easily extended to other closely related Daphne species.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

C.G.‐V. and A.T. planned the study and collected plant tissue, J.C.I. and C.G.‐V. conducted laboratory work and allele scoring, and C.G.‐V. performed the analyses and wrote the manuscript, with input from J.C.I. and A.T.
Taxon (Population)Voucher specimen accession no.a Collection localityGeographic coordinates N
Daphne rodriguezii Texidor (popA)JBAG8300Colom, Menorca39°57.5′N, 04°16.9′E22
Daphne rodriguezii (popB)JBAG8301Mesquida, Menorca39°54.5′N, 04°17.0′E20
Daphne cneorum L.JBAG656Valle del Soba, Cantabria43°09.5′N, 03°34.1′W3
Daphne gnidium L.JBAG877Dumbría, La Coruña43°00.9′N, 09°07.4′W3
Daphne laureola L.JBAG8299Ponga, Asturias43°12.7′N, 05°05.5′W5
Daphne mezereum L.JACA78470Canfranc, Huesca42°42.2′N, 00°34.1′W2
Daphne oleoides Schreb.JBAG384La Rapa, Granada37°20.1′N, 02°50.2′W2

N = number of individuals initially assayed (some herbarium samples did not provide clear amplifications and were not used for polymorphism testing; see Table 3).

All herbarium specimens are deposited at the Jardín Botánico Atlántico herbarium (JBAG), Asturias, Spain, including one donation from the Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología herbarium (JACA), Jaca, Spain.

Locus D. cneorum D. gnidium D. laureola D. mezereum D. oleoides
Dro01255.752.6MB52.660.2
Dro01955.7
Dro02559.059.059.059.059.0
Dro02850.060.060.050.0
Dro034MB
Dro03563.659.059.059.059.0
Dro04151.050.050.050.1
Dro04255.760.051.251.2
Dro04651.250.1
Dro048
Dro07359.059.059.059.059.0
Dro07850.1MB
Dro114MBMBMB60.0MB
Dro11359.160.2
Dro12452.655.7

— = unsuccessful amplification; MB = multiple bands.

  8 in total

1.  Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences.

Authors:  G Benson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Phytochemical and biological studies of the plants from the genus Daphne.

Authors:  Wen-Cheng Xu; Jian-Gang Shen; Jian-Qin Jiang
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  genepop'007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux.

Authors:  François Rousset
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Genetic structure of the Canarian palm tree (Phoenix canariensis) at the island scale: does the 'island within islands' concept apply to species with high colonisation ability?

Authors:  I Saro; C García-Verdugo; M A González-Pérez; A Naranjo; A Santana; P A Sosa
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.081

6.  Do island plant populations really have lower genetic variation than mainland populations? Effects of selection and distribution range on genetic diversity estimates.

Authors:  C García-Verdugo; M Sajeva; T La Mantia; C Harrouni; F Msanda; J Caujapé-Castells
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Back-and-forth hermaphroditism: phylogenetic context of reproductive system evolution in subdioecious Daphne laureola.

Authors:  Conchita Alonso; Carlos M Herrera
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Primer3--new capabilities and interfaces.

Authors:  Andreas Untergasser; Ioana Cutcutache; Triinu Koressaar; Jian Ye; Brant C Faircloth; Maido Remm; Steven G Rozen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on the complete plastid genomes and nuclear sequences reveal Daphne (Thymelaeaceae) to be non-monophyletic as current circumscription.

Authors:  Shiou Yih Lee; Ke-Wang Xu; Cui-Ying Huang; Jung-Hyun Lee; Wen-Bo Liao; Yong-Hong Zhang; Qiang Fan
Journal:  Plant Divers       Date:  2021-11-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.