| Literature DB >> 31334064 |
Treville Pereira1, J Aswathy1, Subraj Shetty1, Avinash Tamgadge1, Sandhya Tamgadge1, Swati Gotmare1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is characterized histologically by epithelial basal cell destruction and a dense subepithelial lymphocytic infiltrate. Mast cells (MCs) play a role in the pathogenesis and progression of the disease causing changes in the basement membrane (BM). BM is seen as continuous or fragmented, distinct or indistinct, and afibrillar or fibrillar extensions. AIMS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Azure A; basement membrane; fluorescent microscope; fluorescent periodic acid–acriflavine; mast cells; oral lichen planus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31334064 PMCID: PMC6615385 DOI: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_147_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian Dermatol Online J ISSN: 2229-5178
Figure 1(a) Photomicrograph of oral lichen planus stained with Azure A showing numerous mast cells (×40). (b) Photomicrograph of oral lichen planus stained with fluorescent microscopy acriflavine stain showing reduced thickness of basement membrane (×40)
Comparison of status of basement membrane (continuous vs. fragmented) among the groups using Chi-square test
| Group | Continuity | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fragmented | Continuous | ||
| Control group | |||
| Count | 0 | 30 | 30 |
| Percentage within group | 0.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Study group | |||
| Count | 30 | 6 | 36 |
| Percentage within group | 83.3 | 16.7 | 100.0 |
| Total | |||
| Count | 30 | 36 | 66 |
| Percentage within group | 45.5 | 54.5 | 100.0 |
| 45.833, <0.001** | |||
**P<0.001 – highly significant
Figure 2Graph 1 – comparison of continuity among both the groups using Chi-square test
Comparison of contrast of basement membrane among the groups using Chi-square test
| Group | Contrast | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indistinct | Distinct | ||
| Control group | |||
| Count | 6 | 24 | 30 |
| Percentage within group | 20.0 | 80.0 | 100.0 |
| Study group | |||
| Count | 26 | 10 | 36 |
| Percentage within group | 72.2 | 27.8 | 100.0 |
| Total | |||
| Count | 32 | 34 | 66 |
| Percentage within group | 48.5 | 51.5 | 100.0 |
| 17.867, <0.001** | |||
**P<0.001 – highly significant
Figure 3Graph 2 – comparison of contrast among both the groups using Chi-square test
Comparison of pattern of staining of basement membrane (fibrillar vs. afibrillar) among the groups using Chi-square test
| Group | Pattern | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Afibrillar | Fibrillar | ||
| Control group | |||
| Count | 28 | 2 | 30 |
| Percentage within group | 93.3 | 6.7 | 100.0 |
| Study group | |||
| Count | 7 | 29 | 36 |
| Percentage within group | 19.4 | 80.6 | 100.0 |
| Total | |||
| Count | 35 | 31 | 66 |
| Percentage within group | 53.0 | 47.0 | 100.0 |
| 17.867, <0.001** | |||
**P<0.001 – highly significant
Figure 4Graph 3 – comparison of pattern among both the groups using Chi-square test
Correlation of total mast cells with continuity, contrast, and pattern of basement membrane using Pearson’s correlation coefficient
| Basement membrane | Total mast cells | |
|---|---|---|
| Continuity | 0.182 | 0.288 |
| Contrast | 0.067 | 0.699 |
| Pattern | −0.580 | <0.001** |
**P<0.001 – highly significant