| Literature DB >> 31345780 |
Elizabeth Shephard1, Daniel Fatori2, Larissa Rezende Mauro2, Mauro V de Medeiros Filho2, Marcelo Q Hoexter2, Anna M Chiesa3, Lislaine A Fracolli3, Helena Brentani2, Alexandre A Ferraro2, Charles A Nelson4, Euripedes C Miguel2, Guilherme V Polanczyk5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescent motherhood remains common in developing countries and is associated with risk factors that adversely impact infant neurodevelopment, including poverty, low maternal education, and increased maternal psychopathology. Yet, no published work has assessed how these factors affect early brain development in developing countries.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent motherhood; EEG; Infancy; Maternal psychopathology; Neurocognitive development; Oscillatory activity
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31345780 PMCID: PMC6863387 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging ISSN: 2451-9022
Sample Characteristics
| Recruited Sample ( | Analysis Sample ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention/Control | 25/25 | 17/14 |
| Maternal Measures at Baseline | ||
| Age, years | 16.86 (1.37) | 16.61 (1.54) |
| SES C/DE | 32/18 | 19/12 |
| Anxiety, BAI | 10.68 (7.56) | 12.29 (8.02) |
| Depression, BDI-II | 13.22 (7.73) | 14.45 (8.18) |
| ADHD, ASRS | 24.30 (10.85) | 25.74 (11.74) |
| Maternal education level: L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 | 0, 7, 38, 5, 0 | 0, 6, 22, 3, 0 |
| Infant Measures at 6 Months | ||
| Sex, girls/boys | 22/28 | 15/16 |
| Age, weeks | 26.76 (1.12) | 26.74 (1.15) |
| Bayley Cognitive Composite | 101.70 (11.19) | 100.48 (10.52) |
| Bayley Language Composite | 88.76 (12.55) | 90.42 (7.75) |
| Bayley Motor Composite | 101.02 (11.50) | 100.10 (11.34) |
| IBQ-R Negative Affect | 3.96 (0.87) | 4.03 (0.85) |
| IBQ-R Orienting/Regulation | 5.13 (0.67) | 5.08 (0.67) |
| EEG resting-state epochs | – | 46.81 (18.93) |
Values are presented as n or mean (SD).
ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; ASRS, Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale total score; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory total score; Bayley, Bayley Infant Scales of Development III; BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory II total score; EEG, electroencephalography; IBQ-R, Infant Behavior Questionnaire—Revised; L1, illiterate or elementary school incomplete, L2, elementary school complete or middle school incomplete; L3, middle school complete or high school incomplete; L4, high school complete or university incomplete; L5, university complete; SES C/DE, socioeconomic status class C or DE.
Statistical Test Results for Cluster-based Permutation Tests and Network-Based Statistic
| Significant Association (Covarying Group) | Cluster Statistic (Effect Size) | Network Statistic (Effect Size) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal Anxiety and Infant Absolute Theta Power | 30 | 44.83 (0.42) | – |
| Maternal ADHD and Infant Absolute Theta Power | 30 | 43.55 (0.46) | – |
| Maternal Anxiety and Infant Relative Theta Power | 30 | 134.18 (0.46) | – |
| Maternal ADHD and Infant Relative Theta Power | 30 | 102.57 (0.51) | – |
| Maternal Anxiety and Infant Alpha Connectivity | 30 | – | 3.47 (0.62) |
| Maternal Education and Infant Alpha Connectivity | 30 | – | 3.41 (0.61) |
| Infant Negative Affect and Relative Alpha Power | 30 | 17.75 (0.40) | – |
ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Dashes indicate that cluster or network statistics were not reported because the association was not significant. See the Supplement for full details of the procedure for computing the cluster and network statistics and effect size estimates.
The maximum cluster statistic (summed cluster statistics) that was subjected to permutation testing in cluster-based permutation tests and its effect size (Cohen’s d estimate).
The average network statistic for the significant connections in networks identified by network-based statistic and its effect size (Cohen’s d estimate).
Figure 1Associations between infant absolute power and maternal anxiety and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Topographical plots (left) show the clusters of electrodes (indicated by × signs) at which infants’ absolute oscillatory power in the theta frequency was significantly positively associated with maternal anxiety (A) and ADHD (B) symptoms. Color bars represent the statistical strength (T value) of the association between oscillatory power at different scalp regions and maternal anxiety or ADHD, with higher T values reflecting a stronger statistical association. Scatterplots (right) display the positive associations between absolute theta power in the significant clusters and maternal anxiety (A) and ADHD (B). Note that absolute power values are large owing to the Laplacian transform applied to the data prior to computation of spectral power (μv2). ASRS, Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory.
Figure 2Associations between infant relative power and maternal anxiety and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Topographical plots (left) show the clusters of electrodes (indicated by × signs) at which infants’ relative oscillatory power in the theta frequency was significantly positively associated with maternal anxiety (A) and ADHD (B) symptoms. Color bars represent the statistical strength (T value) of the association between oscillatory power at different scalp regions and maternal anxiety or ADHD, with higher T values reflecting a stronger statistical association. Scatterplots (right) display the positive associations between absolute theta power in the significant clusters and maternal anxiety (A) and ADHD (B). ASRS, Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale; BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory.
Figure 3Associations between infant oscillatory network connectivity and maternal anxiety and education level. (A) Connectivity, quantified by debiased weighted phase lag index (dwPLI), was significantly negatively associated with maternal anxiety in the oscillatory network (left) in the alpha frequency. Black circles represent the nodes (electrodes) of the network and blue lines represent the edges (functional connections between nodes, indexed by oscillatory synchrony–dwPLI). All edges in the network showed reduced dwPLI (reduced connectivity) in association with greater maternal anxiety symptoms. The networks were visualized using BrainNet Viewer (48). The scatterplot (right) displays the negative association between connectivity (average dwPLI in the network) and maternal anxiety symptoms. Note that the dwPLI can take small negative values due to the debiasing procedure. (B) The oscillatory network in the alpha frequency (left) was significantly associated with maternal education level. All connections in this network showed weaker connectivity (lower dwPLI values) in association with lower levels of maternal education, as illustrated in the scatterplot to the right. BAI, Beck Anxiety Inventory; L, left; R, right.
Figure 4Associations between infant electroencephalography and cognitive-behavioral abilities. (A) The positive association between infants’ relative alpha power and level of negative affect is shown; the topographical plot displays the clusters of electrodes (indicated by × signs) at which this association was significant (color bar indicates the statistical strength—T value—of this association) and scatterplot displays the positive association between relative theta power in the significant clusters and infant negative affect scores. (B) Significant association between infant cognition and connectivity in the alpha-range network that was associated with maternal anxiety symptoms; weaker connectivity was associated with lower cognitive ability. (C) The plot shows the significant association between infant attentional and regulatory ability and whole-brain theta connectivity; better attention and regulation was associated with stronger connectivity across all electrodes. Note that the debiased weighted phase lag index (dwPLI) can take small negative values due to the debiasing procedure.