Literature DB >> 31329001

Capturing interprofessional collaboration between physicians and nurses in an acute care setting. A validation study of the revised German version of the Collaborative Practice Scales.

Horst Rettke1, Anja I Lehmann2, Rebecca Brauchli2, Georg F Bauer2, Heidi Petry3, Rebecca Spirig4,5.   

Abstract

The relevance of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is widely acknowledged. Given the lack of a fully validated instrument in the German language for measuring the level of IPC, we built upon the current, albeit psychometrically weak, German-language version of the instrument to devise a new version with improved wording and for subsequent psychometric testing. In a tertiary hospital in German-speaking Switzerland, 160 physicians and 374 nurses completed the revised Collaborative Practice Scales in German (CPS-G) and additional scales regarding positive and negative activation at work and regarding job demands and job resources. A confirmatory factor analysis of the CPS-G was performed, and internal consistency estimates were computed. Partial correlations between the CPS-G and the additional scales were examined for criterion validity. The model fit of the CPS-G was good for physicians (χ2/df = 2.38, p < .001; CFI = .923; RMSEA = .051, 90%-CI (0.037-0.065)) and moderate for nurses (χ2/df = 5, p < .001; CFI = .919; RMSEA = .087, 90%-CI (0.072-0.102)) supporting the two-factor structure of the original English version. Reliability was acceptable in all sub-scales for physicians (inclusion, α = 0.79; consensus, α = 0.80) and nurses (assertiveness, α = 0.77; understanding α = 0.82). As expected, the CPS-G physicians' subscales correlated positively with positive activation and job resources and negatively with negative activation and job demands, albeit not always statistically significantly. Similar correlations were found with the CPS-G nurses' subscales other than in one instance. The CPS-G showed good construct and criterion validity and acceptable internal consistency. It consequently represents a valid instrument ready for application to measure the level of interprofessional collaboration between nurses and physicians in acute care settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collaborative competence; Interprofessional collaboration; Quantitave method; professional relations; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31329001     DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1629399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interprof Care        ISSN: 1356-1820            Impact factor:   2.338


  3 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the interprofessional collaboration scale validation between nurses towards other health care professionals occupied in Italian emergency medical services.

Authors:  Marco Carradore; Massimo Guasconi; Gian Domenico Giusti; Giovanna Artioli; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-08-31

2.  Using simulation to help healthcare professionals relaying patient information during telephone conversations.

Authors:  Lene F Petersen; Marlene D Madsen; Doris Østergaard; Peter Dieckmann
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-08-12

3.  The Need for and Perceptions of Interprofessional Education and Collaboration Among Undergraduate Students in Nursing and Medicine in South Korea.

Authors:  Hee-Young Song; Kyoung A Nam
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2022-04-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.