Literature DB >> 31337667

Sex disparities in the management of coronary heart disease in general practices in Australia.

Crystal Man Ying Lee1,2, George Mnatzaganian3, Mark Woodward4,5, Clara K Chow6,7, Freddy Sitas8,9, Suzanne Robinson10, Rachel R Huxley4,11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sex differences exist in the management of patients with a history of coronary heart disease (CHD) in primary care.
METHODS: General practice records of patients aged ≥18 years with a history of CHD in a large general practice dataset in Australia, MedicineInsight, were analysed. Sex-specific, age-standardised proportions of patients prescribed with recommended medications; assessed for cardiovascular risk factors; and achieved treatment targets according to the General Practice Management Plan were reported.
RESULTS: Records of 130 926 patients (47% women) from 438 sites were available from 2014 to 2018. Women were less likely to be prescribed with recommended medications (prescribed ≥3 medications: women 44%, men 61%; p<0.001). Younger patients, especially women aged <45 years, were substantially underprescribed (aged <45 years prescribed ≥3 medications: women 2%, men 8%; p<0.001). Lower proportions of women were assessed for cardiovascular risk factors (blood test for lipids: women 70%-76%, men 77%-81%; p<0.001). Body size was not commonly assessed (body mass index: women 59%, men 62%; p<0.001; waist: women 23%, men 25%; p<0.001). Higher proportions of women than men achieved targets for most risk factors (achieved ≥4 targets in patients assessed for all risk factors: women 82%, men 76%).
CONCLUSION: Gaps in preventative management including prescription of indicated medications and risk factor monitoring have been reported from the late 1990s and this large-scale general practice data analysis indicate they still persist. Moreover, the gap is larger in women compared to men. We need new ways to address these gaps and the sex inequity. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery disease; primary care

Year:  2019        PMID: 31337667     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  8 in total

1.  Sex differences in atrial fibrillation: patient-reported outcomes and the persistent toll on women.

Authors:  Raisa L Silva; Emily N Guhl; Andrew D Althouse; Brandon Herbert; Michael Sharbaugh; Utibe R Essien; Leslie R M Hausmann; Jared W Magnani
Journal:  Am J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2021-09-03

2.  Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Medication Prescription in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Min Zhao; Mark Woodward; Ilonca Vaartjes; Elizabeth R C Millett; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Karice Hyun; Cheryl Carcel; Sanne A E Peters
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Study on the Correlation between Continuity of Care and Quality of Life for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Hsiang-Chu Pai; Yi-Fang Hu; Shu-Yuan Chao; Hsiao-Mei Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Investigating inequities in cardiovascular care and outcomes for Queensland Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: protocol for a hospital-based retrospective cohort data linkage project.

Authors:  Therese Kearns; Abbey Diaz; Lisa J Whop; Suzanne P Moore; John R Condon; Ross M Andrews; Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Veronica Matthews; William Wang; Trisha Johnston; Catherine Taylor; Boyd Potts; Alex Kathage; Abdulla Suleman; Lucy Stanley; Louise Mitchell; Gail Garvey; Daniel Williamson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Comparison of cardiovascular disease risk factors, assessment and management in men and women, including consideration of absolute risk: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Jennifer Welsh; Grace Joshy; Melonie Martin; Ellie Paige; Rosemary J Korda
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Trends in long-term opioid prescriptions for musculoskeletal conditions in Australian general practice: a national longitudinal study using MedicineInsight, 2012-2018.

Authors:  Sean Black-Tiong; David Gonzalez-Chica; Nigel Stocks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Associations between regular GP contact, diabetes monitoring and glucose control: an observational study using general practice data.

Authors:  David Youens; Suzanne Robinson; Jenny Doust; Mark N Harris; Rachael Moorin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Trends in percentages of gestational diabetes mellitus attributable to overweight, obesity, and morbid obesity in regional Victoria: an eight-year population-based panel study.

Authors:  George Mnatzaganian; Mark Woodward; H David McIntyre; Liangkun Ma; Nicola Yuen; Fan He; Helen Nightingale; Tingting Xu; Rachel R Huxley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.