Literature DB >> 31345111

Physical demands of elite basketball during an official U18 international tournament.

Jairo Vázquez-Guerrero1, Ben Jones2,3,4,5,6,7, Bruno Fernández-Valdés8,9, Gerard Moras8, Xavi Reche1, Jaime Sampaio10.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were (a) to compare players' physical demands between different playing positions in elite U18 basketball games and (b) to identify different clusters of performance. Data were collected from 94 male subjects (age: 17.4 ± 0.7 years), competing in a Euroleague Basketball Tournament. Guards covered a greater relative distance than centres and forwards (small to moderate effect). Forwards and guards had more peak accelerations, high accelerations and high decelerations than centres (moderate to large effects). A cluster analysis allowed to classify all cases into three different groups (Lower, Medium and Higher activity demands), containing 37.4%, 52.8% and 9.8% of the cases, respectively. The high accelerations, high decelerations, peak accelerations and total distance covered were the variables that most contributed to classify the players into the new groups. The percentage of cases distributed in the clusters according to playing position, game type (worst vs worst, mixed opposition, best vs best) and team were different. Centres have lower physical demands specially related with the number of accelerations and decelerations at high intensity and the peak acceleration when compared with guards. Each team has a different activity profile, that does not seem to influence the tournament outcome.

Keywords:  Acceleration; game analysis; inertial movement sensors; team sport

Year:  2019        PMID: 31345111     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1647033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  7 in total

1.  Differences in Physical Demands between Game Quarters and Playing Positions on Professional Basketball Players during Official Competition.

Authors:  Franc García; Jairo Vázquez-Guerrero; Julen Castellano; Martí Casals; Xavi Schelling
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Contribution of Plantar Fascia and Intrinsic Foot Muscles in a Single-Leg Drop Landing and Repetitive Rebound Jumps: An Ultrasound-Based Study.

Authors:  Masanori Morikawa; Noriaki Maeda; Makoto Komiya; Arisu Hirota; Rami Mizuta; Toshiki Kobayashi; Kazuki Kaneda; Yuichi Nishikawa; Yukio Urabe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Using Metabolomics to Differentiate Player Positions in Elite Male Basketball Games: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kayvan Khoramipour; Abbas Ali Gaeini; Elham Shirzad; Kambiz Gilany; Karim Chamari; Øyvind Sandbakk
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-05-13

4.  Criterion Validity of Catapult ClearSky T6 Local Positioning System for Measuring Inter-Unit Distance.

Authors:  Ryan W Hodder; Kevin A Ball; Fabio R Serpiello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Does Acute Beetroot Juice Supplementation Improve Neuromuscular Performance and Match Activity in Young Basketball Players? A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Álvaro López-Samanes; Aarón Gómez Parra; Victor Moreno-Pérez; Javier Courel-Ibáñez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Want to Impact Physical, Technical, and Tactical Performance during Basketball Small-Sided Games in Youth Athletes? Try Differential Learning Beforehand.

Authors:  Sogand Poureghbali; Jorge Arede; Kathrin Rehfeld; Wolfgang Schöllhorn; Nuno Leite
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The Distribution of Match Physical Activities Relative to the Most Demanding Scenarios in Professional Basketball Players.

Authors:  Franc García; Daniel Fernández; Jordi Illa; Xavier Reche; Jairo Vázquez-Guerrero
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.