Literature DB >> 31333252

Confirmation Bias as a Factor in Pharmacy Student Assessment of Research Study Quality.

Donald R Miller1, Stefanie J Jangula2.   

Abstract

Objective. To determine whether pharmacy students' prior beliefs and attitudes about drug products and dietary supplements affected their ability to analyze the quality of research study abstracts and use them in making drug recommendations to patients. Methods. Fifty-nine Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students in a drug literature course were randomly assigned to receive one of two forms to evaluate four drug literature abstracts of varying quality and study design. On each form, there were two abstracts that had been taken directly from published research studies and two abstracts in which a different product had been substituted for the actual product studied. Pharmacy students completed a questionnaire about the studies to determine whether their evaluation of quality was affected by their prior opinions about the products. Results. Students correctly recognized the relative quality of the studies. However, after reading abstracts of research articles that were identical except for the product named, students were still more likely to recommend drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration than dietary supplements. Conclusion. Pharmacy students' evaluation of clinical research studies was mildly influenced by confirmation bias but more so by the quality of the research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  confirmation bias; drug literature evaluation; research quality; study design

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31333252      PMCID: PMC6630873          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  11 in total

1.  Confirmation bias: why psychiatrists stick to wrong preliminary diagnoses.

Authors:  R Mendel; E Traut-Mattausch; E Jonas; S Leucht; J M Kane; K Maino; W Kissling; J Hamann
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 2.  Intrathecal methotrexate overdose.

Authors:  A C Lee; K W Wong; K W Fong; K T So
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.299

3.  A randomized trial about the perceived informativeness of new empirical evidence. Does beta-carotene prevent (cervical) cancer?

Authors:  H C de Vet; A G Kessels; P Leffers; P G Knipschild
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  A randomized study of how physicians interpret research funding disclosures.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Christopher T Robertson; Jessica A Myers; Susannah L Rose; Victoria Gillet; Kathryn M Ross; Robert J Glynn; Steven Joffe; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in treatment of acute influenza: a randomised controlled trial. Neuraminidase Inhibitor Flu Treatment Investigator Group.

Authors:  K G Nicholson; F Y Aoki; A D Osterhaus; S Trottier; O Carewicz; C H Mercier; A Rode; N Kinnersley; P Ward
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Petasites hybridus root (butterbur) is an effective preventive treatment for migraine.

Authors:  R B Lipton; H Göbel; K M Einhäupl; K Wilks; A Mauskop
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-12-28       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Randomized study of the efficacy and safety of oral elderberry extract in the treatment of influenza A and B virus infections.

Authors:  Z Zakay-Rones; E Thom; T Wollan; J Wadstein
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  A double-blind randomized controlled trial of low doses of propranolol, nortriptyline, and the combination of propranolol and nortriptyline for the preventive treatment of migraine.

Authors:  Renan B Domingues; André L Pirajá da Silva; Simone A Domingues; Camila Catherine H Aquino; Gustavo W Kuster
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.420

9.  Dispensing error leading to alendronate ingestion.

Authors:  Benoit Carrière; Benoit Bailey; Gilles Chabot; Denis Lebel
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Confirmation bias in studies of nestmate recognition: a cautionary note for research into the behaviour of animals.

Authors:  Ellen van Wilgenburg; Mark A Elgar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.