Literature DB >> 31331217

Identification of genetic variations in Necator americanus through resequencing by whole genome amplification.

Yumei Liu1,2, Hongxuan Liu1,2, Yuefeng Xie1,2, Baohuan Zhang1,2, Xiaoqian Zou1,2, Meiling Ou1,2, Xiaohong Ye1,2, Yajing Han1,2, Jing Wu1,2, Xiaojing Chen1,2, Shirui Dong1, Kehui Zhu1,2, Congcong Guo2, Penghua Wang3, Hening Zhai4, Chunxia Jing2,5,6, Guang Yang1,5,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Necator americanus; gene ontology; multiple displacement amplification; parasite; resequencing; single nucleotide polymorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31331217      PMCID: PMC6753555          DOI: 10.1177/0300060519862069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Med Res        ISSN: 0300-0605            Impact factor:   1.671


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Parasitic infection is a major global threat to human health.[1,2] Humans can be infected with around 300 species of helminths and more than 70 species of protozoa,[3] and parasites also cause enormous economic losses.[4] Soil-transmitted helminths are a major type of parasitic infection with public health importance.[5] In 2015, the global burden of infections involving soil-transmitted helminths was estimated at 3.4 million disability-adjusted life years.[6] Exploring the genetic information of these parasites is important for understanding the pathogenesis of parasitic diseases. However, the tiny amounts of DNA isolated are usually inadequate for genetic analysis. Therefore, a whole genome amplification (WGA) strategy may help resolve this problem. Many WGA methods are currently available, including multiple displacement amplification (MDA) which has been widely used in next-generation sequencing.[7] MDA involves the annealing of random primers to denatured DNA, and strand displacement synthesis at a constant temperature using the φ29 enzyme, which has high processivity, strong strand displacement, and exonuclease activity.[8] MDA is an ideal method for WGA because of its high DNA yield, high fidelity, and low amplification bias.[9] The genome of the helminth Necator americanus (N. americanus) was first published in 2014 (Genome ID: 770).[10] In this report, Tang and colleagues characterized many important genes involved in invasion, blood feeding, and development, and identified a list of novel potential drug targets against hookworms. In the present study, we acquired a single small helminth through endoscopic biopsy. Morphologically, its appearance was consistent with N. americanus under an inverted microscope. To obtain its genetic information, we conducted whole genome resequencing (WGRS) but failed to construct DNA libraries using traditional DNA extraction methods from such a limited sample. We therefore developed a novel sequencing strategy that directly amplified the entire genome of the helminth using MDA, and aligned the sequencing data to the first version of the genome of N. americanus (Genome ID: 770). We successfully identified 125,553 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), 2,552 insertion–deletions (InDels), and 22,316 structural variations (SVs) in the sample. We believe that this novel method will provide a reference for molecular classification and epidemiological studies of other small parasites.

Materials and methods

Sampling

The helminth was collected using endoscopic biopsy forceps during an endoscopic biopsy conducted with an EC-600WM endoscope (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). It was transferred to the laboratory in a cell culture tube filled with 5 mL saline. After taking photographs under an inverted microscope, the helminth sample was transferred to the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) for WGRS. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine at Jinan University, China, and was performed strictly in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patient’s written consent was obtained before the endoscopy.

DNA library construction

Because of the small size of the roundworm, its genomic DNA was directly amplified using MDA by BGI. WGA was performed using the REPLI-g Single Cell Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). The sample was first lysed with lysis buffer from the kit, then the DNA was denatured with denaturation buffer for 10 minutes at 65°C. Denaturation was stopped by the addition of neutralization buffer, then a master mix containing buffer and DNA polymerase was added and the isothermal amplification reaction proceeded for 8 hours at 30°C. Amplified DNA was kept at –20°C for long-term storage. The library was prepared as follows: 1.5 µg DNA was fragmented by ultrasonication, then its quality was tested by gel electrophoresis. DNA was end-repaired by combining with End Repair Mix (New England Biolabs Inc. Beverly, MA, USA), and incubating at 20°C for 30 minutes. DNA was then purified with the QIA quick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen), after which A-Tailing Mix was added and incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes. DNA was purified with QIA quick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen), then combined with 60 nmol adapter and 2 µL Ligation Mix before incubating at 20°C for 15 minutes. Adapter-ligated DNA was recovered from a 2% agarose gel and purified with the QIA quick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen).

Validation of the library

The final library was quantitated by determining the average molecule length using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer instrument (Agilent DNA 1000 Reagents; Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and via real-time quantitative PCR using TaqMan probes. This was performed using the Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System Upgrade Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and Step One Plus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Whole genome resequencing and SNP calling

The library was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq X10 system at the BGI in 2 × 150 paired-end mode. For quality control, we removed reads with adaptors and reads of low quality where more than half of the base qualities were less than 5 using SOA Pnuke software.[11] The sequencing reads were aligned with the reference genome N. americanus fa using SOAP2 software.[12] The reference genome (N. americanus fa) and annotation were obtained from the Worm Base Parasite database (http://parasite.wormbase. org/Necator_ americanus _ prjna 72135 /Info/Index/; Genome ID: 770).[10] The sequencing depth and coverage compared with the reference genome were calculated based on the alignment. SNPs in the sequenced genome were detected using SOAPsnp software.[13] Based on the alignment results, and considering the analysis of data characteristics, sequencing quality, and other experimental effects, a Bayesian model was used to calculate genotype probabilities. The genotype with the highest probability was selected as the genotype of the sequenced individual at the specific locus, and a quality value was designated to denote the accuracy of the genotype. We remapped the reads using BWA software and recalled InDels by samtools and bcftools.[14] BreakDancer was used to identify SVs.[15]

De novo assembly and species distribution based on all scaffolds

To calculate the species distribution based on all scaffolds, sequences were assembled using Velvet software, which is the most commonly used genome assembly tool.[16] First, the ErrorCorrection tool was used to correct the data to remove low-frequency sequencing errors after transferring original image data into sequence data stored in FASTQ format through Base Calling software. Next, Kmer analysis was used to estimate the genome size and sequence multiples. Assembled scaffolds were then aligned onto the RefSeq non-redundant protein database, and BLAST results were analyzed via MEGAN software.[17]

Gene ontology analysis

To determine the underlying connections between SNPs and genes, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was conducted for functional annotations of these SNPs. Enrichment analysis was performed by Fisher’s exact test using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (https://david.ncifcrf.gov) by classifying them into three domains: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function.[18] The cut-off P-value was < 0.05, which was considered to be significant.

Results

Patient background and sample description

A 54-year-old woman attended the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University on July 20th, 2016, complaining of arthritis for more than 1 year that had worsened in the past 2 months. On physical examination, she showed no obvious symptoms or signs, and her vital signs were stable. Her levels of red blood cells, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and ferrum were low, whereas platelets and the blood sedimentation rate were elevated, which suggested iron deficiency (anemia). Eosinophils, the most important indicator for parasitic infection, were also elevated, but a stool examination was negative for parasite eggs. A 10-mm-long slender hyperemic round-cylindrical helminth was found via gastroduodenoscopy in the duodenal bulb (Figure 1a). To avoid further suffering to the patient, we did not obtain more helminths by further endoscopy. After being collected by the endoscopic biopsy forceps, the sample was put in a 24-well plate (Figure 1b). The helminth was relatively slender in the front section and slightly curved in the dorsal section. Under the inverted microscope, a well-developed buccal cavity was seen to contain a pair of cutting plates (Figure 1d). The end of the helminth was conical, indicating that it was a female worm (Figure 1c). Its appearance was consistent with that of N. americanus. Because it was isolated from the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, we named the strain JNU-1.
Figure 1.

Morphological characteristics of strain JNU-1. a: JNU-1 strain in the duodenal bulb. b: JNU-1 strain in the 24-well plate. c: End of the JNU-1 strain under the inverted microscope. d: Cutting plates of the JNU-1 strain under the inverted microscope.

Morphological characteristics of strain JNU-1. a: JNU-1 strain in the duodenal bulb. b: JNU-1 strain in the 24-well plate. c: End of the JNU-1 strain under the inverted microscope. d: Cutting plates of the JNU-1 strain under the inverted microscope.

Sequencing, mapping, and SNP annotation

A total of 20.38 G bases were sequenced of the raw data, and ultimately 19.3 G of clean data were obtained. Q20 and Q30 reflect the accuracy of the sequenced bases, and denote base error rates of 1% and 0.1%, respectively. Our Q20 rate of clean data was 97.41%, indicating that the data quality was very high. However, mapping of the reads to the human genome (hg19) resulted in only 0.85% (552,556/64,757,726) being aligned (reads with 80% of the bases matching the human genome are considered to be human contamination reads). The proportion of contaminations of the host genome was relatively low. According to basic morphological features, we used N. americanus fa as the reference genome for this project. The genome size of N. americanus fa is 245,853,160 bp and the effective size is 208,173,610 bp (not including N base in the reference). The mapping rate was 64.12%, and the final effective mapping depth was 59.61. Paired-end sequencing libraries with an insert size of approximately 500 bp were constructed for the sample. We plotted the distribution of the insert size based on the alignment results (Figure 2). To determine if the WGA had a sequence bias, we assessed the distribution of reads mapped to the reference genome and the distribution of coverage of 10 chromosomes (Figure 3). There were no significant differences in the mapped reads distributions on each chromosome.
Figure 2.

The distribution of insert size based on the result of alignment.

Figure 3.

The distribution of the reads mapped to reference genome. X-axis represents the window numbers. Y-axis represents the coverage or depth. Coverage represents the ratio of the area covered by reads to the length of each window. A coverage close to 1 indicates that the reads are evenly distributed. Depth means the average sequence depth in each window. Nt, nucleotide.

The distribution of insert size based on the result of alignment. The distribution of the reads mapped to reference genome. X-axis represents the window numbers. Y-axis represents the coverage or depth. Coverage represents the ratio of the area covered by reads to the length of each window. A coverage close to 1 indicates that the reads are evenly distributed. Depth means the average sequence depth in each window. Nt, nucleotide. In total, 125,553 SNPs in 42,131 genes were found in the N. americanus genome. Of these, 6289 (5.01%) were in coding regions. Among these, 3933 synonymous and 2356 nonsynonymous SNPs were annotated. Based on these annotations, we identified some SNPs that could potentially influence gene functions which we called potential effect SNPs (Table 1). Of these, 36 SNPs were predicted to induce premature stop codons, 21 were predicted to change the start codon to a non-start codon, 11 were predicted to remove the annotated stop codons resulting in longer open reading frames, and 35 were predicted to disrupt splicing donor or acceptor sites. Some of these potential SNPs might have major impacts on biological processes. For instance, some SNPs predicted to induce premature stop codons were distributed in the coding region of oxidoreductase proteins, ligand-binding proteins, and nucleotide–sugar transporters. Some SNPs were located in the coding region of endonucleases, calpain family cysteine proteases, and lectin C-type domain proteins, changing the start codon to a non-start codon. Other SNPs were related to 50S ribosomal protein, brix domain protein, and triacylglycerol lipase. We also found 35 SNPs located at splicing sites.
Table 1.

The list of potential effect SNPs.

ChromosomePositionGene IDNameAA Mutation
NW_013562409.165040742XP_013308799.1CAG<->TAG
NW_013562027.189652664XP_013306871.1TGG<->TAG
NW_013561991.1126022856XP_013306683.1TAC<->TAA
NW_013561981.1736952961XP_013306563.1CAA<->TAA
NW_013561750.1379083768XP_013305757.1CGA<->TGA
NW_013561523.18923114699XP_013304922.1CAG<->TAG
NW_013561477.11093134818XP_013304712.1TGT<->TGA
NW_013561310.17889855542XP_013304039.1GGA<->TGA
NW_013561123.1779546080XP_013303452.1CGA<->TGA
NW_013561101.11636986135XP_013303371.1TGG<->TGA
NW_013560795.110506989XP_013302549.1CGA<->TGA
NW_013560786.13547457021XP_013302505.1TGC<->TGA
NW_013560572.11390257615XP_013301923.1CAG<->TAG
NW_013560466.11266037790XP_013301701.1GGA<->TGA
NW_013559795.1272649340XP_013300184.1CAG<->TAG
NW_013559785.1427169493XP_013300046.1GAA<->TAA
NW_013559784.11465619512XP_013300037.1GAG<->TAG
NW_013559709.1509410851XP_013298669.1TCA<->TAA
NW_013559689.157565211164XP_013298405.1CGA<->TGA
NW_013559653.18727611650XP_013297892.1AAG<->TAG
NW_013559590.115489712652XP_013296866.1GAG<->TAG
NW_013559531.110383413406XP_013296146.1AAA<->TAA
NW_013559528.110454213424XP_013296113.1CGA<->TGA
NW_013558779.114954313971XP_013295537.1GAA<->TAA
NW_013558779.120537513978XP_013295544.1TAT<->TAG
NW_013554582.17115129XP_013294409.1TTA<->TAA
NW_013554317.171015190XP_013294348.1TAC<->TAG
NW_013552452.13383215654XP_013293882.1TGG<->TGA
NW_013551777.1256115830XP_013293697.1TAC<->TAA
NW_013551390.184915917XP_013293621.1CAA<->TAA
NW_013551101.12941816041XP_013293493.1CAA<->TAA
NW_013551101.13022116041XP_013293493.1TGG<->TGA
NW_013550967.122143416927XP_013292606.1GGA<->TGA
NW_013550919.13806717191XP_013292230.1TGG<->TGA
NW_013550772.1189818154XP_013291357.1TTA<->TAA
NW_013562348.1556331032XP_013308510.1ATG<->GTG
NW_013562335.1405271176XP_013308367.1ATG<->ATT
NW_013562312.1139321318XP_013308220.1ATG<->ATA
NW_013561997.153582808XP_013306729.1ATG<->ATT
NW_013561842.198733513XP_013306024.1ATG<->ATC
NW_013561689.1178004029XP_013305510.1ATG<->GTG
NW_013561551.11665144522XP_013305005.1ATG<->ATC
NW_013561437.183904927XP_013304611.1ATG<->ACG
NW_013561041.11512236338XP_013303207.1ATG<->GTG
NW_013560947.1214756590XP_013302937.1ATG<->TTG
NW_013559734.115658310308XP_013299150.1ATG<->ACG
NW_013559703.115442710929XP_013298617.1ATG<->ATA
NW_013559680.11245311243XP_013298287.1ATG<->AAG
NW_013559652.113019511663XP_013297880.1ATG<->CTG
NW_013559623.178075512105XP_013297443.1ATG<->ATC
NW_013556537.141914632XP_013294906.1ATG<->ATA
NW_013555186.1112314962XP_013294576.1ATG<->AGG
NW_013553526.13115398XP_013294140.1ATG<->ATA
NW_013550952.129057017045XP_013292512.1ATG<->ATC
NW_013550860.1439117683XP_013291813.1GTA<->GCA
NW_013550693.13671718751XP_013290789.1ATG<->ATA
NW_013562267.11895141514XP_013308023.1TAG<->TGG
NW_013561551.12877134541XP_013305024.1TAG<->TGG
NW_013561299.12251085591XP_013303951.1TGA<->CGA
NW_013560708.17467229XP_013302309.1TAA<->TAC
NW_013559914.1980719121XP_013300416.1TAA<->TTA
NW_013559511.151530413740XP_013295835.1TAG<->TAC
NW_013558462.1147114098XP_013295440.1TGA<->CGA
NW_013552930.19215558XP_013293971.1TAA<->CAA
NW_013550973.13861216888XP_013292648.1TGA<->AGA
NW_013550910.13054117368XP_013292168.1TAA<->AAA
NW_013550673.12864318850XP_013290684.1TAA<->TCA
The list of potential effect SNPs.

Gene ontology analysis based on SNPs

To better understand the genetic function of mutations in the coding regions of JNU-1, GO analysis was performed of SNP-containing genes in coding regions. In sequential order of enrichment, the top five categories with the most SNPs of all GO terms were: adenosine triphosphate (ATP) binding, zinc ion binding, collagen trimers, G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, and structural constituents of the cuticle (Figure 4), which are major molecular drug targets. Other SNPs were also associated with intracellular signal transduction, transporter activity, aspartic-type endopeptidase activity, and microtubule-based movement.
Figure 4.

Gene ontology (GO) analysis on SNP-containing genes in coding regions. GO terms were divided into three parts: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function.

Gene ontology (GO) analysis on SNP-containing genes in coding regions. GO terms were divided into three parts: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. GO terms were divided into three parts: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. The number of SNPs in each part is shown in Figure 4. Approximately 78% of SNP-containing genes were associated with molecular function. The greatest number of SNPs was associated with intracellular signal transduction, collagen trimers, and ATP binding.

Assembly result

We attempted de novo assembly of the JNU-1 genome to identify scaffolds with potential function, but lacked sufficient reads for this. Functional analysis based on scaffolds assembled a total of 290,018 sequences of JNU-1 containing 386,897,339 bp, with an N rate of 0.01519%. The GC content was 39.89%. The maximum length of the sequence was 30,923 bp, and the median was 940 bp with an average length of 1334 bp. Regarding length, 50% of the genome was contained within sequences with a minimum length of 1758 bp, and 90% of the genome was in sequences with a minimum length of 636 bp.

InDels and SVs

We remapped the reads to identify InDels and SVs. We found 2552 InDels, including 726 frameshift deletions, 1011 frameshift insertions, 409 nonframeshift deletions, and 405 nonframeshift insertions. We also found 22,316 SVs, including 8393 inter-chromosomal translocations, 11,711 inversions, and 2212 intra-chromosomal translocations.

Discussion

Because of the limited size of small parasites, constructing libraries by extracting DNA using traditional methods often leads to failure. In the present study, we acquired a helminth sample but construction of the DNA library for WGRS was unsuccessful. Therefore, we developed a novel amplification technique to probe the genome of this strain. The MDA method was previously shown to be feasible for accurately amplifying a nematode parasite genome in an unbiased manner for the genomic characterization of filarial parasites.[19] The technique was also efficient in genotyping Schistosoma mansoni miracidia.[20] Therefore, MDA is a reliable, efficient, and accurate procedure for WGA. Here, based on the MDA method, we successfully acquired a large amount of genomic information about the JNU-1 strain, which provided materials for identifying numerous SNPs. The top five categories with the most SNPs of all GO terms were ATP binding, zinc ion binding, collagen trimers, GPCR signaling, and structural constituents of the cuticle. ATP provides energy and phosphate for the helminth,[21] while the collagen trimer is a protein complex consisting of three collagen chains assembled into a left-handed triple helix. These trimers typically assemble into higher order structures in the helminth.[22] GPCR senses an extracellular signal and transmits the signal across the cell membrane by activating an associated G-protein. It also promotes the exchange of guanosine diphosphate for guanosine triphosphate on the alpha subunit of a heterotrimeric G-protein complex, which is important for the cuticle structure and cellular integrity.[23] Together, these genes are important for the development and biological process of the helminth. Parasite drug resistance has been documented in many studies.[24] Benzimidazole derivatives such as albendazole and mebendazole are the most common drugs used to control hookworm infection. They irreversibly disrupt glucose absorption, leading to kinetic disorder and eventually death.[25] We detected a large number of SNPs in coding regions associated with ATP binding. This indicated that these SNPs influence proteins that bind to ATP, such as ribonucleotide adenosine which carries three phosphate groups esterified to the sugar moiety. Because ATP is the major cellular source of energy and phosphate, we propose that long-term use of benzimidazole derivatives has induced the development of SNPs that improve the ATP binding ability of the hookworm. This may be genetic evidence of drug resistance to benzimidazole derivatives. Other SNPs were associated with zinc ion binding, GPCRs, intracellular signal transduction, and collagen trimers. According to a previous study, more than half (53%) of all current drug targets consist of GPCRs, nuclear receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, kinases, and voltage-gated ion channels.[26] Among them, it is estimated that one-third of currently approved drug targets are GPCRs because these are highly amenable to modulation by pharmaceuticals.[27] Although SNPs are only small variations, they have a large impact on genomes and biological traits, especially SNPs located in coding regions. Although the impact of the SNPs on gene functions was not investigated in this study, it will be interesting to pursue this in future endeavors because splicing SNPs may influence pleiotropic biological processes.[28,29] We are aware that more samples are needed to confirm the relationship between the identified SNPs with pathogenicity or other effects, and additional sample collection has been instigated. We also note that because the published N. americanus genome sequence is of low quality, JNU-1 may differ from the published N. americanus strain. Therefore, the SNPs and other variants may be falsely positive. Additionally, some sequences with potential functions may have been missed. In summary, we uncovered a distinct strain of N. americanus and innovatively explored potential mutations with the help of MDA technology. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of MDA technology for genome resequencing. Additionally, they shed light on possible future investigations of many aspects of small parasites, such as species evolution and epidemiology. This will be beneficial not only to the study of multicellular helminths but also to that of unicellular protozoans. We believe that with the reduction of sequencing costs, this strategy will be widely accepted and applicable to species identification and the sifting of genetic variations.
  29 in total

1.  Optimization and evaluation of single-cell whole-genome multiple displacement amplification.

Authors:  C Spits; C Le Caignec; M De Rycke; L Van Haute; A Van Steirteghem; I Liebaers; K Sermon
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.878

Review 2.  How many drug targets are there?

Authors:  John P Overington; Bissan Al-Lazikani; Andrew L Hopkins
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs.

Authors:  Daniel R Zerbino; Ewan Birney
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Something from (almost) nothing: the impact of multiple displacement amplification on microbial ecology.

Authors:  Erik K Binga; Roger S Lasken; Josh D Neufeld
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Brugia malayi: whole genome amplification for genomic characterization of filarial parasites.

Authors:  Samantha N McNulty; Gary J Weil; Michael Heinz; Seth D Crosby; Peter U Fischer
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 2.011

6.  Taenia crassiceps: energetic and respiratory metabolism from cysticerci exposed to praziquantel and albendazole in vitro.

Authors:  Marina Clare Vinaud; Cirlane Silva Ferreira; Ruy de Souza Lino Junior; José Clecildo Barreto Bezerra
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 2.011

7.  Efficient genotyping of Schistosoma mansoni miracidia following whole genome amplification.

Authors:  Claudia L L Valentim; Philip T LoVerde; Timothy J C Anderson; Charles D Criscione
Journal:  Mol Biochem Parasitol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation.

Authors:  Ken Chen; John W Wallis; Michael D McLellan; David E Larson; Joelle M Kalicki; Craig S Pohl; Sean D McGrath; Michael C Wendl; Qunyuan Zhang; Devin P Locke; Xiaoqi Shi; Robert S Fulton; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Li Ding; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  DAVID-WS: a stateful web service to facilitate gene/protein list analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoli Jiao; Brad T Sherman; Da Wei Huang; Robert Stephens; Michael W Baseler; H Clifford Lane; Richard A Lempicki
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.