Literature DB >> 3133992

Coagulation screen is more specific than the anticardiolipin antibody ELISA in defining a thrombotic subset of lupus patients.

R H Derksen1, P Hasselaar, L Blokzijl, F H Gmelig Meyling, P G De Groot.   

Abstract

In 111 lupus patients we compared the potential of the IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibody (ACA) enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and four different lupus anticoagulant (LAC) assays (partial thromboplastin time (PTT) of a 1:1 mixture of patient and control plasma with phospholipids from animal (PTT-st) or human brain (PTT-HB); PTT with dilutions of human brain phospholipids (PL dilution); and kaolin clotting time of mixtures of patient and control plasma (KCT] to identify patients with thrombosis (26/111), fetal loss (19/46), and/or thrombocytopenia (11/106). The highest specificity for thrombosis (87%) was found with PTT-HB and PL dilution (sensitivity 65%, detection rate 61%); for fetal loss (93%) with PL dilution (sensitivity 47%; detection rate 82%), and for thrombocytopenia (83%) with KCT (sensitivity 82%; detection rate 36%). Compared with LAC assays, the sensitivity of ACA-ELISA was high (greater than or equal to 77%), but specificity (less than or equal to 51%) and detection rate (less than or equal to 52%) were low. So, a panel of three LAC assays (PTT-HB, PL dilution, and KCT) can identify lupus patients apparently at risk for thrombosis, fetal loss, and/or thrombocytopenia, whereas the ACA-ELISA is insufficiently specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3133992      PMCID: PMC1003528          DOI: 10.1136/ard.47.5.364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  36 in total

1.  Purification and kinetic studies on a circulating anticoagulant in a suspected case of lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  E T Yin; L W Gaston
Journal:  Thromb Diath Haemorrh       Date:  1965-09-01

2.  A chlorpromazine-induced inhibitor of blood coagulation.

Authors:  R T Canoso; R A Hutton; D Deykin
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  A new type of coagulation inhibitor.

Authors:  K Lechner
Journal:  Thromb Diath Haemorrh       Date:  1969-06-15

Review 4.  Lupus anticoagulants.

Authors:  S S Shapiro; P Thiagarajan
Journal:  Prog Hemost Thromb       Date:  1982

5.  Laboratory diagnosis of lupus inhibitors: a comparison of the tissue thromboplastin inhibition procedure with a new platelet neutralization procedure.

Authors:  D A Triplett; J T Brandt; D Kaczor; J Schaeffer
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  E M Tan; A S Cohen; J F Fries; A T Masi; D J McShane; N F Rothfield; J G Schaller; N Talal; R J Winchester
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1982-11

7.  The lupus anticoagulant.

Authors:  M Boxer; L Ellman; A Carvalho
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1976 Nov-Dec

8.  Thrombosis in patients with the lupus anticoagulant.

Authors:  J R Mueh; K D Herbst; S I Rapaport
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  The varied sensitivity of partial thromboplastin and prothrombin time reagents in the demonstration of the lupus-like anticoagulant.

Authors:  P M Mannucci; M T Canciani; D Mari; P Meucci
Journal:  Scand J Haematol       Date:  1979-05

10.  A sensitive test demonstrating lupus anticoagulant and its behavioural patterns.

Authors:  T Exner; K A Rickard; H Kronenberg
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Antiphospholipid syndrome: multiple mechanisms.

Authors:  C G Mackworth-Young
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Isotype distribution of anticardiolipin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective analysis of a series of 100 patients.

Authors:  R Cervera; J Font; A López-Soto; F Casals; L Pallarés; A Bové; M Ingelmo; A Urbano-Márquez
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Lupus anticoagulant: clinical significance in anticardiolipin positive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  N J McHugh; D A Moye; I E James; M Sampson; P J Maddison
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Antiphospholipid antibodies and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection.

Authors:  N Snowden; P B Wilson; M Longson; R S Pumphrey
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Methods for detecting lupus anticoagulants and their relation to thrombosis and miscarriage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  D Ferro; M Saliola; C Quintarelli; G Valesini; S Basili; A M Grandilli; M S Bonavita; F Violi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Prospective study of fluctuations of lupus anticoagulant activity and anticardiolipin antibody titre in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  H J Out; M van Vliet; P G de Groot; R H Derksen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  The antiphospholipid antibody dilemma.

Authors:  R H Derksen; P Hasselaar; J D Oosting; P G De Groot
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Fluctuations of anticardiolipin antibody levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a prospective study.

Authors:  H J Out; P G de Groot; P Hasselaar; M dan Vliet; R H Derksen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Anticardiolipin versus lupus anticoagulant tests: no final judgment.

Authors:  E N Harris
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Risk factors for thrombosis in lupus patients.

Authors:  P Hasselaar; R H Derksen; L Blokzijl; M Hessing; H K Nieuwenhuis; B N Bouma; P G De Groot
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.