| Literature DB >> 31346228 |
Jungjae Park1,2, Jinheum Park3, Sangheon Yi4,5, Jin Cheul Kim6, Eunmi Lee6, Jieun Choi3.
Abstract
Holocene abrupt cooling events have long attracted attention in academia due to public concern that similar rapid changes may reappear in the near future. Thus, considerable progress has been made toward understanding these short-term cooling events in the Northern Hemisphere, particularly in Europe and North America. However, few relevant studies have been conducted in coastal East Asia due to a lack of undisturbed sample materials appropriate for paleoclimate studies. In this study, we examinedEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31346228 PMCID: PMC6658530 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47264-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Locations of the study site (yellow star) and paleoclimate records used in this study: site MD98-2181, Mindanao, Philippines[58] and Dongge Cave, southern China[57] (See Fig. 7). (b) Location of the coring site (red square), Gwangyang-si, South Korea. These two location maps were created using GMRT Map tool (www.gmrt.org/GMRTMapTool/)[115]. (c) Coring location (red square). The bird’s-eye view image was generated using Google Earth (www.google.co.kr/intl/ko/earth/).
Figure 7Comparison of the Dongge Cave δ18O records[57] (a), arboreal pollen percentages from this study (b), and reconstructed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) of the western tropical Pacific (WTP)[58] (c). Drying events are indicated by yellowish boxes, with their approximate ages. All the proxy data were detrended, smoothed, and normalized (see the methods section for details). This diagram was produced using pro Fit 7.0.7 software (www.quansoft.com).
Radiocarbon dates for GY-1 sediments. Calibration was carried out with Clam 2.2 software[110].
| Sample Depth (cm) | Material dated | Laboratory No. | δ13C | Age (14C yr BP) | Two σ age range (cal yr BP) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 363 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170355 | −26.2 | 1800 +/− 30 | 1625–1819 |
| 739 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170356 | −24.7 | 2810 +/− 30 | 2846–2997 |
| 889 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170357 | −30.9 | 4150 +/− 30 | 4578–4825 |
| 917 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170358 | −26.8 | 6100 +/− 40 | 6863–7157 |
| 1416 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170359 | −26 | 7210 +/− 40 | 7956–8158 |
| 1839 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170360 | −32.1 | 7900 +/− 40 | 8595–8976 |
| 2060 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170361 | −27.9 | 7960 +/− 40 | 8649–8990 |
| 2351 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170362 | −27.4 | 8030 +/− 40 | 8764–9024 |
| 2892 | Plant fragments | KGM-IWd170363 | −27.2 | 8870 +/− 40 | 9785–10173 |
Figure 2A digital image of the 32-m-long GY-1 sediment core.
Figure 3(a) Stratigraphy and mean grain size of the GY-1 sediment core. (b) GY-1 core age depth profile. The best age model (black line) with a 95% confidence interval (gray shading) was established based on linear interpolation between dated levels using Clam 2.2. Red dotted lines show boundaries of sections divided according to physical properties of sediments and sedimentation rates. This diagram was produced using pro Fit 7.0.7 software (www.quansoft.com).
Figure 4GY-1 sediment total organic carbon/total nitrogen (C/N) ratio (a), pollen concentration (b), total organic carbon (TOC) (c), total nitrogen (d), mean grain size (e), and stratigraphy and sedimentation rates (f). This diagram was produced using pro Fit 7.0.7 software (www.quansoft.com).
Figure 5Selected pollen taxa from GY-1 sediments. All percentages are based on the total nonaquatic taxa sum. Gray shading indicates a 5 × exaggeration.
Figure 6The arboreal pollen percentage (AP) diagram. Drying events are indicated by yellowish boxes; the period of human disturbance is indicated by a reddish-brown box.
The correlations between our AP data and Dongge δ18O data[57] and WTP SST reconstruction[58]. These proxy records were all detrended, smoothed, and normalized. The numbers in parenthesis represent the 95% confidence interval calculated by Pearson T3, designed for estimating the correlation between unevenly-spaced auto-correlated data[114]
| Time period | GY-1 AP | |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 ka–10.2 ka | Dongge δ18O | −0.204 (−0.582; 0.247) |
| WTP SSTs | 0.287 (0.142; 0.419) | |
| 1.6 ka–5.6 ka | Dongge δ18O | 0.053 (−0.149; 0.251) |
| WTP SSTs | 0.346 (0.040; 0.592) | |
| 5.6 ka–10.2 ka | Dongge δ18O | −0.543(−0.846; −0.024) |
| WTP SSTs | 0.156 (−0.013; 0.317) |
Figure 8Auto spectral analysis of the GY-1 arboreal pollen percentage (AP) (a). Cross spectral analyses between GY-1 AP and western tropical Pacific sea surface temperature (WTP SST) reconstruction data (b) and between GY-1 AP and Dongge δ18O data (c). Significant periodicities are labelled in years. This diagram was produced using pro Fit 7.0.7 software (www.quansoft.com).
Figure 9Comparison of the GY-1 arboreal pollen percentage (AP) (a) and normalized summed probability distribution (SPD) of radiocarbon dates[98] (b). Drying events are indicated by yellowish boxes. The red curve in (b) represents logarithmic SPD values. Note the log scale on the right Y-axis. This diagram was produced using pro Fit 7.0.7 software (www.quansoft.com).