Ying Xian1,2, Haolin Xu1, Emily C O'Brien1, Shreyansh Shah2, Laine Thomas1, Michael J Pencina1, Gregg C Fonarow3, DaiWai M Olson4, Lee H Schwamm5, Deepak L Bhatt6, Eric E Smith7, Deidre Hannah8, Lesley Maisch8, Barbara L Lytle1, Eric D Peterson1, Adrian F Hernandez1. 1. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles. 4. University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas. 5. Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. 6. Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 8. Patient-Centered Research Into Outcomes Stroke Patients Prefer and Effectiveness Research Study, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are at high risk. Despite demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, real-world data of DOACs vs warfarin for secondary prevention in patients with ischemic stroke are largely based on administrative claims or have not focused on patient-centered outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical effectiveness of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) vs warfarin after ischemic stroke in patients with AF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included patients who were 65 years or older, had AF, were anticoagulation naive, and were discharged from 1041 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke-associated hospitals for acute ischemic stroke between October 2011 and December 2014. Data were linked to Medicare claims for long-term outcomes (up to December 2015). Analyses were completed in July 2018. EXPOSURES: DOACs vs warfarin prescription at discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were home time, a patient-centered measure defined as the total number of days free from death and institutional care after discharge, and major adverse cardiovascular events. A propensity score-overlap weighting method was used to account for differences in observed characteristics between groups. RESULTS: Of 11 662 survivors of acute ischemic stroke (median [interquartile range] age, 80 [74-86] years), 4041 (34.7%) were discharged with DOACs and 7621 with warfarin. Except for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (median [interquartile range], 4 [1-9] vs 5 [2-11]), baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients discharged with DOACs (vs warfarin) had more days at home (mean [SD], 287.2 [114.7] vs 263.0 [127.3] days; adjusted difference, 15.6 [99% CI, 9.0-22.1] days) during the first year postdischarge and were less likely to experience major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.89 [99% CI, 0.83-0.96]). Also, in patients receiving DOACs, there were fewer deaths (aHR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82-0.95]; P < .001), all-cause readmissions (aHR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]; P = .003), cardiovascular readmissions (aHR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.99]; P = .02), hemorrhagic strokes (aHR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50-0.95]; P = .02), and hospitalizations with bleeding (aHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.97]; P = .009) but a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (aHR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.30]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF, DOAC use at discharge was associated with better long-term outcomes relative to warfarin.
IMPORTANCE: Current guidelines recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are at high risk. Despite demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials, real-world data of DOACs vs warfarin for secondary prevention in patients with ischemic stroke are largely based on administrative claims or have not focused on patient-centered outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical effectiveness of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban) vs warfarin after ischemic stroke in patients with AF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study included patients who were 65 years or older, had AF, were anticoagulation naive, and were discharged from 1041 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke-associated hospitals for acute ischemic stroke between October 2011 and December 2014. Data were linked to Medicare claims for long-term outcomes (up to December 2015). Analyses were completed in July 2018. EXPOSURES: DOACs vs warfarin prescription at discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were home time, a patient-centered measure defined as the total number of days free from death and institutional care after discharge, and major adverse cardiovascular events. A propensity score-overlap weighting method was used to account for differences in observed characteristics between groups. RESULTS: Of 11 662 survivors of acute ischemic stroke (median [interquartile range] age, 80 [74-86] years), 4041 (34.7%) were discharged with DOACs and 7621 with warfarin. Except for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (median [interquartile range], 4 [1-9] vs 5 [2-11]), baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients discharged with DOACs (vs warfarin) had more days at home (mean [SD], 287.2 [114.7] vs 263.0 [127.3] days; adjusted difference, 15.6 [99% CI, 9.0-22.1] days) during the first year postdischarge and were less likely to experience major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.89 [99% CI, 0.83-0.96]). Also, in patients receiving DOACs, there were fewer deaths (aHR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.82-0.95]; P < .001), all-cause readmissions (aHR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]; P = .003), cardiovascular readmissions (aHR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.99]; P = .02), hemorrhagic strokes (aHR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.50-0.95]; P = .02), and hospitalizations with bleeding (aHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.97]; P = .009) but a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (aHR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.30]; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF, DOAC use at discharge was associated with better long-term outcomes relative to warfarin.
Authors: Andrew D Wilcock; Kori S Zachrison; Lee H Schwamm; Lori Uscher-Pines; Jose R Zubizarreta; Ateev Mehrotra Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Utibe R Essien; Jared W Magnani; Nemin Chen; Walid F Gellad; Michael J Fine; Inmaculada Hernandez Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Shadi Yaghi; Eva Mistry; Ava L Liberman; James Giles; Syed Daniyal Asad; Angela Liu; Muhammad Nagy; Ashutosh Kaushal; Idrees Azher; Brian Mac Grory; Hiba Fakhri; Kiersten Brown Espaillat; Hemanth Pasupuleti; Heather Martin; Jose Tan; Manivannan Veerasamy; Charles Esenwa; Natalie Cheng; Khadean Moncrieffe; Iman Moeini-Naghani; Mithilesh Siddu; Erica Scher; Tushar Trivedi; Aaron Lord; Karen Furie; Salah Keyrouz; Amre Nouh; Christopher R Leon Guerrero; Adam de Havenon; Muhib Khan; Nils Henninger Journal: Stroke Date: 2020-08-06 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Stine Munk Hald; Sören Möller; Luis Alberto García Rodríguez; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Mike Sharma; Hanne Christensen; Maja Hellfritzsch; Anton Pottegård; Jesper Hallas; David Gaist Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-05-03
Authors: Bory Kea; Bethany T Waites; Amber Lin; Merritt Raitt; David R Vinson; Niroj Ari; Luke Welle; Andrew Sill; Dana Button; Benjamin C Sun Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2020-06-29