| Literature DB >> 31338044 |
Kathrin Nickel1, Ludger Tebartz van Elst1, Lukas Holovics2, Bernd Feige1, Volkmar Glauche3, Tina Fortenbacher2, Dominique Endres1, Almut Zeeck2, Oliver Tüscher4, Andreas Joos2,5, Simon Maier1,2.
Abstract
Objective: Severe malnutrition in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) as well as possible trait-related aberrations lead to pronounced structural brain changes whose reversibility after recovery is currently unclear. Previous diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies investigating white matter (WM) microstructure alterations in AN are inconsistent.Entities:
Keywords: anorexia nervosa; corpus callosum; diffusion tensor imaging; fractional anisotropy; mean diffusivity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31338044 PMCID: PMC6628864 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Previous diffusion tensor imaging studies in anorexia nervosa.
| Study | n (AN/REC/HC) | Age in years | Methods | Region(s) and results (AN/REC vs HC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 56 AN | 15.86 ± 2.93 | TBSS | FA↓: body corpus callosum in AN vs HC |
|
| 21 REC (for 1year) | 27.62 ± 5.06 | FSL | No differences in WM microstructure (FA, AD, MD and RD) between REC and HC |
|
| 8 AN | 17.6 ± 2.2 | SPM | FA↓: left superior frontal gyrus, medial frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, thalamus, bilateral insula |
|
| 14 AN | 15.7 ± 1.6 | FSL | FA↓: left anterior and superior corona radiata, left superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), fornix, body corpus callosum |
|
| 24 REC | 21.3 ± 4.5 | DTI Studio | AN showed abnormal network modularity involving frontal, basal ganglia, and posterior cingulate nodes |
|
| 22 AN | 15.0 ± 1.6 | FSL | FA↑: bilateral superior region of corona radiata, corpus callosum, anterior and posterior thalamic radiation, anterior and posterior limb of internal capsule, left inferior longitudinal fasciculus |
|
| 35 AN | 16.1 ± 2.8 | FSL, TRACULA | No group differences in FA, MD, RD, AD after correction for multiple comparisons. |
|
| 22 AN | 19.5± 2.4 | FSL, TBSS | FA↑: fronto-accumbal WM ROI near the lateral orbitofrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens both before and after weight restoration |
|
| 24 REC | 30.3 ± 8.1 | FSL, TBSS | REC FA↓: anterior corona radiata, capsula interna, cerebellum (corticopontine tract, inferior, and middle peduncle), corpus callosum, anterior thalamic radiation, inferior fronto-occipital, uncinate fasciculus MD, RD, AD: no differences |
|
| 8 AN | 35.0 ± 11.0 | FSL, 3D Slicer | FA↓: bilateral anterior limb of capsula interna, right anterior cingulum, left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, left crus fornix |
|
| 15 AN | 16.6 ± 1.4 | mrDiffusion | FA↓: right anterior superior longitudinal fasciculus, bilateral fibria-fornix, corpus callosum |
|
| 19 AN | 28.37 ± 9.55; | FSL, | FA↓: parietal part of the left SLF and the fornix |
|
| 17 AN | 23.8 ± 6.68 | FSL, | FA↓: left cerebellar hemisphere |
|
| 19 AN | 15.4 ± 1.4 | SPM, NordicICE | FA↓: left fornix, bilateral cingulum, right forceps major, right superior, and left posterior corona radiate, occipital part corpus callosum |
|
| 12 REC | 28.7 ± 7.9 | FSL | FA: No group differences |
|
| 12 AN | 26.8 ± 6.9 | SPM | FA↓ (AN and REC): bilateral posterior thalamic radiation (optic radiation, left mediodorsal thalamus), bilateral posterior corona radiate, left middle cerebellar peduncle, parts of left SLF |
|
| 16 AN | 24 ± 7 | SPM, DTI Studio | FA↓: bilateral fimbria-fornix, fronto-occipital fasciculus, posterior cingulum WM |
AN, anorexia nervosa; REC, recovered; HC, healthy controls; SD, standard deviation; WM, white matter; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; AD, axial diffusivity; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; TBSS, tract-based spatial statistics; SPM, statistical parametric mapping; TRACULA, TRActs Constrained by UnderLying Anatomy; SLF, superior longitudinal fasciculus; ROI, region of interest.
Demographic and psychometric data.
| AN | REC | HC ( | ANOVA | Post-hoc Tukey-Kramer test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 24.3 ± 4.2 | 27.2 ± 7.4 | 23.0 ± 2.5 | df = 2,83; F = 5.2; p = 0.007 | REC>AN, HC |
|
| 16.3 ± 1.4 | 20.7 ± 1.3 | 21.9 ± 2.3 | df = 2,83; F = 88.8; p < 0.001 | HC>REC>AN |
|
| 6.7 ± 3.8 | 5.5 ± 5.1 | Not applicable | ||
|
| 14.8 ± 1.4 | 14.6 ± 2.2 | 20.3 ± 1.7 | df = 2,62; F = 58.3; p < 0.001 | HC>REC, AN |
|
| Not applicable | 4.5 | Not applicable | ||
|
| 3.2 ± 1.1 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.3 | df = 2,83; F = 142.8; p < 0.001 | AN>REC, HC |
|
| 61.1 ± 8.9 | 47.3 ± 5.1 | 44.2 ± 3.0 | df = 2,83; F = 65.7; p < 0.001 | AN>REC, HC |
|
| 20.9 ± 10.6 | 6.0 ± 6.1 | 2.2 ± 2.9 | df = 2,83; F = 56.4; p < 0.001 | AN>REC, HC |
|
| 39.0 ± 7.0 | 35.2 ± 5.5 | 32.4 ± 4.7 | df = 2,83; F = 10.5; p < 0.001 | AN, REC>HC |
|
| 46.7 ± 7.5 | 31.4 ± 7.8 | 29.1 ± 6.8 | df = 2,83; F = 53.8; p < 0.001 | AN>REC, HC |
|
| 28.5 ± 5.0 | 29.5 ± 5.0 | 27.7 ± 4.1 | df = 2,83; F = 0.9; p = 0.4 | |
|
| 42.9 ± 10.0 | 49.3 ± 17.4 | 42.2 ± 12.4 | df = 2, 81; F = 2.1; p = 0.1 | |
|
| 110.8 ± 114.4 | 290.5 ± 141.0 | 380.3±113.8 | df = 2,83; F = 42.1; p < 0.001 | HC>REC>AN |
AN, anorexia nervosa; REC, recovered; HC, healthy controls; SD, standard deviation; y, years; min, minutes; ANOVA, analysis of variance; BMI, body mass index; EDE, Eating Disorder Examination Interview; EDI, Eating Disorder Inventory; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; STAI, State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory; MWT-B, Multiple-Choice Word Test B; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 1Fractional anisotropy. (A) Glass brain view of the difference in FA signal depicted in purple between AN and HC individuals in left and top view. Individuals with AN show significantly lower FA values in the body of the corpus callosum (x = −14, y = −15, z = 33; Z = 4.14) as compared to HC. (B) Network involvement of the region with abnormal FA signal. We tracked the connectivity of the ROI in the body of the corpus callosum (x = −14, y = −15, z = 33) which showed a significantly lower FA in AN to illustrate the network involvement. Red: left – right; green: anterior – posterior; blue: superior – inferior. FA, fractional anisotropy; AN, anorexia nervosa; HC, healthy controls; ROI, region of interest.
Figure 2Mean diffusivity (MD). (A) Glass brain view of the difference in MD signal depicted in purple between AN and HC individuals in right and top view. Individuals with AN show significantly lower MD values in the posterior thalamic radiation (x = 36, y = −50, z = 8; Z = 4.77) as compared to HC. (B) Network involvement of the region with abnormal MD signal. We tracked the connectivity of the ROI in the posterior thalamic radiation (x = 36, y = −50, z = 8) which showed a significantly lower MD in AN to illustrate the network involvement. Red: left – right; green: anterior – posterior; blue: superior – inferior. MD, mean diffusivity; AN, anorexia nervosa; HC, healthy controls; ROI, region of interest.