Literature DB >> 31341028

Two Spatially Distinct Posterior Alpha Sources Fulfill Different Functional Roles in Attention.

Rodika Sokoliuk1, Stephen D Mayhew2, Kevin M Aquino3,4, Ross Wilson2, Matthew J Brookes3, Susan T Francis3, Simon Hanslmayr2, Karen J Mullinger2,3.   

Abstract

Directing attention helps to extract relevant information and suppress distracters. Alpha brain oscillations (8-12 Hz) are crucial for this process, with power decreases facilitating processing of important information and power increases inhibiting brain regions processing irrelevant information. Evidence for this phenomenon arises from visual attention studies (Worden et al., 2000); however, the effect also exists in other modalities, including the somatosensory system (Haegens et al., 2011) and intersensory attention tasks (Foxe and Snyder, 2011). We investigated in human participants (10 females, 10 males) the role of alpha oscillations in focused (0/100%) versus divided (40/60%) attention, both across modalities (visual/somatosensory; Experiment 1) and within the same modality (visual domain: across hemifields; Experiment 2) while recording EEG over 128 scalp electrodes. In Experiment 1, participants divided their attention between visual and somatosensory modality to determine the temporal/spatial frequency of a target stimulus (vibrotactile stimulus/Gabor grating). In Experiment 2, participants divided attention between two visual hemifields to identify the orientation of a Gabor grating. In both experiments, prestimulus alpha power in visual areas decreased linearly with increasing attention to visual stimuli. In contrast, prestimulus alpha power in parietal areas was lower when attention was divided between modalities/hemifields compared with focused attention. These results suggest there are two alpha sources, one of which reflects the "visual spotlight of attention" and the other reflects attentional effort. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that attention recruits two spatially distinct alpha sources in occipital and parietal brain regions, acting simultaneously but serving different functions in attention.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Attention to one spatial location/sensory modality leads to power changes of alpha oscillations (∼10 Hz) with decreased power over regions processing relevant information and power increases to actively inhibit areas processing "to-be-ignored" information. Here, we used detailed source modeling to investigate EEG data recorded during separate unimodal (visual) and multimodal (visual and somatosensory) attention tasks. Participants either focused their attention on one modality/spatial location or directed it to both. We show for the first time two distinct alpha sources are active simultaneously but play different roles. A sensory (visual) alpha source was linearly modulated by attention representing the "visual spotlight of attention." By contrast, a parietal alpha source was modulated by attentional effort, showing lowest alpha power when attention was divided.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; alpha oscillations; attention; brain oscillations; multimodal attention; source estimates

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31341028      PMCID: PMC6733553          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1993-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Top-down processing mediated by interareal synchronization.

Authors:  A von Stein; C Chiang; P König
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by retinotopically specific alpha-band electroencephalography increases over occipital cortex.

Authors:  M S Worden; J J Foxe; N Wang; G V Simpson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

Authors:  N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Spatial-temporal structures of human alpha rhythms: theory, microcurrent sources, multiscale measurements, and global binding of local networks.

Authors:  P L Nunez; B M Wingeier; R B Silberstein
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Simultaneous EEG and fMRI of the alpha rhythm.

Authors:  Robin I Goldman; John M Stern; Jerome Engel; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Increases in alpha oscillatory power reflect an active retinotopic mechanism for distracter suppression during sustained visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Simon P Kelly; Edmund C Lalor; Richard B Reilly; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Alpha-band electroencephalographic activity over occipital cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection.

Authors:  Gregor Thut; Annika Nietzel; Stephan A Brandt; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Where the BOLD signal goes when alpha EEG leaves.

Authors:  H Laufs; John L Holt; Robert Elfont; Michael Krams; Joseph S Paul; K Krakow; A Kleinschmidt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Klimesch; Paul Sauseng; Simon Hanslmayr
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2006-08-01
View more
  11 in total

1.  Distinct Regional Oscillatory Connectivity Patterns During Auditory Target and Novelty Processing.

Authors:  Fahimeh Mamashli; Samantha Huang; Sheraz Khan; Matti S Hämäläinen; Seppo P Ahlfors; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Coupling of pupil- and neuronal population dynamics reveals diverse influences of arousal on cortical processing.

Authors:  Thomas Pfeffer; Christian Keitel; Tobias H Donner; Joachim Gross; Daniel S Kluger; Anne Keitel; Alena Russmann; Gregor Thut
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Addressing challenges of high spatial resolution UHF fMRI for group analysis of higher-order cognitive tasks: An inter-sensory task directing attention between visual and somatosensory domains.

Authors:  Kevin M Aquino; Rodika Sokoliuk; Daisie O Pakenham; Rosa Maria Sanchez-Panchuelo; Simon Hanslmayr; Stephen D Mayhew; Karen J Mullinger; Susan T Francis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Event-related potentials reflect prediction errors and pop-out during comprehension of degraded speech.

Authors:  Leah Banellis; Rodika Sokoliuk; Conor J Wild; Howard Bowman; Damian Cruse
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2020-10-25

Review 5.  Spontaneous Fluctuations in Oscillatory Brain State Cause Differences in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Effects Within and Between Individuals.

Authors:  Shanice E W Janssens; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Visual working memory recruits two functionally distinct alpha rhythms in posterior cortex.

Authors:  Julio Rodriguez-Larios; Alma ElShafei; Melanie Wiehe; Saskia Haegens
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-09-27

7.  The SSVEP tracks attention, not consciousness, during perceptual filling-in.

Authors:  Jeroen Ja van Boxtel; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Matthew J Davidson; Will Mithen; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Strategic and Non-Strategic Semantic Expectations Hierarchically Modulate Neural Processing.

Authors:  Consuelo Vidal-Gran; Rodika Sokoliuk; Howard Bowman; Damian Cruse
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-10-19

9.  Calibrating rhythmic stimulation parameters to individual electroencephalography markers: The consistency of individual alpha frequency in practical lab settings.

Authors:  Shanice E W Janssens; Alexander T Sack; Sanne Ten Oever; Tom A de Graaf
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 3.698

10.  Delineating between-subject heterogeneity in alpha networks with Spatio-Spectral Eigenmodes.

Authors:  Andrew J Quinn; Gary G R Green; Mark Hymers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.