Jin Pyeong Kim1,2, Dong Kun Lee3, Jeong Hwan Moon4, Jun Sun Ryu5, Seung Hoon Woo6. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea. 2. Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National Cancer Center, Ilsan, Republic of Korea. 5. Head and Neck Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Center, Ilsan. 6. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Transoral surgery is gaining favor because it has the advantage of leaving no scar after surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, observational study. METHODS: This study was designed as a 7-year, prospective, multicenter evaluation of endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision. Clinical outcomes and complications related to the procedures were evaluated in patients. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excisions, and 22 patients underwent conventional parotidectomy approach excisions. There was no significant difference with respect to overall demographic characteristics between the groups. However, the operation times were shorter in the transoral approach group (P = 0.001), and cosmetic satisfaction was much better in the transoral group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision is a potentially safe and effective procedure with excellent outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 130:1218-1226, 2020.
OBJECTIVE: Transoral surgery is gaining favor because it has the advantage of leaving no scar after surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and safety of endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, observational study. METHODS: This study was designed as a 7-year, prospective, multicenter evaluation of endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision. Clinical outcomes and complications related to the procedures were evaluated in patients. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excisions, and 22 patients underwent conventional parotidectomy approach excisions. There was no significant difference with respect to overall demographic characteristics between the groups. However, the operation times were shorter in the transoral approach group (P = 0.001), and cosmetic satisfaction was much better in the transoral group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Endoscope-assisted transoral accessory parotid mass excision is a potentially safe and effective procedure with excellent outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 130:1218-1226, 2020.