Literature DB >> 31329827

Left ventricular remodelling and change in left ventricular global longitudinal strain after cardiac resynchronization therapy: prognostic implications.

Pieter van der Bijl1, Marina V Kostyukevich1, Mand Khidir1, Nina Ajmone Marsan1, Victoria Delgado1, Jeroen J Bax1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can reduce left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and a decrease of ≥15% is defined as a response. CRT can also improve LV global longitudinal strain (GLS). Changes in LVESV and LV GLS are individually associated with outcome post-CRT. We investigated LVESV and LV GLS changes and prognostic implications of improvement in LVESV and/or LV GLS, compared with no improvement in either parameter. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Baseline and 6-month echocardiograms were analysed from CRT recipients with heart failure. LV reverse remodelling was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LVESV at 6 months post-CRT. A ≥5% absolute improvement in LV GLS was defined as a change in LV GLS. A total of 1185 patients were included (mean age 65 ± 10 years, 73% male), and those with an improvement in LVESV and LV GLS (n = 131, 11.1%) had significantly lower mortality compared with other groups. On multivariable analysis, an improvement in both LVESV and LV GLS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31-0.71; P < 0.001] or an improvement in either LVESV or LV GLS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.71; P < 0.001) were independently associated with better prognosis, compared with no improvement in either parameter.
CONCLUSION: Either a reduction in LVESV and/or an improvement in LV GLS at 6 months post-CRT are independently associated with improved long-term prognosis, compared with no change in both LVESV and LV GLS. This supports the use of LV GLS as a meaningful parameter in defining CRT response. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; global longitudinal strain; left ventricular remodelling; survival

Year:  2019        PMID: 31329827     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  5 in total

Review 1.  Global longitudinal strain predicts responders after cardiac resynchronization therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Costas Thomopoulos; Gary Tse; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Clinical implications of left atrial reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Jan Stassen; Xavier Galloo; Surenjav Chimed; Kensuke Hirasawa; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Victoria Delgado; Pieter van der Bijl; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.130

Review 3.  The prognostic role of speckle tracking echocardiography in clinical practice: evidence and reference values from the literature.

Authors:  Maria Concetta Pastore; Giuseppe De Carli; Giulia Elena Mandoli; Flavio D'Ascenzi; Marta Focardi; Francesco Contorni; Sergio Mondillo; Matteo Cameli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Sacubitril/Valsartan Induces Global Cardiac Reverse Remodeling in Long-Lasting Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Standard and Advanced Echocardiographic Evidences.

Authors:  Matteo Castrichini; Paolo Manca; Vincenzo Nuzzi; Giulia Barbati; Antonio De Luca; Renata Korcova; Davide Stolfo; Andrea Di Lenarda; Marco Merlo; Gianfranco Sinagra
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Acute correction of electromechanical dyssynchrony and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Guillaume Viart; Frédéric Anselme
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-03-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.