Literature DB >> 31332128

Optic disc pit maculopathy and its spectrum of management.

Rebika Dhiman1, Srikant K Padhy1, Toshit Varshney1, S J Vikas1, Prashant Kumar1, Atul Kumar1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31332128      PMCID: PMC6677038          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1937_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Optic disc pit maculopathy (ODPM) encompasses serous macular detachment and retinoschisis.[1] There are no discrete recommendations as to the best management option. Here, we describe three cases of ODPM managed differently in various situations. Our first case was a 15-year-old girl was diagnosed with ODPM with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of counting finger at 1 m in left eye [Fig. 1a-c]. A 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), brilliant blue dye (BBG) assisted ILM peeling and tucking of the free ILM flap into the ODP was done [Fig. 1d].
Figure 1

Case 1 (a) SSOCT left eye showing retinoschisis involving multiple retinal layers; and (b) neurosensory detachment extensing up to the temporal edge of the pit; (c) Colour fundus photograph of left eye showing optic disc pit and associated serous retinal detachment; (d) PPV with ILM peeling and flap being tucked in the pit

Case 1 (a) SSOCT left eye showing retinoschisis involving multiple retinal layers; and (b) neurosensory detachment extensing up to the temporal edge of the pit; (c) Colour fundus photograph of left eye showing optic disc pit and associated serous retinal detachment; (d) PPV with ILM peeling and flap being tucked in the pit The second case was a 34-year-old woman with BCVA of 20/200 in the affected right eye [Fig. 2a]. SSOCT exhibited associated foveal thinning [Fig. 2b]. So, fovea-sparing ILM flap was fashioned such that 2/3rd disc diameter of ILM was left attached over the fovea [Fig. 2c].
Figure 2

Case 2 (a) SSOCT image of the right eye showing retinoschisis with neurosensory detachment at the macula and severe foveal thinning; (b) Color fundus photograph of left eye showing optic disc pit and associated macular retinal detachment; (c) Modified technique of foveal-sparing ILM peel being done to avoid the risk of macular hole; ILM flap created was tucked in the pit

Case 2 (a) SSOCT image of the right eye showing retinoschisis with neurosensory detachment at the macula and severe foveal thinning; (b) Color fundus photograph of left eye showing optic disc pit and associated macular retinal detachment; (c) Modified technique of foveal-sparing ILM peel being done to avoid the risk of macular hole; ILM flap created was tucked in the pit Our third case was 21-year-old women with previously failed surgery (PPV with conventional ILM flap) for ODMP right eye [Fig. 3b]. ILM flap was not visible on SSOCT over the ODP [Fig. 3a]. Autologous ILM transplantation and gas tamponade was performed using the ILM harvested from the nasal retinal [Fig. 3c].
Figure 3

Case 3 (a) SSOCT image of the right eye showing retinoschisis with persistent neurosensory detachment at the macula; (b) Color fundus photograph of right eye showing optic disc pit maculopathy that failed to resolve after first surgery; (c) ILM transplantation being done over the pit using the ILM harvested from the nasal retina

Case 3 (a) SSOCT image of the right eye showing retinoschisis with persistent neurosensory detachment at the macula; (b) Color fundus photograph of right eye showing optic disc pit maculopathy that failed to resolve after first surgery; (c) ILM transplantation being done over the pit using the ILM harvested from the nasal retina All cases reported complete resolution of fluid with a BCVA >20/80 in all cases during the mean follow-up of 9 months.

Discussion

Pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade are considered to be the most effective steps in ODPM surgery.[23] ILM peeling eliminates traction,[45] ensures complete hyaloid removal, and the flap over the pit intercepts the fluid from vitreous cavity (Case 1). But there is risk of macular hole formation[4] in cases where the retina is extremely thinned out. A foveal-sparing ILM peel can be considered in such cases (Case 2). In refractory cases (Case 3), if no resolution is noted even after ≥12 months autologous ILM transplantation has been reported to be an effective treatment option.[24]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  5 in total

1.  Crater-like holes in the optic disc and central serous retinopathy.

Authors:  E W KRANENBURG
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1960-12

2.  Multicenter study of pars plana vitrectomy for optic disc pit maculopathy: MACPIT study.

Authors:  R Avci; Z Kapran; Ş Ozdek; M Y Teke; O Oz; D Guven; S Yilmaz; B Kaderli; A H Durukan; G Sobaci; Y B Unver; L Akduman; S Kaynak; I Dogan; U U Inan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  27-Gauge Via Pars Plana Vitrectomy With Autologous ILM Transplantation for Optic Pit Disc Maculopathy.

Authors:  Tomaso Caporossi; Lucia Finocchio; Francesco Barca; Fabrizio Franco; Ruggero Tartaro; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 1.300

4.  Vitrectomy for optic disk pit with macular schisis and outer retinal dehiscence.

Authors:  Dhananjay Shukla; Jay Kalliath; Manish Tandon; Balakrishnan Vijayakumar
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Minimal gauge vitrectomy for optic disc pit maculopathy: Our results.

Authors:  Atul Kumar; Varun Gogia; Ritu Nagpal; Sangeeta Roy; Shikha Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.848

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  A rare association of optic disc pit maculopathy and ectopia lentis.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur Narde; Divya Agarwal; Deeksha Rani; Ragini Sonkar; Atul Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.848

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.