Literature DB >> 31341286

Flower isoforms promote competitive growth in cancer.

Esha Madan1,2, Christopher J Pelham2,3, Masaki Nagane4, Taylor M Parker2,5, Rita Canas-Marques1, Kimberly Fazio6, Kranti Shaik6, Youzhong Yuan2, Vanessa Henriques1, Antonio Galzerano1, Tadashi Yamashita4, Miguel Alexandre Ferreira Pinto1, Antonio M Palma1, Denise Camacho1, Ana Vieira1, David Soldini7, Harikrishna Nakshatri5, Steven R Post2, Christa Rhiner1, Hiroko Yamashita8, Davide Accardi1, Laura A Hansen6, Carlos Carvalho1, Antonio L Beltran1, Periannan Kuppusamy9, Rajan Gogna10,11, Eduardo Moreno12.   

Abstract

In humans, the adaptive immune system uses the exchange of information between cells to detect and eliminate foreign or damaged cells; however, the removal of unwanted cells does not always require an adaptive immune system1,2. For example, cell selection in Drosophila uses a cell selection mechanism based on 'fitness fingerprints', which allow it to delay ageing3, prevent developmental malformations3,4 and replace old tissues during regeneration5. At the molecular level, these fitness fingerprints consist of combinations of Flower membrane proteins3,4,6. Proteins that indicate reduced fitness are called Flower-Lose, because they are expressed in cells marked to be eliminated6. However, the presence of Flower-Lose isoforms at a cell's membrane does not always lead to elimination, because if neighbouring cells have similar levels of Lose proteins, the cell will not be killed4,6,7. Humans could benefit from the capability to recognize unfit cells, because accumulation of damaged but viable cells during development and ageing causes organ dysfunction and disease8-17. However, in Drosophila this mechanism is hijacked by premalignant cells to gain a competitive growth advantage18. This would be undesirable for humans because it might make tumours more aggressive19-21. It is unknown whether a similar mechanism of cell-fitness comparison is present in humans. Here we show that two human Flower isoforms (hFWE1 and hFWE3) behave as Flower-Lose proteins, whereas the other two isoforms (hFWE2 and hFWE4) behave as Flower-Win proteins. The latter give cells a competitive advantage over cells expressing Lose isoforms, but Lose-expressing cells are not eliminated if their neighbours express similar levels of Lose isoforms; these proteins therefore act as fitness fingerprints. Moreover, human cancer cells show increased Win isoform expression and proliferate in the presence of Lose-expressing stroma, which confers a competitive growth advantage on the cancer cells. Inhibition of the expression of Flower proteins reduces tumour growth and metastasis, and induces sensitivity to chemotherapy. Our results show that ancient mechanisms of cell recognition and selection are active in humans and affect oncogenic growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31341286     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1429-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  1 in total

1.  An improved and versatile immunosuppression protocol for the development of tumor xenograft in mice.

Authors:  Mehul Jivrajani; Muhammad Vaseem Shaikh; Neeta Shrivastava; Manish Nivsarkar
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.480

  1 in total
  27 in total

Review 1.  Oncological Ligand-Target Binding Systems and Developmental Approaches for Cancer Theranostics.

Authors:  Jaison Jeevanandam; Godfred Sabbih; Kei X Tan; Michael K Danquah
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Cell competition in development, homeostasis and cancer.

Authors:  Sanne M van Neerven; Louis Vermeulen
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 113.915

3.  The COX-2/PGE2 pathway suppresses apical elimination of RasV12-transformed cells from epithelia.

Authors:  Nanami Sato; Yuta Yako; Takeshi Maruyama; Susumu Ishikawa; Keisuke Kuromiya; Suzumi M Tokuoka; Yoshihiro Kita; Yasuyuki Fujita
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-03-18

Review 4.  Emerging mechanisms of cell competition.

Authors:  Nicholas E Baker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Picking Winners and Losers: Cell Competition in Tissue Development and Homeostasis.

Authors:  Wonho Kim; Rajan Jain
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 6.  Outcompeting cancer.

Authors:  Medhavi Vishwakarma; Eugenia Piddini
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Spatial competition shapes the dynamic mutational landscape of normal esophageal epithelium.

Authors:  Maria P Alcolea; Gabriel Piedrafita; Bartomeu Colom; Michael W J Hall; Agnieszka Wabik; Stefan C Dentro; Joanna C Fowler; Albert Herms; Charlotte King; Swee Hoe Ong; Roshan K Sood; Moritz Gerstung; Inigo Martincorena; Benjamin A Hall; Philip H Jones
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Cell-scale biophysical determinants of cell competition in epithelia.

Authors:  Daniel Gradeci; Anna Bove; Giulia Vallardi; Alan R Lowe; Shiladitya Banerjee; Guillaume Charras
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Active elimination of intestinal cells drives oncogenic growth in organoids.

Authors:  Ana Krotenberg Garcia; Arianna Fumagalli; Huy Quang Le; Rene Jackstadt; Tamsin Rosemary Margaret Lannagan; Owen James Sansom; Jacco van Rheenen; Saskia Jacoba Elisabeth Suijkerbuijk
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 10.  Cell competition in intratumoral and tumor microenvironment interactions.

Authors:  Taylor M Parker; Kartik Gupta; António M Palma; Michail Yekelchyk; Paul B Fisher; Steven R Grossman; Kyoung Jae Won; Esha Madan; Eduardo Moreno; Rajan Gogna
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 14.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.