Literature DB >> 31330557

Outcomes of surgical resections for benign colon polyps: a systematic review.

Michael P M de Neree Tot Babberich1,2, Maxime E S Bronzwaer1, Jurr O Andriessen1, Barbara A J Bastiaansen1, Nahid Mostafavi3, Willem A Bemelman2, Paul Fockens1, Pieter J Tanis2, Evelien Dekker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Not all benign colonic polyps are suitable for endoscopic resection, although criteria for endoscopic non-resectability vary worldwide. Clinical decision-making largely depends on endoscopic treatment options, as well as postoperative risks after surgical resection. This systematic review aimed to determine postoperative outcomes and the characteristics of surgically resected benign colonic polyps.
METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies investigating the outcomes of surgical resection for benign colonic polyps since 1980. Studies were considered eligible when at least one postoperative outcome (morbidity and/or mortality) was reported. Meta-analyses were conducted for the primary outcome measures (morbidity and mortality) for studies that included patients only after the year 2000.
RESULTS: Of the 4210 studies retrieved, 26 studies describing 139 897 patients were included. The most common indications for surgical resection were polyp location in the right-sided colon, non-pedunculated morphology, and large polyp size. The pooled 1-month complication and mortality rates of studies that included patients after the year 2000 were 24 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 15 % - 36 %) and 0.7 % (95 %CI 0.6 % - 0.8 %), respectively.
CONCLUSION: The postoperative morbidity and mortality after colonic resection for benign polyps are substantial. Referral to an advanced interventional endoscopist should be considered before referral for surgery to evaluate the possibilities for endoscopic treatment of large, non-pedunculated, and/or colonic polyps in difficult locations without suspicion of submucosal malignant invasion. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31330557     DOI: 10.1055/a-0962-9780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  5 in total

1.  Polypectomy and the Efficacy and Safety of Postpolypectomy Clipping.

Authors:  Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2020-09

2.  Correlations of FUT3 gene polymorphisms with colon polyps.

Authors:  Xiaotian Hu; Fang Chen; Wenjuan Ji; Yingying Wang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.534

3.  Adverse events of colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer screening program with fecal immunochemical testing: a population-based observational study.

Authors:  Bernard Denis; Isabelle Gendre; Sarah Weber; Philippe Perrin
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-02-03

Review 4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: outcomes and predictors of recurrence.

Authors:  Roberta Maselli; Marco Spadaccini; Paul J Belletrutti; Piera Alessia Galtieri; Simona Attardo; Silvia Carrara; Andrea Anderloni; Alessandro Fugazza; Elisa Chiara Ferrara; Gaia Pellegatta; Andrea Iannone; Cesare Hassan; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-01-14

5.  Ileocecal Valve Sparing Resection for the Treatment of Benign Cecal Polyps Unsuitable for Polypectomy.

Authors:  Souhaylah Abdalla; Hélène Meillat; Claire Fillol; Kevin Zuber; Gilles Manceau; Vincent Dubray; Laura Beyer-Berjot; Jérémie H Lefevre; Marie Selvy; Stéphane Benoist; Renato Micelli Lupinacci
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.