Literature DB >> 31342474

19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial.

Rafael A Ching-Companioni1, David L Diehl1, Amitpal S Johal1, Bradley D Confer1, Harshit S Khara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is a safe and effective method for accomplishing parenchymal liver biopsy. The aim of this study was to compare a 19 G aspiration needle (FNA) with a 19 G Franseen-tip core biopsy needle (FNB) for EUS-LB.
METHODS: This was a prospective, parallel group, randomized trial comparing the tissue yields and adequacy of a 19 G FNA needle vs. a 19 G FNB needle for EUS-LB. The primary outcome was length of the longest piece of liver core specimen. Secondary outcomes were aggregate specimen length, number of complete portal triads (CPTs), and adverse events. One transgastric pass and one transduodenal pass were performed with the same needle in each patient. Specimen lengths were measured before and after histological processing.
RESULTS: 40 patients referred for EUS-LB were randomized to either the FNA group (n = 20) or the FNB group (n = 20). Both groups had similar patient characteristics. FNB biopsies yielded longer mean (standard deviation) specimen lengths (pre-processing mean 2.09 cm [0.41] vs. mean 1.47 cm [0.46], and post-processing mean 1.78 cm [0.66] vs. mean 1.05 cm [0.42]; both P < 0.001), a longer aggregate specimen length (pre-processing mean 15.78 cm [5.19] vs. 10.89 cm [4.38]; P = 0.003), and more CPTs (mean 42.6 25 vs 18.1 [9.3]; P < 0.001) compared with the FNA needle. There were no severe adverse events or difference in adverse event rate between the two needles. Post-biopsy pain was noted in 37.5 %.
CONCLUSION: EUS-LB using the FNB needle delivered longer liver biopsy specimens with more CPTs than the regular (non-core) needle. Owner and
Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31342474     DOI: 10.1055/a-0956-6922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

Review 1.  A State-of-the-Art Review on the Evolving Utility of Endoscopic Ultrasound in Liver Diseases Diagnosis.

Authors:  Wisam Sbeit; Anas Kadah; Mahmud Mahamid; Rinaldo Pellicano; Amir Mari; Tawfik Khoury
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23

2.  The Evolving Role of Advanced Endoscopic Techniques in Hepatology.

Authors:  Mahmoud Mahfouz; Sunil Amin; Andres F Carrion
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2021-02

3.  EUS-guided fine-needle core liver biopsy with a modified one-pass, one-actuation wet suction technique comparing two types of EUS core needles.

Authors:  Jose Nieto; Enad Dawod; Ameya Deshmukh; Eli Penn; Douglas Adler; Sammy Saab
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-06-16

4.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the field of hepatology: Recent advances and future trends.

Authors:  Jahnvi Dhar; Jayanta Samanta
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 5.  Update on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.

Authors:  Shiva Rangwani; Devarshi R Ardeshna; Khalid Mumtaz; Sean G Kelly; Samuel Y Han; Somashekar G Krishna
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.374

6.  Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology.

Authors:  James Neuberger; Jai Patel; Helen Caldwell; Susan Davies; Vanessa Hebditch; Coral Hollywood; Stefan Hubscher; Salil Karkhanis; Will Lester; Nicholas Roslund; Rebecca West; Judith I Wyatt; Mathis Heydtmann
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 23.059

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.