Literature DB >> 31332298

Exogenous testosterone increases sensitivity to moral norms in moral dilemma judgements.

Skylar M Brannon1, Sarah Carr1, Ellie Shuo Jin1, Robert A Josephs1, Bertram Gawronski2.   

Abstract

Moral dilemma judgements frequently involve decisions where moral norms and the greater good are in conflict. The current preregistered study tested the effect of the steroid hormone testosterone on moral dilemma judgements using a double-blind administration of testosterone or placebo. Counter to predictions, testosterone administration led to increased inaction in moral dilemmas where harmful actions prohibited by moral norms increase overall well-being. Using a mathematical model to disentangle sensitivity to consequences, sensitivity to moral norms and general preference for inaction versus action, analyses further revealed that testosterone administration influenced judgements by increasing sensitivity to moral norms. Exploratory analyses suggested the opposite pattern for endogenous testosterone measured at baseline, in that higher levels of endogenous testosterone were associated with lower sensitivity to moral norms. The results indicate that the role of testosterone in moral judgements is more complex than suggested by previous findings. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 13 November 2017. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at https://osf.io/rysbe/ 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31332298     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0641-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  4 in total

1.  Breakdown of utilitarian moral judgement after basolateral amygdala damage.

Authors:  Jack van Honk; David Terburg; Estrella R Montoya; Jordan Grafman; Dan J Stein; Barak Morgan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 12.779

2.  Low competitive status elicits aggression in healthy young men: behavioural and neural evidence.

Authors:  Macià Buades-Rotger; Martin Göttlich; Ronja Weiblen; Pauline Petereit; Thomas Scheidt; Brian G Keevil; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Moral judgment and hormones: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Carolina Coelho Moniz de Campos Freitas; Flávia de Lima Osório
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  More utilitarian judgment in Internet addiction? An exploration using process dissociation and the CNI model.

Authors:  Jianxia Lu; Junjie Xie; Jin Chen; Yan Zeng; Zhongli Jiang; Yunqiang Wang; Hui Zheng
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.708

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.