| Literature DB >> 31337961 |
Xie Dan1, Zhang Mushi1, Wang Baili2, Lin Han1, Wu Enqi1, Zhao Huanhu1, Li Shuchun1.
Abstract
Hypertension is the main risk factor for cerebral stroke and death resulting from cerebral stroke. Current association studies on hypertension and intestinal microbiota focus on patients with hypertension (HTN); however, no investigations involving patients with isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) or systolic hypertension (SH) have been conducted to date. In this study, fecal samples from 62 cases with normal blood pressure (BP) and 67 cases with high BP were used for 16S amplicon sequencing. Sixty-one cases of HTN and 61 corresponding cases with normal BP were obtained by propensity score matching (PSM), and differential analysis was conducted using the DEseq2 package. PSM was also used to match six IDH patients with six controls and to match 35 cases of SH with 35 controls. There were 54 differential genera between the HTN and normal BP groups, and there were five differential genera between the IDH and normal BP groups. There were 38 differential genera between the SH and normal BP groups, including Christensenella. Bayesian network analysis showed that variations in BP influenced microbial abundance. Pearson's correlation analysis showed that bacterial abundance is correlated with BP. Significant differences between the intestinal microbiota of high and normal BP groups were observed. Gut microbiota dysbiosis differed among HTN, IDH, and SH patients. In particular, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were related to different intestinal microbiota.Entities:
Keywords: Hypertension; diastolic pressure; differential species; intestinal microbiota; systolic pressure
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31337961 PMCID: PMC6643114 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.29322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Characteristics of subjects
| Hypertension | Normal blood pressure | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | 62 | 67 | |
| Gender (% Female) | 62 (53.23%) | 67 (61.19%) | 0.360 |
| Age, year | 69.322 ± 10.613 | 69.492 ± 9.630 | 0.509 |
| SBP, mmHg | 122.935 ± 6.902 | 153.298 ± 14.917 | 0.000* |
| DBP, mmHg | 76.209 ± 6.902 | 84.313 ± 10.739 | 0.000* |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26.089 ± 3.112 | 25.051 ± 4.436 | 0.169 |
| WHR | 0.864 ± 0.065 | 0.853 ± 0.130 | 0.645 |
| GLU, mmol/L | 6.729 ± 1.956 | 6.030 ± 1.176 | 0.059 |
| CHO, mmol/L | 5.249 ± 1.022 | 5.093 ± 1.062 | 0.443 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.403 ± 50.827 | 1.441 ± 0.346 | 0.496 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 1.986 ± 1.250 | 3.182 ± 0.865 | 0.322 |
| TG, mmol/L | 1.986 ± 1.250 | 1.812 ± 1.206 | 0.336 |
| BUN, mmol/L | 5.373 ± 1.285 | 5.739 ± 1.418 | 0.181 |
| UA, μmol/L | 344.709 ± 89.964 | 346.224 ± 76.830 | 0.386 |
| HCY, μmol/L | 13.940 ± 6.080 | 13.150 ± 3.620 | 0.607 |
The data on age, SBP, DBP, BMI, WHR, GLU, CHO, HDL, LDL, TG, BUN, UA, and HCY are expressed as the mean ± SD. P-values for gender, age, SBP, DBP, BMI, WHR, GLU, CHO, HDL, LDL, TG, BUN, UA, and HCY were calculated using Student's t-test. *P < 0.05. SBP: systolic blood pressure, DBP: diastolic blood pressure, BMI: body mass index, WHR: waist-to-hip ratio; GLU: glucosuria; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low density lipoprotein; TG: total triglyceride, CHO: total cholesterol; BUN blood urea nitrogen; UA: uric acid; HCY: homocysteine. *P < 0.05.
Figure 1The alpha diversity index box plot and beta diversity PCoA plot of HTN and normal blood pressure (BP normal) groups; significance was determined by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. a. Ace index, box plot generated by R (version 3.5.0). b. Chao1 index, box plot generated by R (version 3.5.0). c. Shannon index, box plot generated by R (version 3.5.0). d. Simpson index, box plot generated by R (version 3.5.0). e. PCoA plot according to the Jaccard distance matrix generated from the table of differential OTUs, plotted by the ggplot2 package of the language R. Groups were compared using Adonis.
Figure 2Differential microbiota between HTN group and normal blood pressure (BP) group. a. The differential OTUs between the HTN group and the normal BP group were analyzed using the DEseq2 package of the language R, and OTUs in accordance with corrected P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 2 or fold change < 0.5 were identified. There were 54 OTUs with higher abundances in the HTN group, and 44 OTUs with higher abundances in the normal BP group. A volcano plot was generated by Vegan package. b. The differential OTUs between the HTN and normal BP groups were clustered into 54 genera. Bayesian networks between the SH and normal BP groups, and between the IDH and normal BP groups. a. Analysis of differential microbiota between the HTN and normal BP groups using the DEseq2 package of the language R. The dendrogram was plotted using Figtree (version 1.4.3).
Figure 3Differential microbiotas between the IDH group and normal blood pressure (BP) group and their associations. a. The differential OTUs between the IDH and normal BP groups were analyzed using the DEseq2 package of the language R, and OTUs in accordance with corrected P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 2 or fold change < 0.5 were identified. There were four OTUs with higher abundances in the IDH group, and three OTUs with high abundances in the normal BP group. A volcano plot was generated by Vegan package. b. The differential OTUs between the IDH group and normal BP group were clustered into five genera. c. The associations between microbiotas were deduced by a Bayesian network, and the network diagram was generated using Cytoscape (version 3.6.1). The relative size of the circles indicates relative abundance. c. Differences in the microbiota between the IDH group and normal BP group were analyzed using the DEseq2 package of the language R. The associations between microbiotas were deduced by a Bayesian network, and the network diagram was generated by Cytoscape (version 3.6.1).
Figure 4Differential microbiotas between the SH group and normal blood pressure (BP) group and their associations. a. The differential OTUs between the SH and normal BP groups were analyzed using the DEseq2 package of the language R, and OTUs in accordance with corrected P value < 0.05 and fold-change > 2 or fold-change < 0.5 were screened. There were 23 OTUs with high abundances in the SH group, and 32 OTUs with high abundances in the normal BP group. A volcano plot was generated by Vegan package. b. The differential OTUs between the SH and normal BP groups were clustered into 38 genera. c. The associations between microbiotas were deduced by a Bayesian network, and the network diagram was generated by Cytoscape (version 3.6.1). The relative size of each circle represents the relative abundance.
Figure 5Pearson's correlation coefficients between differential microbiotas and blood pressure (BP). a. Differential microbiota was significantly correlated with DBP. Christensenella and Olsenella were negatively correlated with the systolic pressure. The X-axis represents diastolic pressure, and the Y-axis represents the abundance of bacteria. Data were plotted using the language. b. differential microbiota was significantly correlated with SBP. The X-axis represents the diastolic pressure, and the Y-axis represents the abundance of bacteria. Data were plotted using the language R. Macellibacteroides was significantly negatively correlated with diastolic pressure, whereas Butyricimonas, Clostridium XlVa, and Paraprevotella were significantly positively correlated with diastolic pressure.