| Literature DB >> 31334263 |
Neda Dastyar1, Ameneh Safarzadeh Sarasyabi2, Mansour Shakiba3, Ali Navidian4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sexual assertiveness plays a crucial role in the quality of sex, as well as in investigating and treating sexual problems. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of assertiveness-based sexual training on the quality of marital relationships of married female students.Entities:
Keywords: Assertiveness; quality of marital relationship; sexual counseling
Year: 2019 PMID: 31334263 PMCID: PMC6615125 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_440_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Structure and concept of sexual group counseling based on sexual assertiveness
| Session | Content |
|---|---|
| 1st | Meeting and greeting, primary communication, and introduction to the principles and goals of the meeting, anatomy of the internal and external genitals, physiology of genitals, sexual performance, and sexual response cycle |
| 2nd | Distinguishing daring from nondaring behaviors (aggressive and neutral), skill of saying no, assertiveness in social relations, necessity of self-express and its benefits in life, having or lacking the right to self-express, and right to freedom of choice |
| 3rd | Marital satisfaction and its influential factors, role of sexual assertiveness in marital satisfaction, lack of sexual assertiveness and unwanted pregnancy, lack of sexual assertiveness and sexual misbehaviors of sex partner, wrong beliefs about sexual roles and expectations, and dual sexual norms |
| 4th | Review of previous session teachings, sexual assertiveness and sexual performance, expressing the benefits of sexual assertiveness and factors affecting this issue, methods to increase sexual assertiveness, question and answer, and conclusion |
Demographic characteristics of the intervention and control groups
| Variable | Intervention, | Control, | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Husband’s job | |||
| Student | 12 (30) | 8 (20) | 0.58* |
| Self-employed | 18 (45) | 21 (52.5) | |
| Others | 10 (25) | 11 (27.5) | |
| Total | 49 (100) | 40 (100) | |
| Husband’s education | |||
| Diploma and lower | 12 (30) | 13 (32.5) | 0.9* |
| Associate diploma | 6 (15) | 8 (20) | |
| Bachelor | 15 (37.5) | 13 (32.5) | |
| Higher than bachelor | 7 (17.5) | 6 (15) | |
| Total | 40 (100) | 40 (100) | |
| Female’s education | |||
| Bachelor | 33 (82.5) | 34 (85) | 0.99* |
| Higher than bachelor | 7 (17.5) | 6 (15) | |
| Total | 40 (100) | 40 (100) | |
| Couple’s relative relationship | |||
| Yes | 27 (67.5) | 28 (70) | 0.99* |
| No | 13 (32.5) | 12 (30) | |
| Total | 40 (100) | 40 (100) | |
| Type of marriage | |||
| Modern (selective) | 30 (75) | 35 (87.5) | 0.99* |
| Traditional (forced) | 10 (25) | 5 (12.5) | |
| Total | 40 (100) | 40 (100) | |
| Age of female, mean±SD | 22.30±2.81 | 22.47±3.10 | 0.79** |
| Age of husband, mean±SD | 26.58±3.37 | 26.67±3.69 | 0.89** |
| Marriage duration (year), mean±SD | 3.00±2.21 | 3.55±2.23 | 0.61** |
*Chi-squared test, **Independent t-test. SD=Standard deviation
Quality of marital relationships scores in the intervention and control groups before and after the sexual counseling based on assertiveness
| Group | Time, mean±SD | Paired | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Changes | ||
| Intervention | 89.21±20.96 | 103.07±16.09 | 7.05±12.40 | |
| Control | 115.17±16.95 | 104.62±10.85 | −10.55±12.41 | |
| Independent | 0.0001 | 0.61 | 0.0001 | |
SD=Standard deviation
The results of covariance analysis on the score of quality of marital relationships in women after sexual counseling by adjusting the pretest effect
| Source of change | SS | df | MS | Significant | η | Power | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | 8886.92 | 1 | 8886.92 | 117.59 | 0.0001 | 0.6 | 1 |
| Group | 1268.48 | 1 | 1268.48 | 16.78 | 0.0001 | 0.17 | 0.98 |
| Error | 5819.22 | 77 | 75.57 | ||||
| Total | 877,540 | 80 |
SS=Sum of square, MS=Mean of square