Literature DB >> 31333052

Nest-building performance in rats: impact of vendor, experience, and sex.

Kerstin Schwabe1, Lena Boldt2, André Bleich3, Roelof Maarten van Dijk2, Simeon Oscar Arnulfo Helgers1, Christine Häger3, Marta Nowakowska2, Ann-Kristin Riedesel1, Katharina Schönhoff2, Birgitta Struve3, Jürgen Wittek1, Heidrun Potschka2.   

Abstract

Nest building behavior has been intensely applied as a parameter for severity assessment in mice. In contrast, only a limited number of studies have reported nest building data from rats. Here, we assessed nest building in rats in two different facilities addressing the hypotheses that the vendor, previous experience with the nesting material as well as sex of the rats has an impact on the performance. Data from two study sites and three raters were compared to obtain information about the robustness of nest complexity scoring. The findings demonstrate a generally poor nest building performance in rats with a pronounced day-to-day fluctuation, and site-specific differences. Application of a newly developed scoring system resulted in an intermediate inter-rater reliability. Previous experience with the nesting material did not exert a consistent impact on nest complexity scores. Sex differences proved to depend on vendor and animal facility without consistent findings supporting a superior performance in female or male rats. In conclusion, our findings argue against a robust and consistent influence of sex and familiarity with the nesting material. The comparison between facilities suggests that local conditions need to be considered as influencing factors, which should be explored in more detail by future multicenter approaches. Considering the day-to-day fluctuation and the intermediate inter-rater reliability, we highly recommend to base nest complexity evaluation on means from several subsequent days analyzed by a group of experienced raters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enviro-dri®; Nest complexity; behavior; rats; severity assessment

Year:  2019        PMID: 31333052     DOI: 10.1177/0023677219862004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim        ISSN: 0023-6772            Impact factor:   2.471


  4 in total

1.  Phenotyping Young GluA1 Deficient Mice - A Behavioral Characterization in a Genetic Loss-of-Function Model.

Authors:  Maria Reiber; Helen Stirling; Rolf Sprengel; Peter Gass; Rupert Palme; Heidrun Potschka
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Development of behavioral patterns in young C57BL/6J mice: a home cage-based study.

Authors:  Maria Reiber; Ines Koska; Claudia Pace; Katharina Schönhoff; Lara von Schumann; Rupert Palme; Heidrun Potschka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The impact of tethered recording techniques on activity and sleep patterns in rats.

Authors:  Katharina Aulehner; Jack Bray; Ines Koska; Claudia Pace; Rupert Palme; Matthias Kreuzer; Bettina Platt; Thomas Fenzl; Heidrun Potschka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Dopamine Transporter Knockout Rats Show Impaired Wellbeing in a Multimodal Severity Assessment Approach.

Authors:  Anne Stephanie Mallien; Laura Becker; Natascha Pfeiffer; Federica Terraneo; Melissa Hahn; Anthonieke Middelman; Rupert Palme; Kerstin Camile Creutzberg; Veronica Begni; Marco Andrea Riva; Damiana Leo; Heidrun Potschka; Fabio Fumagalli; Judith R Homberg; Peter Gass
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.617

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.