| Literature DB >> 31338787 |
Aleksandar Baucal1, Alex Gillespie2, Ksenija Krstić3, Tania Zittoun4.
Abstract
Debates about replication in psychology have focused on methodological issues and how to strengthen the replication culture. In most cases, these discussions have tended to assume that the phenomena being investigated are universal. In this paper, we are going to propose a theoretical distinction of different types of replication. The distinction is based on the assumption that besides of universal psychological phenomena there are also phenomena, especially in social and cultural psychology, that are expected to vary between socio-cultural contexts and across history. Taking this insight to its logical conclusion it implies that the main purpose of a replication and interpretation of its results depends on the phenomenon being studied. In the case of the universal phenomena, the replication serves to validation purpose, while in the case of the socio-cultural phenomenon it serves to advance our theoretical understanding of how the given phenomenon is formatted by the socio-cultural-historical context.Keywords: Replication in psychology; Reproducibility in psychology; Socio-cultural-historical psychology
Year: 2020 PMID: 31338787 DOI: 10.1007/s12124-019-09499-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Psychol Behav Sci ISSN: 1932-4502