| Literature DB >> 31346506 |
Carlos García-Verdugo1,2, Juan Carlos Illera3, Anna Traveset4.
Abstract
PREMISE: The endangered shrub Daphne rodriguezii (Thymelaeaceae) is endemic to the Balearic island of Menorca, where fragmentation and severe population decline are ongoing threats to this taxon. We developed a set of microsatellite markers to analyze the fine-scale genetics of its few extant populations. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Daphne rodriguezii; Thymelaeaceae; fine‐scale genetic structure; island genetic diversity; paternity analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31346506 PMCID: PMC6636617 DOI: 10.1002/aps3.11274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Plant Sci ISSN: 2168-0450 Impact factor: 1.936
Characteristics of 15 microsatellite loci developed in Daphne rodriguezii.
| Locus | Primer sequences (5′–3′) | Repeat motif | Allele size range (bp) |
| Multiplex | Fluorescent dye | GenBank accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dro012 |
| (CTT)9 | 237–270 | 11 | 1 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro019 |
| (ATT)9 | 246–258 | 5 | 4 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro025 |
| (TA)26 | 157–159 | 2 | 5 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro028 |
| (TCT)12 | 175–190 | 6 | 2 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro034 |
| (TTA)17 | 199–238 | 12 | 3 | HEX |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro035 |
| (TA)16 | 204–210 | 2 | 4 | HEX |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro041 |
| (GAT)14GG(TGA)9 | 240–261 | 8 | 2 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro042 |
| (TTA)21 | 243–318 | 17 | 3 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro046 |
| (CAT)12 | 180–204 | 7 | 3 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro048 |
| (TA)14 | 218–236 | 9 | 2 | HEX |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro073 |
| (AT)21 | 205–217 | 2 | 5 | HEX |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro078 |
| (AT)22 | 185–223 | 15 | 4 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro113 |
| (TCT)11 | 114–132 | 6 | 1 | FAM |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro114 |
| (TCT)10 | 198–234 | 11 | 1 | HEX |
|
|
| |||||||
| Dro124 |
| (AAT)20 | 233–287 | 12 | 5 | FAM |
|
|
|
A = number of alleles found across all D. rodriguezii samples.
Optimal annealing temperature = 56°C for all loci.
Genetic properties of the 15 microsatellite markers tested in two populations of Daphne rodriguezii.
| Locus | Population A ( | Population B ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Dro012 | 21 | 9 | 0.809 | 0.851 | 20 | 6 | 0.750 | 0.772 |
| Dro019 | 22 | 5 | 0.636 | 0.674 | 20 | 3 | 0.450 | 0.359 |
| Dro025 | 20 | 2 | 0.100 | 0.095 | 20 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Dro028 | 22 | 5 | 0.772 | 0.700 | 20 | 6 | 0.800 | 0.766 |
| Dro034 | 21 | 8 | 0.630 | 0.810 | 19 | 8 | 0.700 | 0.791 |
| Dro035 | 20 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 20 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Dro041 | 22 | 6 | 0.727 | 0.736 | 20 | 7 | 0.750 | 0.741 |
| Dro042 | 20 | 11 | 0.900 | 0.778 | 20 | 10 | 0.750 | 0.821 |
| Dro046 | 22 | 7 | 0.500 | 0.593 | 20 | 3 | 0.450 | 0.563 |
| Dro048 | 22 | 9 | 0.600 | 0.751 | 20 | 7 | 0.850 | 0.805 |
| Dro073 | 21 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 18 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Dro078 | 22 | 11 | 0.772 | 0.824 | 20 | 10 | 0.550 | 0.826 |
| Dro113 | 22 | 6 | 0.772 | 0.747 | 20 | 5 | 0.600 | 0.728 |
| Dro114 | 21 | 11 | 0.801 | 0.854 | 19 | 6 | 0.400 | 0.441 |
| Dro124 | 21 | 11 | 0.952 | 0.844 | 20 | 8 | 0.600 | 0.646 |
A = number of alleles detected across D. rodriguezii samples; H e = expected heterozygosity; H o = observed heterozygosity; n = number of samples tested; N = number of samples with successful amplifications.
Locality and voucher information are provided in Appendix 1.
Asterisks indicate significant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction (*P < 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001).
Presence of null alleles.
Cross‐amplification of microsatellite markers developed for Daphne rodriguezii in five closely related species.
| Locus |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dro012 | — | 279 | 255 | 251 | 257, 271 |
| Dro019 | — | — | 247 | — | — |
| Dro025 | 156 | 136, 151, 163 | 152, 156, 168 | 156 | 154, 156, 162, 164 |
| Dro028 | 190 | 235, 239, 253, 289 | 198 | — | 201, 207, 213 |
| Dro034 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dro035 | 204, 206 | 205, 207 | 192 | 204, 206 | 204, 206 |
| Dro041 | 181, 184 | 184 | 184 | — | 184 |
| Dro042 | 314, 317, 320 | — | 164 | 290 | 180 |
| Dro046 | 266 | — | 173, 179 | — | — |
| Dro048 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dro073 | 205, 217 | 205 | 205, 217 | 205, 217 | 205 |
| Dro078 | — | 148, 157, 173 | — | — | — |
| Dro113 | — | — | — | 122 | 107 |
| Dro114 | — | — | — | 212 | — |
| Dro124 | 155 | — | — | — | 233, 253 |
— = unsuccessful amplification; N = number of samples tested for each species.
Voucher and locality information are provided in Appendix 1.
| Taxon (Population) | Voucher specimen accession no. | Collection locality | Geographic coordinates |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| JBAG8300 | Colom, Menorca | 39°57.5′N, 04°16.9′E | 22 |
|
| JBAG8301 | Mesquida, Menorca | 39°54.5′N, 04°17.0′E | 20 |
|
| JBAG656 | Valle del Soba, Cantabria | 43°09.5′N, 03°34.1′W | 3 |
|
| JBAG877 | Dumbría, La Coruña | 43°00.9′N, 09°07.4′W | 3 |
|
| JBAG8299 | Ponga, Asturias | 43°12.7′N, 05°05.5′W | 5 |
|
| JACA78470 | Canfranc, Huesca | 42°42.2′N, 00°34.1′W | 2 |
|
| JBAG384 | La Rapa, Granada | 37°20.1′N, 02°50.2′W | 2 |
N = number of individuals initially assayed (some herbarium samples did not provide clear amplifications and were not used for polymorphism testing; see Table 3).
All herbarium specimens are deposited at the Jardín Botánico Atlántico herbarium (JBAG), Asturias, Spain, including one donation from the Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología herbarium (JACA), Jaca, Spain.
| Locus |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dro012 | 55.7 | 52.6 | MB | 52.6 | 60.2 |
| Dro019 | — | 55.7 | — | — | — |
| Dro025 | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 |
| Dro028 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | — | 50.0 |
| Dro034 | — | — | MB | — | — |
| Dro035 | 63.6 | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 |
| Dro041 | 51.0 | 50.0 | 50.0 | — | 50.1 |
| Dro042 | — | 55.7 | 60.0 | 51.2 | 51.2 |
| Dro046 | — | 51.2 | 50.1 | — | — |
| Dro048 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dro073 | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 | 59.0 |
| Dro078 | 50.1 | — | MB | — | — |
| Dro114 | MB | MB | MB | 60.0 | MB |
| Dro113 | — | — | — | 59.1 | 60.2 |
| Dro124 | — | — | 52.6 | — | 55.7 |
— = unsuccessful amplification; MB = multiple bands.