Paulina Cybulska1, Arnaud Da Cruz Paula1, Jill Tseng1, Mario M Leitao1, Ali Bashashati2, David G Huntsman3, Tayyebeh M Nazeran4, Carol Aghajanian5, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum1, Deborah F DeLair6, Sohrab P Shah7, Britta Weigelt8. 1. Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 3. Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Computational Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 8. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: weigeltb@mskc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (EOCs) comprise 5-10% of all ovarian cancers and commonly co-occur with synchronous endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). We sought to examine the molecular characteristics of pure EOCs in patients without concomitant EEC. METHODS: EOCs and matched normal samples were subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting 341-468 cancer-related genes (n = 8) or whole-genome sequencing (n = 28). Mutational frequencies of EOCs were compared to those of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs; n = 224) and EECs (n = 186) from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and synchronous EOCs (n = 23). RESULTS: EOCs were heterogeneous, frequently harboring KRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, CTNNB1, ARID1A and TP53 mutations. EOCs were distinct from HGSOCs at the mutational level, less frequently harboring TP53 but more frequently displaying KRAS, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN and CTNNB1 mutations. Compared to synchronous EOCs and pure EECs, pure EOCs less frequently harbored PTEN, PIK3R1 and ARID1A mutations. Akin to EECs, EOCs could be stratified into the four molecular subtypes: 3% POLE (ultramutated), 19% MSI (hypermutated), 17% copy-number high (serous-like) and 61% copy-number low (endometrioid). In addition to microsatellite instability, a subset of EOCs harbored potentially targetable mutations, including AKT1 and ERBB2 hotspot mutations. EOCs of MSI (hypermutated) subtype uniformly displayed a good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: EOCs are heterogeneous at the genomic level and harbor targetable genetic alterations. Despite the similarities in the repertoire of somatic mutations between pure EOCs, synchronous EOCs and EECs, the frequencies of mutations affecting known driver genes differ. Further studies are required to define the impact of the molecular subtypes on the outcome and treatment of EOC patients.
OBJECTIVE:Endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (EOCs) comprise 5-10% of all ovarian cancers and commonly co-occur with synchronous endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). We sought to examine the molecular characteristics of pure EOCs in patients without concomitant EEC. METHODS: EOCs and matched normal samples were subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting 341-468 cancer-related genes (n = 8) or whole-genome sequencing (n = 28). Mutational frequencies of EOCs were compared to those of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOCs; n = 224) and EECs (n = 186) from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and synchronous EOCs (n = 23). RESULTS: EOCs were heterogeneous, frequently harboring KRAS, PIK3CA, PTEN, CTNNB1, ARID1A and TP53 mutations. EOCs were distinct from HGSOCs at the mutational level, less frequently harboring TP53 but more frequently displaying KRAS, PIK3CA, PIK3R1, PTEN and CTNNB1 mutations. Compared to synchronous EOCs and pure EECs, pure EOCs less frequently harbored PTEN, PIK3R1 and ARID1A mutations. Akin to EECs, EOCs could be stratified into the four molecular subtypes: 3% POLE (ultramutated), 19% MSI (hypermutated), 17% copy-number high (serous-like) and 61% copy-number low (endometrioid). In addition to microsatellite instability, a subset of EOCs harbored potentially targetable mutations, including AKT1 and ERBB2 hotspot mutations. EOCs of MSI (hypermutated) subtype uniformly displayed a good outcome. CONCLUSIONS: EOCs are heterogeneous at the genomic level and harbor targetable genetic alterations. Despite the similarities in the repertoire of somatic mutations between pure EOCs, synchronous EOCs and EECs, the frequencies of mutations affecting known driver genes differ. Further studies are required to define the impact of the molecular subtypes on the outcome and treatment of EOC patients.
Authors: Cynthia X Ma; Ron Bose; Feng Gao; Rachel A Freedman; Melinda L Telli; Gretchen Kimmick; Eric Winer; Michael Naughton; Matthew P Goetz; Christy Russell; Debu Tripathy; Melody Cobleigh; Andres Forero; Timothy J Pluard; Carey Anders; Polly Ann Niravath; Shana Thomas; Jill Anderson; Caroline Bumb; Kimberly C Banks; Richard B Lanman; Richard Bryce; Alshad S Lalani; John Pfeifer; Daniel F Hayes; Mark Pegram; Kimberly Blackwell; Philippe L Bedard; Hussam Al-Kateb; Matthew J C Ellis Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Charlotte K Y Ng; Luciano G Martelotto; Arnaud Gauthier; Huei-Chi Wen; Salvatore Piscuoglio; Raymond S Lim; Catherine F Cowell; Paul M Wilkerson; Patty Wai; Daniel N Rodrigues; Laurent Arnould; Felipe C Geyer; Silvio E Bromberg; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Frederique Penault-Llorca; Sylvia Giard; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Rachael Natrajan; Larry Norton; Paul H Cottu; Britta Weigelt; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Jorge S Reis-Filho Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 13.583
Authors: Siân Jones; Nicolas Stransky; Christine L McCord; Ethan Cerami; James Lagowski; Devon Kelly; Samuel V Angiuoli; Mark Sausen; Lisa Kann; Manish Shukla; Rosemary Makar; Laura D Wood; Luis A Diaz; Christoph Lengauer; Victor E Velculescu Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ahmet Zehir; Ryma Benayed; Ronak H Shah; Aijazuddin Syed; Sumit Middha; Hyunjae R Kim; Preethi Srinivasan; Jianjiong Gao; Debyani Chakravarty; Sean M Devlin; Matthew D Hellmann; David A Barron; Alison M Schram; Meera Hameed; Snjezana Dogan; Dara S Ross; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Deborah F DeLair; JinJuan Yao; Diana L Mandelker; Donavan T Cheng; Raghu Chandramohan; Abhinita S Mohanty; Ryan N Ptashkin; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Meera Prasad; Mustafa H Syed; Anoop Balakrishnan Rema; Zhen Y Liu; Khedoudja Nafa; Laetitia Borsu; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Ruben Bacares; Iwona J Kiecka; Anna Razumova; Julie B Son; Lisa Stewart; Tessara Baldi; Kerry A Mullaney; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Efsevia Vakiani; Adam A Abeshouse; Alexander V Penson; Philip Jonsson; Niedzica Camacho; Matthew T Chang; Helen H Won; Benjamin E Gross; Ritika Kundra; Zachary J Heins; Hsiao-Wei Chen; Sarah Phillips; Hongxin Zhang; Jiaojiao Wang; Angelica Ochoa; Jonathan Wills; Michael Eubank; Stacy B Thomas; Stuart M Gardos; Dalicia N Reales; Jesse Galle; Robert Durany; Roy Cambria; Wassim Abida; Andrea Cercek; Darren R Feldman; Mrinal M Gounder; A Ari Hakimi; James J Harding; Gopa Iyer; Yelena Y Janjigian; Emmet J Jordan; Ciara M Kelly; Maeve A Lowery; Luc G T Morris; Antonio M Omuro; Nitya Raj; Pedram Razavi; Alexander N Shoushtari; Neerav Shukla; Tara E Soumerai; Anna M Varghese; Rona Yaeger; Jonathan Coleman; Bernard Bochner; Gregory J Riely; Leonard B Saltz; Howard I Scher; Paul J Sabbatini; Mark E Robson; David S Klimstra; Barry S Taylor; Jose Baselga; Nikolaus Schultz; David M Hyman; Maria E Arcila; David B Solit; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger Journal: Nat Med Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Jamie K Teer; Sean Yoder; Anxhela Gjyshi; Santo V Nicosia; Chaomei Zhang; Alvaro N A Monteiro Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Charlie Gourley; C Simon Herrington; Robert L Hollis; Barbara Stanley; John P Thomson; Michael Churchman; Ian Croy; Tzyvia Rye; Clare Bartos; Fiona Nussey; Melanie Mackean; Alison M Meynert; Colin A Semple Journal: NPJ Precis Oncol Date: 2021-06-02
Authors: Paulina Cybulska; Jill Tseng; Qin C Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Deborah F Delair; Jennifer J Mueller; Kara C Long Roche; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Mario M Leitao Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 2.885
Authors: Jaime I Davila; Pritha Chanana; Vivekananda Sarangi; Zachary C Fogarty; S John Weroha; Ruifeng Guo; Ellen L Goode; Yajue Huang; Chen Wang Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.063