Katherine McLean1, Philip R Kavanaugh2. 1. Administration of Justice, Penn State Greater Allegheny, 4000 University Drive, McKeesport, PA, 15131, United States. Electronic address: kjm47@psu.edu. 2. School of Public Affairs, Penn State Harrisburg, 777 W. Harrisburg Pike, Middletown, PA, 17057, United States. Electronic address: prk114@psu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine maintenance therapy (BMT) has been widely recognized as one of the most effective treatments for opioid use disorders (OUD). In the midst of the U.S. opioid overdose crisis, local, state, and federal authorities have attempted to increase the availability of BMT, yet few individuals meeting the criteria for OUD utilize BMT. Moreover, recent research suggests that a significant proportion of individuals who use opioids seek out buprenorphine on the illicit market to self-govern and manage withdrawal sickness. METHODS: This paper presents data from a geographic sub-sample within a multi-site study of buprenorphine diversion in Pennsylvania. We endeavor to bolster a slim qualitative literature on the use of non-prescribed buprenorphine through in-depth interviews with 20 individuals who reported buying or receiving buprenorphine outside of medically-sanctioned contexts. Interviews characterized participants' reasons for both using non-prescribed buprenorphine and eschewing formal treatment, in a state (Pennsylvania) afflicted with high rates of heroin use and overdose deaths. Transcripts were initially coded for broad interview topics, while latent themes relating to buprenorphine diversion and extra-medical use also emerged. RESULTS: Analyses revealed complex motivations underlying participants' extra-medical use of buprenorphine. Where some expressed a desire for treatment autonomy and treatment medications that could not be achieved or obtained within BMT, individuals also indicated a persistent lack of treatment availability and access due to diverse barriers. CONCLUSION: This study shows how issues related to availability, accessibility, and acceptability many explain low rates of BMT utilization, even within a place and time defined by medication-assisted treatment expansion. Beyond offering broad rhetorical and financial support for MAT, our findings suggest that governmental actors should continue to pursue policies that expand the spatial distribution of BMT. It also underscores the need to look beyond current models of buprenorphine maintenance and to consider modes of buprenorphine delivery beyond long-term maintenance.
BACKGROUND:Buprenorphine maintenance therapy (BMT) has been widely recognized as one of the most effective treatments for opioid use disorders (OUD). In the midst of the U.S. opioid overdose crisis, local, state, and federal authorities have attempted to increase the availability of BMT, yet few individuals meeting the criteria for OUD utilize BMT. Moreover, recent research suggests that a significant proportion of individuals who use opioids seek out buprenorphine on the illicit market to self-govern and manage withdrawal sickness. METHODS: This paper presents data from a geographic sub-sample within a multi-site study of buprenorphine diversion in Pennsylvania. We endeavor to bolster a slim qualitative literature on the use of non-prescribed buprenorphine through in-depth interviews with 20 individuals who reported buying or receiving buprenorphine outside of medically-sanctioned contexts. Interviews characterized participants' reasons for both using non-prescribed buprenorphine and eschewing formal treatment, in a state (Pennsylvania) afflicted with high rates of heroin use and overdose deaths. Transcripts were initially coded for broad interview topics, while latent themes relating to buprenorphine diversion and extra-medical use also emerged. RESULTS: Analyses revealed complex motivations underlying participants' extra-medical use of buprenorphine. Where some expressed a desire for treatment autonomy and treatment medications that could not be achieved or obtained within BMT, individuals also indicated a persistent lack of treatment availability and access due to diverse barriers. CONCLUSION: This study shows how issues related to availability, accessibility, and acceptability many explain low rates of BMT utilization, even within a place and time defined by medication-assisted treatment expansion. Beyond offering broad rhetorical and financial support for MAT, our findings suggest that governmental actors should continue to pursue policies that expand the spatial distribution of BMT. It also underscores the need to look beyond current models of buprenorphine maintenance and to consider modes of buprenorphine delivery beyond long-term maintenance.
Authors: Andrea Jakubowski; Brianna L Norton; Benjamin T Hayes; Brent E Gibson; Christine Fitzsimmons; L Synn Stern; Franklin Ramirez; Mercedes Guzman; Susan Spratt; Pia Marcus; Aaron D Fox Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2021-11-12 Impact factor: 4.647
Authors: Pablo K Valente; Angela R Bazzi; Ellen Childs; Peter Salhaney; Joel Earlywine; Jennifer Olson; Dea L Biancarelli; Brandon D L Marshall; Katie B Biello Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2020-09-07
Authors: Sydney M Silverstein; Raminta Daniulaityte; Shannon C Miller; Silvia S Martins; Robert G Carlson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-03-16 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Benjamin T Hayes; Andrea Jakubowski; Christine Fitzsimmons; Billy Garcia; Franklin Ramirez; Aaron D Fox Journal: Subst Use Misuse Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 2.164
Authors: Apostolos A Alexandridis; Nabarun Dasgupta; Christopher L Ringwalt; Wayne D Rosamond; Paul R Chelminski; Stephen W Marshall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andrew A Herring; Aidan A Vosooghi; Joshua Luftig; Erik S Anderson; Xiwen Zhao; James Dziura; Kathryn F Hawk; Ryan P McCormack; Andrew Saxon; Gail D'Onofrio Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-07-01
Authors: Alireza Boloori; Bengt B Arnetz; Frederi Viens; Taps Maiti; Judith E Arnetz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 3.390