Arianna Di Stadio1, Laura Dipietro2, Massimo Ralli3, Mario Faralli4, Antonio Della Volpe5, Giampietro Ricci6, Daniela Messineo7. 1. Otolaryngology Department, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. ariannadistadio@hotmail.com. 2. Highland Instruments, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Department of Sense Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. 4. Vestibular Center Otolaryngology Department, Silvestrini Hospital, Perugia, Italy. 5. Otology and Cochlear Implant Unit, Santobono-Pausilipon Hospital, Naples, Italy. 6. Otolaryngology Department, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. 7. Radiology, Oncology, and Anatomopathological Department, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
AIM: We investigated if loop characteristics correlate with audio-vestibular symptoms or hemifacial spasm in patients with a vascular loop in the root entry zone (VII and VIII) and in the internal auditory canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 2622 consecutive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the cerebellopontine angle of patients with asymmetric audio-vestibular symptom or hemifacial spasm; patients' symptoms were confirmed by clinical tests. MRIs displaying vascular loops visible in the axial view were analyzed using multiplanar reconstruction. We evaluated (1) depth of penetration of the loop into the internal auditory canal (IAC); (2) largest diameter of the vessel; (3) nerve(s) involved in the vascular impingement, position of the loop relative to such nerve(s) and number of contacts between vessel and nerve(s); (4) length of such contact. The loop metrics described above were correlated with the patients' audio-vestibular symptoms and hemifacial spasm. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine patients displayed a loop visible in the MRI axial view and out of them only 118 displayed a direct contact between loop and nerve. The cochlear nerve was involved in a contact in 57.7%. Loops in direct nerve contact had a calibre > 0.85 mm, were located in the middle portion of the IAC, and correlated with vertigo (p = 0.002), tinnitus (p = 0.003), and hemifacial spasm (p < 0.001). Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) correlated with number of contacts (p < 0.001) and length of contact (p < 0.05). The contact was asymptomatic in 41.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Loop characteristics may help predict whether a vascular impingement is responsible for a symptom and guide the physician to select the best treatment. KEY POINTS: • A vascular loop in the internal auditory canal was observed in 18-20% of the patients in this study; whether a loop can be responsible for a compressive syndrome is still unclear in particular referred to the vestibulocochlear nerve. • Compression by a loop on the facial nerve causes hemifacial spasm; compression by a loop on the cochlear or vestibular nerve may cause audio-vestibular symptoms. • In patients with a loop, the loop calibre, the loop position, and the number of loop-nerve(s) assessed via the multiplanar MRI reconstruction technique may help assess whether the patient will manifest audio-vestibular symptoms or hemifacial spasm.
AIM: We investigated if loop characteristics correlate with audio-vestibular symptoms or hemifacial spasm in patients with a vascular loop in the root entry zone (VII and VIII) and in the internal auditory canal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter study analyzed 2622 consecutive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the cerebellopontine angle of patients with asymmetric audio-vestibular symptom or hemifacial spasm; patients' symptoms were confirmed by clinical tests. MRIs displaying vascular loops visible in the axial view were analyzed using multiplanar reconstruction. We evaluated (1) depth of penetration of the loop into the internal auditory canal (IAC); (2) largest diameter of the vessel; (3) nerve(s) involved in the vascular impingement, position of the loop relative to such nerve(s) and number of contacts between vessel and nerve(s); (4) length of such contact. The loop metrics described above were correlated with the patients' audio-vestibular symptoms and hemifacial spasm. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-nine patients displayed a loop visible in the MRI axial view and out of them only 118 displayed a direct contact between loop and nerve. The cochlear nerve was involved in a contact in 57.7%. Loops in direct nerve contact had a calibre > 0.85 mm, were located in the middle portion of the IAC, and correlated with vertigo (p = 0.002), tinnitus (p = 0.003), and hemifacial spasm (p < 0.001). Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) correlated with number of contacts (p < 0.001) and length of contact (p < 0.05). The contact was asymptomatic in 41.5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Loop characteristics may help predict whether a vascular impingement is responsible for a symptom and guide the physician to select the best treatment. KEY POINTS: • A vascular loop in the internal auditory canal was observed in 18-20% of the patients in this study; whether a loop can be responsible for a compressive syndrome is still unclear in particular referred to the vestibulocochlear nerve. • Compression by a loop on the facial nerve causes hemifacial spasm; compression by a loop on the cochlear or vestibular nerve may cause audio-vestibular symptoms. • In patients with a loop, the loop calibre, the loop position, and the number of loop-nerve(s) assessed via the multiplanar MRI reconstruction technique may help assess whether the patient will manifest audio-vestibular symptoms or hemifacial spasm.
Entities:
Keywords:
Diagnosis; Hearing loss; Magnetic resonance imaging; Vascular malformation; Vertigo