| Literature DB >> 31330100 |
Yunbin Hu1,2, Giuseppe M Paternò3, Xiao-Ye Wang1, Xin-Chang Wang4, Michele Guizzardi5, Qiang Chen1, Dieter Schollmeyer6, Xiao-Yu Cao4, Giulio Cerullo5, Francesco Scotognella3,5, Klaus Müllen1,7, Akimitsu Narita1,8.
Abstract
A π-extended double [7]carbohelicene 2 with fused pyrene units was synthesized, revealing considerable intra- and intermolecular π-π interactions as confirmed with X-ray crystallography. As compared to the previous double [7]carbohelicene 1, the π-extended homologue 2 demonstrated considerably red-shifted absorption with an onset at 645 nm (1: 550 nm) corresponding to a smaller optical gap of 1.90 eV (1: 2.25 eV). A broad near-infrared emission from 600 to 900 nm with a large Stokes shift of ∼100 nm (2.3 × 103 cm-1) was recorded for 2, implying formation of an intramolecular excimer upon excitation, which was corroborated with femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Moreover, 2 revealed remarkable chiral stability with a fairly high isomerization barrier of 46 kcal mol-1, according to density functional theory calculations, which allowed optical resolution by chiral HPLC and suggests potential applications in chiroptical devices.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31330100 PMCID: PMC6696512 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b05610
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Chem Soc ISSN: 0002-7863 Impact factor: 15.419
Figure 1(a) Representative examples of π-extended helicenes and multihelicenes. (b) Extension of dibenzo-fused double [7]carbohelicene 1 to double [7]carbohelicene 2 with fused pyrene units.
Scheme 1Synthesis of Pyrene-Fused Double [7]Carbohelicene 2
Figure 2Crystal structure of pyrene-fused double [7]carbohelicene 2. tert-Butyl groups and hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. (a) Top and side views of the ORTEP drawing of 2, providing 50% probability thermal ellipsoids. (b) Comparison between crystal structures of 2 (left) and 1 (right), showing vertical distances between terminal benzene rings. (c) Crystal packing of 2, showing homochiral stacking (π–π stacking between molecules with the same handedness) along the a-axis and heterochiral stacking (π–π stacking between molecules with different handedness) along the b-axis.
Figure 3(a) Absorption (solid lines) and emission (dashed lines) spectra of 1 (7.48 × 10–6 mol L–1, excitation wavelength: 376 nm) and 2 (6.43 × 10–6 mol L–1, excitation wavelength: 450 nm) in dichloromethane. (b) Energy diagrams and major transitions between frontier orbitals of 2 calculated by TD-DFT at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level of theory. Values in parentheses represent the oscillator strengths (f).
Figure 4(a) Differential transmission (ΔT/T) spectra of 2 at a pump–probe delay of 1 ps and (b) normalized ΔT/T dynamics (expressed in absolute value) of 2 in THF solution with the concentration of 0.1 mg/mL. The inset shows the first 10 ps of the dynamics, highlighting the ultrafast decay of the PB signal and the concomitant rise of the ESA (600–750 nm) trace. (c) Simplified scheme (not in absolute energy scale) showing the possible excited-state photophysics of 2 upon excitation with a pump pulse (530 nm). (d) Normalized ΔT/T dynamics (expressed in absolute value) of 2 in THF solution with the concentration of 0.1 mg/mL, and in 40 mg/mL polystyrene (PS) solution in THF with the concentration of 0.05 mg/mL.
Figure 5(a) Isomerization process between (P,P)-2 and (P,M)-2. The relative Gibbs free energy was calculated at the B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) level. (b) Experimental and simulated circular dichroism spectra of (P,P)-2 and (M,M)-2.