David S Riley1, Viktor G Lizogub2, Marianne Heger3, Petra Funk3, Heiko Mueller3, Walter Lehmacher4. 1. University of New Mexico Medical School, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. 2. Faculty Therapy No. 2, National Medical University, Kiev, Ukraine. 3. Clinical Research Department, Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4. Institut fuer Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Epidemiologie, Universitaet zu Koeln, Koeln.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: EPs 7630 was shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections such as acute bronchitis, acute rhinosinusitis, and acute tonsillopharyngitis. A clinical trial was conducted to investigate its efficacy and safety in the common cold. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 clinical trial, 105 adults suffering from common cold symptoms were randomized to a thrice-daily administration of either 1 film-coated tablet containing 40 mg EPs 7630 or matched placebo for a treatment period of 10 days. The primary outcome measure was the sum of differences in the cold intensity score (CIS) from day 1 to day 5, defined as the Sum of the Symptom Intensity Differences (SSID), indicating the degree of symptom improvement in the course of 5 days of treatment. Among the secondary outcomes were clinical cure defined as (a) complete resolution of all cold symptoms (CIS = 0 points) or (b) complete resolution of all or all but one cold symptom, treatment outcome, satisfaction with treatment, and safety parameters. RESULTS: On day 5, the mean (±SD) SSID was significantly higher in the EPs 7630 group compared with the placebo group (12.5 ± 4.4 points versus 8.8 ± 6.8 points). Moreover, 55% of patients in the EPs 7630 group rated the treatment outcome as at least "major improvement" compared with 15% of patients in the placebo group. On day 10, 45% of patients of the EPs 7630 group and 12% of patients of the placebo group had reached 0 points on the CIS (=clinical cure, definition a), whereas all or all but one symptom (clinical cure, definition b) had completely resolved in 74% (EPs 7630) and 25% of patients (placebo), respectively. Satisfaction with treatment was higher in the EPs 7630 than in the placebo group (75% vs 37%) (P values ≤ .0002). During the clinical trial, adverse events occurred in 5 patients (9.4%) in the EPs 7630 and in 7 (13.5%) in the placebo group. All adverse events were of mild intensity, with the exception of 3 events in the placebo group, which were classified as moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with EPs 7630 was shown to be superior to placebo in patients with the common cold indicating faster reduction of symptom intensity and distinctly more pronounced effects achieved by administration of the investigational drug in patients suffering from the common cold. Results extend previous findings on efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this active substance.
BACKGROUND: EPs 7630 was shown to be effective and safe in the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections such as acute bronchitis, acute rhinosinusitis, and acute tonsillopharyngitis. A clinical trial was conducted to investigate its efficacy and safety in the common cold. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind phase 3 clinical trial, 105 adults suffering from common cold symptoms were randomized to a thrice-daily administration of either 1 film-coated tablet containing 40 mg EPs 7630 or matched placebo for a treatment period of 10 days. The primary outcome measure was the sum of differences in the cold intensity score (CIS) from day 1 to day 5, defined as the Sum of the Symptom Intensity Differences (SSID), indicating the degree of symptom improvement in the course of 5 days of treatment. Among the secondary outcomes were clinical cure defined as (a) complete resolution of all cold symptoms (CIS = 0 points) or (b) complete resolution of all or all but one cold symptom, treatment outcome, satisfaction with treatment, and safety parameters. RESULTS: On day 5, the mean (±SD) SSID was significantly higher in the EPs 7630 group compared with the placebo group (12.5 ± 4.4 points versus 8.8 ± 6.8 points). Moreover, 55% of patients in the EPs 7630 group rated the treatment outcome as at least "major improvement" compared with 15% of patients in the placebo group. On day 10, 45% of patients of the EPs 7630 group and 12% of patients of the placebo group had reached 0 points on the CIS (=clinical cure, definition a), whereas all or all but one symptom (clinical cure, definition b) had completely resolved in 74% (EPs 7630) and 25% of patients (placebo), respectively. Satisfaction with treatment was higher in the EPs 7630 than in the placebo group (75% vs 37%) (P values ≤ .0002). During the clinical trial, adverse events occurred in 5 patients (9.4%) in the EPs 7630 and in 7 (13.5%) in the placebo group. All adverse events were of mild intensity, with the exception of 3 events in the placebo group, which were classified as moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with EPs 7630 was shown to be superior to placebo in patients with the common cold indicating faster reduction of symptom intensity and distinctly more pronounced effects achieved by administration of the investigational drug in patients suffering from the common cold. Results extend previous findings on efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this active substance.
Authors: Andreas Conrad; Irina Jung; Diane Tioua; Caroline Lallemand; Felipe Carrapatoso; Inge Engels; Franz D Daschner; Uwe Frank Journal: Phytomedicine Date: 2006-12-19 Impact factor: 5.340
Authors: Andreas Schapowal; Gustav Dobos; Holger Cramer; Kian Chung Ong; Martin Adler; Andrea Zimmermann; Juliette Brandes-Schramm; Walter Lehmacher Journal: Heliyon Date: 2019-11-26
Authors: Jan Papies; Jackson Emanuel; Nicolas Heinemann; Žarko Kulić; Simon Schroeder; Beate Tenner; Martin D Lehner; Georg Seifert; Marcel A Müller Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Jia Yao; Yuan Zhang; Xian-Zhe Wang; Jia Zhao; Zhao-Jun Yang; Yu-Ping Lin; Lu Sun; Qi-Yun Lu; Guan-Jie Fan Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-02-16
Authors: Peter Kardos; Walter Lehmacher; Andrea Zimmermann; Juliette Brandes-Schramm; Petra Funk; Heinrich Matthys; Wolfgang Kamin Journal: Multidiscip Respir Med Date: 2022-08-03