Literature DB >> 31346068

UK tobacco price increases: driven by industry or public health?

Rosemary Hiscock1, J Robert Branston2, Timea R Partos3, Ann McNeill3, Sara C Hitchman3, Anna B Gilmore1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tobacco companies claim that higher taxes will force smokers into buying illicit tobacco, but if they were truly concerned about increasing illicit sales with higher prices they would only increase retail prices in line with changes in taxation. In this paper, we explore UK pricing of both factory-made cigarettes (FM) and roll-your-own tobacco (RYO) to explore the extent to which price increases were due to government tax rises or industry strategies to increase profit per pack.
METHOD: Nielsen commercial data on UK tobacco sales data (2010-2015) were combined with official UK data on inflation and tax rates, to identify the source of real price increases.
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2012, when there were unexpected large tax increases, industry driven price changes were small (16% of the price rise in FM and 20% in RYO), and changes were similar between market segments. Between 2013 and 2015, when tax increases were smaller and expected, industry behaviour generally accounted for a larger share of price rises (33% FM, 48% RYO), but changes varied considerably by segment.
CONCLUSION: The industry has increased its prices beyond that required by tax changes, even when tax rises were larger and unexpected, although were notably smaller in such conditions. This suggests (1) that the industry is not actually concerned by the threat of illicit, especially since RYO had the highest levels of industry driven price increases despite higher levels of illicit, and (2) there remains scope for further tax increases, which should be relatively large and unexpected. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hand-rolled/RYO tobacco; illegal tobacco products; price; taxation; tobacco industry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31346068     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-054969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  5 in total

1.  Using Regulatory Stances to See All the Commercial Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Alex C Liber
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Standardised packaging, minimum excise tax, and RYO focussed tax rise implications for UK tobacco pricing.

Authors:  Rosemary Hiscock; Nicole H Augustin; J Robert Branston; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Anticipated responses to a hypothetical minimum price for cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco: an online cross-sectional survey with cigarette smokers and ex-smokers in the UK.

Authors:  Nathan Critchlow; Crawford Moodie; Catherine Best; Martine Stead
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Industry profits continue to drive the tobacco epidemic: A new endgame for tobacco control?

Authors:  J Robert Branston
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2021-06-10

5.  Quantile regression of tobacco tax pass-through in the UK 2013-2019. How have manufacturers passed through tax changes for different tobacco products?

Authors:  Luke Brian Wilson; Robert Pryce; Rosemary Hiscock; Colin Angus; Alan Brennan; Duncan Gillespie
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 7.552

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.