| Literature DB >> 31341844 |
Yuhui Dai1,2, Zhidong Tan1, Jianhua Tan1, Lina Yan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Environmental pollution seriously damages not only the ecosystem but also the well-being of residents. There is an association between air pollution and residential health expenditures. The aim of this study was to identify the association between pollution control and residents' health expenditures.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; Regional cooperative pollution control; Residents’ health expenditures
Year: 2019 PMID: 31341844 PMCID: PMC6635326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Pilot project cities in China
| Beijing; Tianjin; Shijiazhuang, Tangshan, Baoding, Langfang, Cangzhou, Hengshui, Handan and Xingtai in Hebei Province; Taiyuan, Yangquan, Changzhi and Jincheng in Shanxi Province; Jinan, Zibo, Liaocheng, Dezhou, Binzhou, Jining and Heze in Shandong Province; and Zhengzhou, Xinxiang, Hebi, Anyang, Jiaozuo, Puyang and Kaifeng in Henan Province. | Qinhuangdao, Zhangjiakou and Chengde in Hebei Province; Datong, Shuozhou, Jinzhong, Yuncheng, Xinzhou, Linfen and Lvliang in Shanxi Province; Qingdao, Zaozhuang, Dongying, Yantai, Weifang, Tai’an, Weihai, Rizhao, Laiwu and Linyi in Shandong Province; and Luoyang, Xuchang, Pingdingshan, Luohe, Nanyang, Sanmenxia, Zhumadian, Shangqiu, Xinyang and Zhoukou in Henan Province. |
Definition of variables used in this study
| Dependent variable | He | Residents’ health expenditures | (health expenditures/consumption expenditures) *100 |
| Independent variable | Joint | The regional cooperative pollution control | 0 before the pilot project and 1 thereafter, and 0 for the control group. |
| Residents’ characteristics | Y | Disposable income | Logarithmic per capita disposable income |
| Edu | Education | Ratio of teachers to students in colleges and universities | |
| Death | Death rate | Death rate |
Characteristics of the study samples (2014–2017)
| Residents’ health expenditures | 232 | 7.231 | 0.287 | 4.112 | 7.623 | 10.236 | 12.314 |
| The regional cooperative pollution control | 232 | 0.187 | 0.381 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Disposable income | 232 | 9.047 | 1.345 | 7.939 | 9.354 | 10.021 | 10.454 |
| Education | 232 | 0.117 | 0.311 | 0.071 | 0.103 | 0.177 | 0.243 |
| Death rate | 232 | 5.964 | 0.677 | 4.213 | 5.994 | 6.423 | 7.288 |
Test of changes of air quality
| Joint | −13.421 | −11.895 | −13.554 | −5.530 | −3.584 | −0.276 | 6.181 |
| Wind | −4.853 | −6.984 | −4.459 | −4.460 | −5.500 | −0.133 | 3.691 |
| Temp_H | 2.218 | 1.208 | 3.308 | 1.377 | 1.045 | 0.010 | 1.927 |
| Temp_L | 0.970 | 1.340 | 0.381 | −1.144 | −0.378 | 0.015 | 0.145 |
| Snow/Rain | 0.799 (1.05) | 3.792 | 0.111 (0.11) | −1.488 | −0.173 (−0.80) | 0.048 | −5.128 |
| Weekend | 2.420 | 1.561 | 3.961 | 1.241 | 0.211 (1.15) | 0.003 (0.34) | 0.127 (0.43) |
| Holiday | −11.422 | −9.104 | −15.434 | −0.732 (−0.99) | −8.106 | −0.128 | 10.374 |
| Constant | 162.163 | 138.715 | 173.508 | 56.961 | 59.346 | 2.527 | 7.948 |
| Year FE | Yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Month FE | Yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Code FE | Yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| Observations | 25,252 | 25,252 | 25,252 | 25,252 | 25,252 | 25,252 | 25,252 |
| R-squared | 0.356 | 0.391 | 0.354 | 0.509 | 0.568 | 0.458 | 0.690 |
| r2_a | 0.354 | 0.389 | 0.352 | 0.508 | 0.566 | 0.456 | 0.689 |
| F | 190.7 | 221.3 | 189.2 | 357.8 | 452.6 | 291.2 | 766.5 |
Note: t-statistics are in parentheses, ***, ** and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively.
Test of changes in residents’ health expenditures
| Joint | −0.039 | −0.031 |
| Y | −0.000 (−1.01) | |
| Death | 0.003 | |
| Edu | −0.221 | |
| Constant | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Year FE | Yes | yes |
| City FE | Yes | yes |
| Observations | 232 | 232 |
| R-squared | 0.356 | 0.391 |
Note: t-statistics are in parentheses, ***, ** and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively
Dynamic test of residents’ health expenditures
| Before3 | 0.085 (0.26) | 0.068 (0.22) |
| Before2 | 0.010 (0.90) | 0.009 (0.77) |
| Before1 | −0.015 (−0.35) | −0.009 (−0.10) |
| Current | −0.044 | −0.036 |
| Constant | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Control | yes | |
| Year FE | Yes | yes |
| City FE | Yes | yes |
| R-squared | 0.223 | 0.281 |
Note: t-statistics are in parentheses, ***, ** and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively
Robustness test: Heckman’s two-stage regression
| Second | −0.006 (−0.69) | Imr | 0.104 (0.35) | 0.077 (0.20) |
| lnGDP | 0.640 | Joint | −0.037 | −0.029 |
| SO2-d | 42.262 (1.02) | Y | −0.000 (−1.00) | |
| Dust-d | −23.778 (−0.74) | Death | 0.003 | |
| Edu | −0.217 | |||
| Constant | −11.202 | Constant | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Year FE | yes | Year FE | yes | Yes |
| City FE | yes | Yes | ||
| Observations | 230 | Observations | 232 | 232 |
| R-squared | 0.352 | 0.387 | ||
Note: t-statistics are in parentheses, ***, ** and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels respectively