Literature DB >> 31328935

Remembering a nation's past to imagine its future: The role of event specificity, phenomenology, valence, and perceived agency.

Meymune N Topcu1, William Hirst1.   

Abstract

People are routinely involved in remembering the national past and imagining the national future, especially when making political decisions. These processes, however, have not been explored extensively. The present research aims to address this lacuna. In 2 experiments (N = 203), participants were asked to remember and imagine events that involve the United States. Later, they rated these events in terms of phenomenal characteristics, valence, and perceived agency (circumstance, self, other-people, nation). Their responses were also coded for specificity and content. Past and future responses correlated for specificity, phenomenology, valence, and the four domains of perceived agency. Despite this strong correspondence between past and future thinking, there were also differences. Future responses were less specific and more positive than past responses. Moreover, people thought that they themselves and their nation will have more control over their nation's future compared with the control they attributed to themselves and their nation over its past. The bias to be more optimistic about the nation's future was partly explained by this tendency to see the nation as more agentic in the future. Taken together, these results reveal striking similarities and divergences between autobiographical and collective mental time travel. The present research provides an exploration for the newly emerging field of collective mental time travel. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31328935     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  5 in total

1.  Collective remembering and future forecasting during the COVID-19 pandemic: How the impact of COVID-19 affected the themes and phenomenology of global and national memories across 15 countries.

Authors:  Sezin Öner; Lynn Ann Watson; Zeynep Adıgüzel; İrem Ergen; Ezgi Bilgin; Antonietta Curci; Scott Cole; Manuel L de la Mata; Steve M J Janssen; Tiziana Lanciano; Ioanna Markostamou; Veronika Nourkova; Andrés Santamaría; Andrea Taylor; Krystian Barzykowski; Miguel Bascón; Christina Bermeitinger; Rosario Cubero-Pérez; Steven Dessenberger; Maryanne Garry; Sami Gülgöz; Ryan Hackländer; Lucrèce Heux; Zheng Jin; María Lojo; José Antonio Matías-García; Henry L Roediger; Karl Szpunar; Eylul Tekin; Oyku Uner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-07-12

2.  People from the U.S. and China think about their personal and collective future differently.

Authors:  Will Deng; Alexa K Rosenblatt; Thomas Talhelm; Adam L Putnam
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-07-20

3.  Implicit intertemporal trajectories in cognitive representations of the self and nation.

Authors:  Jeremy K Yamashiro; James H Liu; Robert Jiqi Zhang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-10-19

4.  The impact of group identity on the interaction between collective memory and collective future thinking negativity: Evidence from a Turkish sample.

Authors:  Deniz Hacıbektaşoğlu; Ali I Tekcan; Reyyan Bilge; Aysecan Boduroglu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  What lies ahead of us? Collective future thinking in Turkish, Chinese, and American adults.

Authors:  Nazike Mert; Yubo Hou; Qi Wang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-05-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.