Eun Kyoung Choi1, Hye Lim Park2, Ie Ryung Yoo3, Seung Joon Kim4, Young Kyoon Kim4. 1. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222, Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul, South Korea. iryoo@catholic.ac.kr. 4. Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We reviewed PET/CT findings of pneumoconiosis and determined the ability of PET/CT to differentiate lung cancer from progressive massive fibrosis (PMF), and metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) from underlying reactive LN hyperplasia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with pneumoconiosis and suspected lung cancer. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), long- and short-axis diameters (DL and DS), ratio of DL to DS (DL/S), and Hounsfield unit (HU) from the lung mass and mediastinal LNs were measured. The cutoff values of each parameter were obtained by ROC analysis, and we evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity. RESULTS: Forty-nine pneumoconiosis patients were included. Eighty-three lung masses were detected, of which 42 were confirmed as lung cancer (23 squamous cell carcinomas, 12 adenocarcinomas, and 7 small cell carcinomas) and 41 were PMF. There were significant differences between lung cancer and PMF in terms of SUVmax, DS, DL/S, and HU (all p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of lung cancer were 81.0%, 73.2%, and 77.1%, respectively, with an SUVmax cutoff value of 7.4; and 92.8%, 87.8%, and 90.4%, respectively, with a HU cutoff value of 45.5. Among the 40 LNs with available pathological results, 7 were metastatic. Metastatic LNs showed higher SUVmax, larger DS, and lower HU than benign lesions (all p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting metastatic LNs by PET/CT were 85.7%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: By applying PET and CT parameters in combination, the accuracy for differentiating malignant from benign lesions could be increased. PET/CT can play a central role in the discrimination of lung cancer and PMF. KEY POINTS: • Lung cancer showed significantly higher SUVmax than PMF. • Lung cancer showed similar D L but longer D S , resulting in a smaller D L/S than PMF. • SUVmax demonstrated additive value in differentiating lung cancer from PMF, compared with HU alone.
OBJECTIVES: We reviewed PET/CT findings of pneumoconiosis and determined the ability of PET/CT to differentiate lung cancer from progressive massive fibrosis (PMF), and metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) from underlying reactive LN hyperplasia. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with pneumoconiosis and suspected lung cancer. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), long- and short-axis diameters (DL and DS), ratio of DL to DS (DL/S), and Hounsfield unit (HU) from the lung mass and mediastinal LNs were measured. The cutoff values of each parameter were obtained by ROC analysis, and we evaluated the diagnostic sensitivity. RESULTS: Forty-nine pneumoconiosispatients were included. Eighty-three lung masses were detected, of which 42 were confirmed as lung cancer (23 squamous cell carcinomas, 12 adenocarcinomas, and 7 small cell carcinomas) and 41 were PMF. There were significant differences between lung cancer and PMF in terms of SUVmax, DS, DL/S, and HU (all p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for diagnosis of lung cancer were 81.0%, 73.2%, and 77.1%, respectively, with an SUVmax cutoff value of 7.4; and 92.8%, 87.8%, and 90.4%, respectively, with a HU cutoff value of 45.5. Among the 40 LNs with available pathological results, 7 were metastatic. Metastatic LNs showed higher SUVmax, larger DS, and lower HU than benign lesions (all p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for predicting metastatic LNs by PET/CT were 85.7%, 93.9%, and 92.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: By applying PET and CT parameters in combination, the accuracy for differentiating malignant from benign lesions could be increased. PET/CT can play a central role in the discrimination of lung cancer and PMF. KEY POINTS: • Lung cancer showed significantly higher SUVmax than PMF. • Lung cancer showed similar D L but longer D S , resulting in a smaller D L/S than PMF. • SUVmax demonstrated additive value in differentiating lung cancer from PMF, compared with HU alone.
Authors: Christos Sachpekidis; Christian Thieke; Vasileios Askoxylakis; Nils H Nicolay; Peter E Huber; Michael Thomas; Georgia Dimitrakopoulou; Juergen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-01-15
Authors: Soo Yoon Chung; Jae Hoon Lee; Tae Hoon Kim; Sang Jin Kim; Hyung Joong Kim; Young Hoon Ryu Journal: Ann Nucl Med Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 2.668