| Literature DB >> 31344801 |
Fang Wang1, Min Lu2, Shujue Zhou2, Zhisong Lu2, Siyan Ran3.
Abstract
In this work, bamboo fibers are chemically modified with NaOH solution of 1, 4, and 7 wt% concentrations at room temperature, respectively, and subsequently the untreated and treated fibers are prepared with epoxy resin for unidirectional composites by hot pressing molding technique. Tensile and micro-bond tests are conducted on the composite specimens to obtain mechanical properties, such as tensile strength and modulus, elongation at break, and interfacial strength. Besides, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is employed to perform morphological observations for constituent damages. In addition, the influence of alkali concentration on the thermal performance of epoxy-based composites is examined by using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. It is found that composite tensile strength reaches the maximum when the alkali concentration is 4%, increased by 45.24% compared with untreated composites. The composite elongation at break increases on increasing the concentration. Inversely, the composite modulus decreases as the concentration increases. Besides, the results demonstrate that the chemical treatment on the fiber surface could improve interface adhesion, as observed from its topography by SEM. Micro-bond test reveals that there is maximum interfacial shear strength when the alkali concentration is 4%, which increases by 100.30% in comparison with the untreated samples. In case of thermal properties, the DSC analysis indicates that the glass transition temperature is maximized at 4% alkali concentration, which is increased by 12.95%, compared to those from unmodified fibers. In addition, TG results show that the 4% concentration also facilitates thermal stability improvement, indicative of superior interfacial bonding.Entities:
Keywords: alkali treatment; interfacial bonding; mechanical properties; natural fiber composites; thermal performance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31344801 PMCID: PMC6696082 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24152682
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Mechanical properties of composites treated with various alkali concentrations.
| Samples | Tensile Strength (MPa) | SD | Tensile Modulus (GPa) | SD | Elongation at Break (%) | SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 134.32 ± 19.77 | - | - | 0.82 ± 0.13 | - | - | 4.46 ± 0.10 | - | - |
| 1% | 158.20 ± 11.63 | 0.048 | Yes | 0.77 ± 0.05 | 0.268 | No | 5.17 ± 0.19 | 0.027 | Yes |
| 4% | 195.09 ± 17.91 | 0.007 | Yes | 0.72 ± 0.02 | 0.031 | Yes | 5.50 ± 0.32 | 0.002 | Yes |
| 7% | 173.17 ± 19.38 | 0.031 | Yes | 0.66 ± 0.04 | 0.012 | Yes | 6.32 ± 0.33 | 0.002 | Yes |
Note: Two-sided t-test in ANOVA, and α is the significant level. For p ≥ 0.05, there is no significant difference (SD).
Figure 1Interfacial morphology of epoxy-based composites.
Figure 2Interface fracture morphology of epoxy-based composites treated with various alkali concentrations of (a) 0%; (b) 1%; (c) 4%; and (d) 7%.
Figure 3Interfacial morphology of epoxy-based composites.
IFSS for the epoxy resin with bamboo fibers treated with various alkali concentrations.
| Samples | IFSS (MPa) | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 3.28 ± 0.34 | - | - |
| 1% | 4.29 ± 0.56 | 0.009 | Yes |
| 4% | 6.57 ± 0.69 | 0.0001 | Yes |
| 7% | 5.04 ± 0.32 | 0.00002 | Yes |
Note: Two-sided t-test in ANOVA, and α is the significant level. For p ≥ 0.05, there is no significant difference (SD).
Figure 4Interface morphology of epoxy-based composites treated with various alkali concentrations of (a) 0%; (b) 1%; (c) 4%; and (d) 7%.
Figure 5DSC curves of epoxy-based composites treated with various alkali concentrations for: (a) the first heating; (b) the cooling; and (c) the second heating process.
Glass transition temperature of epoxy-based composites treated with various alkali concentrations.
| Samples | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 109.37 ± 0.87 | - | - |
| 1% | 112.62 ± 1.24 | 0.021 | Yes |
| 4% | 123.54 ± 2.22 | 0.0005 | Yes |
| 7% | 116.76 ± 0.81 | 0.0004 | Yes |
Note: Two-sided t-test in ANOVA, and α is the significant level. For p ≥ 0.05, there is no significant difference (SD).
Figure 6(a) TG; and (b) DTG curves of bamboo fibers and epoxy-based composites treated with various alkali concentrations.
Comparison of peak temperature and weight loss of epoxy-based composites treated with various alkali concentrations.
| Samples | Peak Temperature (°C) | SD | Loss Weight at 600 °C (%) | SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 342.4 ± 1.50 | - | - | 73.42 ± 1.28 | - | - |
| 1% | 346.4 ± 1.27 | 0.023 | Yes | 72.28 ± 0.33 | 0.015 | Yes |
| 4% | 352.5 ± 1.08 | 0.0002 | Yes | 70.65 ± 1.26 | 0.012 | Yes |
| 7% | 346.9 ± 1.54 | 0.011 | Yes | 71.22 ± 1.06 | 0.015 | Yes |
Note: Two-sided t-test in ANOVA, and α is the significant level. For p ≥ 0.05, there is no significant difference (SD).
Thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy resin sample.
| Epoxide Equivalent Weight (g/mol) | Viscosity (mPa·s at 70 °C) | Solubility | Glass Transition Temperature (°C) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Tensile Modulus (MPa) | Elongation at Break (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180–195 | 600–1000 | Insoluble in water | ≥150 | 21 | 480 | 3.8 |
Figure 7Schematic of (a) specimen preparation and (b) micro-bond test.
Figure 8Morphological image of the micro-droplet sample.