Literature DB >> 3133420

The effect of surgical drain together with a secondary closure technique on postoperative trismus, swelling and pain after mandibular third molar surgery.

E C de Brabander1, G Cattaneo.   

Abstract

This investigation compared the results of 2 types of wound closure after mandibular third molar removal. In both the test group and the control group, the molars were removed using a mucoperiosteal flap as described by Szmyd; a wedge of tissue distal to the second molar was removed before closure to secure self-irrigation of the empty socket. The test group received a gauze drain partially submerged into the socket to secure more drainage and to prevent primary wound healing. Examinations were performed 2 days and 7 days after surgery, and pain, swelling, trismus and wound condition were recorded. Analyses of variance indicated that there was no significant difference between the 2 types of wound closure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3133420     DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(88)80164-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  19 in total

1.  Summary of the scientific literature for pain and anxiety control in dentistry.

Authors:  L C Hassett
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1989 May-Jun

Review 2.  Management of inflammatory complications in third molar surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  O D Osunde; R A Adebola; U K Omeje
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Comparison of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Anisha Maria; Murtuza Malik; Parag Virang
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-09-23

4.  Comparative study of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Pavan Kumar Pachipulusu; Manjula S
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 5.  Impacted wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Thomas B Dodson; Srinivas M Susarla
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-04-08

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Immediate Post-Operative Sequelae after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar with or without Tube Drain - Split-Mouth Study.

Authors:  Barun Kumar; Kalyani Bhate; R S Dolas; Sn Santhosh Kumar; Pushkar Waknis
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Kiran Khande; Harish Saluja; Uma Mahindra
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-04-22

8.  Comparison of corticosteroids and rubber drain for reduction of sequelae after third molar surgery.

Authors:  Mohammad Zandi
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05

9.  Effect of drain application on postoperative complaints after surgical removal of impacted wisdom teeth-a randomized observer-blinded split-mouth clinical trial.

Authors:  Marie Sophie Katz; Florian Peters; Dirk Elvers; Philipp Winterhalder; Kristian Kniha; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Alveolar iodine tampon packing after impacted third molar surgery improves oral health-related quality of life and postoperative sequela: a randomized study.

Authors:  Jerome A Lindeboom; Jacco G Tuk; Patrick Möllenkamp; Arjen J van Wijk
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.